On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 05:23:09PM -0500, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> > During immediate function execution fvwm tries to get exclusive
> > control of the pointer (a "grab"). This failed in the given case
> > because some other program held the grab. Fvwm retries grabbing
> > for a second before
> During immediate function execution fvwm tries to get exclusive
> control of the pointer (a "grab"). This failed in the given case
> because some other program held the grab. Fvwm retries grabbing
> for a second before giving up (the function is aborted). It seems
> that for whatever reason
Branch: refs/heads/dv/new-parser-2
Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm
Commit: b26886b96ce400d9258fa586011cf7b97e795c7b
https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/b26886b96ce400d9258fa586011cf7b97e795c7b
Author: Dominik Vogt
Date: 2016-11-15 (Tue, 15 Nov
Branch: refs/heads/dv/new-parser-2
Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm
Commit: 3443ade4c10cef5e0d2b6f3a30b30b6731a9ec60
https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/3443ade4c10cef5e0d2b6f3a30b30b6731a9ec60
Author: Dominik Vogt
Date: 2016-11-15 (Tue, 15 Nov
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 04:39:53PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> I'm still struggling with reproducing a creash in the a crash in
> the branch dv/new-parser-2. It has something to do with passing
> around arguments from one complex function to another (possibly
> nested deeper). In some
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:08:08PM +, Jürgen Hartmann wrote:
> On my Linux host system (Xorg 7.6 / Kernel 3.11.6) I use Fvwm 2.6.7 as window
> manager (congratulation to the new default configuration which I like very
> much) and Vmware Workstation 9.0.4 to run virtual machines that use
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:30:10AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 11/12/2016 07:59 AM, Marco Maggi wrote:
> >
> > I do not follow the devel mailing list. There is a single very
> > selfish request I have: continue to allow fvwm to fully configure the
> > use of the keyboard (I
On 11/12/2016 07:59 AM, Marco Maggi wrote:
>
> I do not follow the devel mailing list. There is a single very
> selfish request I have: continue to allow fvwm to fully configure the
> use of the keyboard (I have fvwm intercept the function keys (F1, ...)
> to do stuff for me, and