Hi,
Is it true that fvwm has no maintainer now? if so, is fvwm still being
developed anymore? are there any features planned or is it a dying project?
TIA!
Jason
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 02:28:16 -0800 (PST), Jason wrote:
is fvwm still being developed anymore?
Check the source code repository¹? :-)
are there any features planned or is it a dying project?
FVWM works great for me, so - to me - that means it is a very successful
project.
I don't miss any
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 02:28:16AM -0800, Jason Timrod wrote:
Hi,
Is it true that fvwm has no maintainer now? if so, is fvwm still being
No. For years, FVWN has had no *one* maintainer *by design*. Any one with
a commit bit is effectively able to commit back.
-- Thomas Adam
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:06:36 +0100
Adam Sjøgren wrote:
I think it would be much more accurate to call FVWM mature.
An even better word is useful (unlike many linux products under
frenetic active development by folks who believe change is always
good no matter how stupid it is :-).
