On 3/2/24 01:55, Paul Fox wrote:
I realize this discussion is drifting away from fvwm, but...
...a major part of my daily activity has always depended on X11's
ability to function on remote displays. Does that functionality
(i.e. "DISPLAY=remotehost:0" vs. "DISPLAY=:0") exist if either or
both
> John McCue writes:
> I heard of waypipe, but from what I understand is for it to work, the
> remote system needs to have wayland too.
Well, it's for running a wayland application on a remote machine
displaying on your local wayland-running machine. If you want to run an
X11 application
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 06:11:01PM -0600, Jason Tibbitts wrote:
Robert Heller writes:
I believe Wayland does not support that sort of thing.
It does, actually, but not exactly the same way. Look up "waypipe".
One does get the impression that it's all an afterthought, though.
I heard of
robert wrote:
>
> At Fri, 02 Feb 2024 18:11:01 -0600 Jason Tibbitts wrote:
>
> >
> > > Robert Heller writes:
> >
> > > I believe Wayland does not support that sort of thing.
> >
> > It does, actually, but not exactly the same way. Look up "waypipe".
> > One does get the
At Fri, 02 Feb 2024 18:11:01 -0600 Jason Tibbitts wrote:
>
> > Robert Heller writes:
>
> > I believe Wayland does not support that sort of thing.
>
> It does, actually, but not exactly the same way. Look up "waypipe".
> One does get the impression that it's all an afterthought,
> Robert Heller writes:
> I believe Wayland does not support that sort of thing.
It does, actually, but not exactly the same way. Look up "waypipe".
One does get the impression that it's all an afterthought, though.
- J<
At Fri, 02 Feb 2024 10:55:46 -0500 Paul Fox wrote:
>
> I realize this discussion is drifting away from fvwm, but...
>
> ...a major part of my daily activity has always depended on X11's
> ability to function on remote displays. Does that functionality
> (i.e. "DISPLAY=remotehost:0" vs.
> Does wayland have an X11 compatibility feature?
Wayland has an 'XWayland' layer that allows regular X clients to talk to
a Wayland server. However, this does not support special X clients like
window managers or (as I understand it) automation tools like 'xdotool'.
So you can run an X-based
I realize this discussion is drifting away from fvwm, but...
...a major part of my daily activity has always depended on X11's
ability to function on remote displays. Does that functionality
(i.e. "DISPLAY=remotehost:0" vs. "DISPLAY=:0") exist if either or
both of the hosts is based on Wayland?
Also a bunch of new DE/WM and soon XFCE. There will still be diversity,
but a new one.
However I'm not sure Xorg will be out soon there are still missing
features on Wayland, like screen recording (available only on Gnome),
which means that softwares like OBS don't work on it.
Le 02/02/2024 à
At Fri, 02 Feb 2024 04:28:44 +0100 hw wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2024-01-30 at 14:02 -0700, Jaimos Skriletz wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:25â¯PM hw wrote:
> > >
> > > so is there finally a version that works for wayland?
> > >
> > No, fvwm only works with xorg and most likely won't be
11 matches
Mail list logo
