Hi Ray,
Once again this diminished scientist cannot cope with the full complexity
of your latest post while having his first pot of tea of the day. So I'll
reply to just one point for now, and try and puzzle out the rest later.
When I wrote (17 Dec):
Taking the longer view, the ordinary person
Keith,
- Original Message -
From: Keith Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ray Evans Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:59 AM
Subject: Height and weight (was Re: Diminution and Expansion)
(snip)
Good gracious! You don't have to be much
Hi Ray,
I've been trying to think how to answer your latest in a simple way. And
writing that, I suppose, explains the difference in our approach -- whereas
you enlarge, I'm always looking for what may be the crux of any problem.
One sentence you wrote probably summarises the difference best.
ds,
REH
- Original Message -
From: Keith Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ray Evans Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:28
PM
Subject: Diminution and
Expansion
Hi Ray, I've been
trying to think how to answer your latest in a
