Re: FVWM: What's next to do?

2009-02-27 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:49:00PM +, Thomas Adam wrote: Hello, I realise this might seem controversial, and indeed this question has come up from time to time, but this time I will ask it and give proposals; the question is: When will FVWM 2.5.X go stable? The simple truth is:

CVS tadam: Shuffle todo-2.6 around.

2009-02-27 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: tadam 09/02/27 17:40:34 Modified files: docs : ChangeLog todo-2.6 Log message: Shuffle todo-2.6 around. This deprecates the Closed recently section, moving all entries therein under Closed.

Re: FVWM: What's next to do?

2009-02-27 Thread Thomas Adam
Hello -- 2009/2/27 Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de: On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:49:00PM +, Thomas Adam wrote: Hello, I realise this might seem controversial, and indeed this question has come up from time to time, but this time I will ask it and give proposals; the question is: When

Re: FVWM: What's next to do?

2009-02-27 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 12:28:11AM +, Thomas Adam wrote: Hello -- 2009/2/27 Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de: On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:49:00PM +, Thomas Adam wrote: [snip] I've spent about the last three hours looking through the Jitterbug (which is a disaster in usability and

Re: FVWM: What's next to do?

2009-02-27 Thread Dan Espen
Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de writes: On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 12:28:11AM +, Thomas Adam wrote: Can we then officially retire the Jitterbug? It's awful, no longer maintained upstream, and frankly we had a much better success rate tracking bugs on this mailing list. That's fine with