On 18 August 2014 15:39, Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de wrote:
The TODO is just the foundation of the new project. It lists a
lot of very important infrastructure changes that are actually
very un-sexy for users.
Yes, they do look boring, i am sorry to say this but it is what i think.
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. August 2014 um 12:53 Uhr
Von: Martin Cermak marti...@gmail.com
An: Michael Treibton mtreib...@googlemail.com
Cc: fvwm fvwm@fvwm.org
Betreff: Re: FVWM: fvwm - porting patches from mvwm
On Tue 2014-08-19 10:09 , Michael Treibton wrote:
But then why can't
On 18 August 2014 05:50, Dan Espen des...@verizon.net wrote:
Brian bvamund...@yahoo.com writes:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:25:43 +0100
Michael Treibton mtreib...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 15 August 2014 21:05, Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de wrote:
I'll start a new mail thread about parsing
Thomas Adam tho...@fvwm.org writes:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:37:37PM +0100, Michael Treibton wrote:
On 18 August 2014 05:50, Dan Espen des...@verizon.net wrote:
Brian bvamund...@yahoo.com writes:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:25:43 +0100
Michael Treibton mtreib...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 09:32:11AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
I haven't examined mvwm all that closely.
At the moment, mvwm is mostly fvwm with a lot of old and obscure
features removed and some changes of repository layout.
I had assumed that the mvwm work would eventually fold back into Fvwm.
Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de writes:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 09:32:11AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
I haven't examined mvwm all that closely.
At the moment, mvwm is mostly fvwm with a lot of old and obscure
features removed and some changes of repository layout.
I had assumed that the mvwm
Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de writes:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:25:51AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de writes:
I just did something similar for a work project.
But I didn't have a lifetime, so I just implemented the table
driven parser for the commands I was
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:40:33PM +0100, Michael Treibton wrote:
On 18 August 2014 12:44, Thomas Adam tho...@fvwm.org wrote:
Is this perhaps not clear enough? I appreciate the enthusiasm, but this
groundwork is really important before we can move forward. Unless there's
anyone else who
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:39:51PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de writes:
It works perfectly for me too. But I wish it was easier to
introduce new features, and I'm still dreaming about some kind of
database approach to window configuration where you can just
On 15 August 2014 21:05, Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de wrote:
I'll start a new mail thread about parsing with the prefix
REWRITE: in a minute.
In the mean time I've created a github user id 'domivogt' and
cloned the mvwm repository and would be happy if you gave me push
access so that I
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:25:43 +0100
Michael Treibton mtreib...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 15 August 2014 21:05, Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de wrote:
I'll start a new mail thread about parsing with the prefix
REWRITE: in a minute.
In the mean time I've created a github user id 'domivogt'
Brian bvamund...@yahoo.com writes:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:25:43 +0100
Michael Treibton mtreib...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 15 August 2014 21:05, Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de wrote:
I'll start a new mail thread about parsing with the prefix
REWRITE: in a minute.
In the mean time
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:24:03AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
* The mvwm name is not set in stone, it was just a crappy name from me
differentiate it; so I'm not that hung-up on it. If it sticks, that's
fine, if not, fvwm3, or something else suits me.
Or even twm Thomas's Window manager
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 08:03:23AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
I think I've noted this above, but to be clear, the relationship is that
fvwm continues as it is at the moment, and people are free to work on
it, commit to it, fix bugs, etc. With mvwm, it's a way for us to try
out completely
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 02:37:10PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
P.S.: And I do want a window manager with a reference to cats in its
name. ;-)
Maybe the 'm' in mvwm could stand for moggy or something then? Maybe as
time progresses we'll think of something different.
Felinevwm (short:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 09:05:52PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
In the mean time I've created a github user id 'domivogt' and
cloned the mvwm repository and would be happy if you gave me push
access so that I can start to work in topic branches there.
OK. AFAICT, I've given you permission to
On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 10:52 -0400, Bob Woodside wrote:
On 8/14/2014 4:19 AM, Michael Großer wrote:
Thomas Adam wrote:
Quote:
- Does having pages *and* desks make sense anymore?
- Just go with pages, which can be named.
Please keep in mind that the ability to allow pages *and* desks
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 04:49:57PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
On 14 August 2014 15:52, Bob Woodside fvwm...@woodsway.com wrote:
I should be very upset to see this unique feature dropped.
Sure; it was more a consideration of fitting EWMH into this, where
that concept of page/desk definitions
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:15:54PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:51:33AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
this guy asked about porting mvwm patches to fvwm, and I don't
know what to answer. As you know, I've been inactive in fvwm for
years, and I even missed your fork.
Hi Thomas,
this guy asked about porting mvwm patches to fvwm, and I don't
know what to answer. As you know, I've been inactive in fvwm for
years, and I even missed your fork. Can you tell me a bit about
your project, its goals and what your plans are for the future
relation of fvwm and mvwm?
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:02:00PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Hi Dominik,
this guy asked about porting mvwm patches to fvwm, and I don't
know what to answer. As you know, I've been inactive in fvwm for
years, and I even missed your fork. Can you tell me a bit about
your
Hi,
I've been trying to port some patches from mvwm, which is the clean-up
effort of another person who uses fvwm.
The one I'm interested in is a change to libs/FScreen.h to introduce
separate monitor support, which as I can understand it, makes each
screen separate with its own set of desks and
22 matches
Mail list logo
