CVS domivogt: * Corrected a typo and tried to remove color limit table with a list (but

2007-08-19 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: domivogt07/08/19 06:15:31 Modified files: doc/fvwm : options.xml Log message: * Corrected a typo and tried to remove color limit table with a list (but failed).

CVS griph: * replaced color limit table with lists

2007-08-19 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: griph 07/08/19 12:01:21 Modified files: . : ChangeLog configure.ac doc: ChangeLog doc/fvwm : Makefile.am options.xml Log message: * replaced color limit table with

Re: New 2.5.22 release?

2007-08-19 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:42:15AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:09:46PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote: On 8/18/07, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you eliminate the use of tables then? I think we just have a couple of them. Allright, with your latest

Re: ListenOnly modules really needed?

2007-08-19 Thread seventh guardian
On 8/18/07, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 09:22:44PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote: I don't like ListenOnly modules because it's dependent on how modules talk with fvwm at present. I'd really prefer a mechanism that can't cripple us in the future. And IMHO

Re: New 2.5.22 release?

2007-08-19 Thread Viktor Griph
On 8/19/07, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:42:15AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:09:46PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote: On 8/18/07, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you eliminate the use of tables then? I think we just have

Re: ListenOnly modules really needed?

2007-08-19 Thread seventh guardian
On 8/18/07, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 09:22:44PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote: I don't like ListenOnly modules because it's dependent on how modules talk with fvwm at present. I'd really prefer a mechanism that can't cripple us in the future. And IMHO