CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: domivogt07/08/19 06:15:31
Modified files:
doc/fvwm : options.xml
Log message:
* Corrected a typo and tried to remove color limit table with a list (but
failed).
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: griph 07/08/19 12:01:21
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog configure.ac
doc: ChangeLog
doc/fvwm : Makefile.am options.xml
Log message:
* replaced color limit table with
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:42:15AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:09:46PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
On 8/18/07, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you eliminate the use of tables then? I think we just have a
couple of them.
Allright, with your latest
On 8/18/07, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 09:22:44PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
I don't like ListenOnly modules because it's dependent on how modules
talk with fvwm at present. I'd really prefer a mechanism that can't
cripple us in the future. And IMHO
On 8/19/07, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:42:15AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:09:46PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
On 8/18/07, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you eliminate the use of tables then? I think we just have
On 8/18/07, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 09:22:44PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
I don't like ListenOnly modules because it's dependent on how modules
talk with fvwm at present. I'd really prefer a mechanism that can't
cripple us in the future. And IMHO