Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...Setup Form

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:08:24PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > What they gain, and what it was meant for, is new users curious about > Fvwm. Without a config, the casual user will get no where > and most likely look somewhere else. > The WM came up and you couldn't even create a window. > Previous

[fvwmorg/fvwm] 59be5a: TODO: add section for perllib

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm Commit: 59be5aedd7ba55e2aa1887f4bb356588934ce0f8 https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/59be5aedd7ba55e2aa1887f4bb356588934ce0f8 Author: Thomas Adam Date: 2016-06-02 (Thu, 02 Jun 2016) Changed

[fvwmorg/fvwm] 0cb90a: Merge pull request #7 from fvwmorg/ta/todo

Branch: refs/heads/ta/todo Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm Commit: 0cb90aa0a2015691e964b5de6aeba9411286e1a6 https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/0cb90aa0a2015691e964b5de6aeba9411286e1a6 Author: Thomas Adam Date: 2016-06-02 (Thu, 02

Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...

2016-05-19 17:18 GMT+02:00 Thomas Adam : > As I understand it, FVWM was written with extensibility in mind, and hence > could be extended through the use of modules. Although the core of FVWM is > quite a bit larger now (read: some of the things ther could be modules, but >

Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:25:22PM +0200, Thomas Funk wrote: > On 06/02/2016 10:53 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: > > Perl is my $DAYJOB, I'm more than capable. It's just low on my list. > I don't want to offend you with my offer ... I'm only want to relieve you Oh, not at all. But there's a lot more

Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...

On 06/02/2016 10:53 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: Perl is my $DAYJOB, I'm more than capable. It's just low on my list. I don't want to offend you with my offer ... I'm only want to relieve you But hey, no prob ... Best, Thomas -- -- "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and

Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 10:50:50PM +0200, Thomas Funk wrote: > That's not completely true because Gtk3-Perl isn't that stable as Gtk2-perl. > That's the point why I decided to use Gtk2-perl for SimpleGtk2 [0]. There're > not much examples and documentation available as for Gtk2-perl. Gtk3-perl >

Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...

On 06/02/2016 10:39 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: It has to transition to GTK3. Otherwise it's just as stale as GTK1.x is now in terms of how well it has not been maintained. That's not completely true because Gtk3-Perl isn't that stable as Gtk2-perl. That's the point why I decided to use Gtk2-perl

Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 10:35:48PM +0200, Thomas Funk wrote: > I'm using its code as a base for a Fvwm module to use SimpleGtk2 for my > Fvwm-Nightshade GUIs invoked by Fvwm. It isn't a problem for me that you have > removed it but it shows very nice how to create a module derived from >

Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 03:07:27PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > In the case of FvwmForm and the Setup Form, I think you've eliminated > something that I remember at least one poster using. It's not the > best part of Fvwm, but the Setup Form gets a certain class of users > from befuddled to a

Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...

Thomas Adam writes: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:44:23PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: >> If you want to open this can of worms, I think some streamlining might >> be in order, that's up to you. I think it's a very good thing that Fvwm >> has at least a minimal way to create a

Re: Questions how to contribute to fvwmorg.github.io

On 2 Jun 2016 5:27 p.m., "Thomas Funk" wrote: > > On 06/02/2016 06:09 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: >> >> You should read my previous emails on documentation to this list. > > > you refer to https://www.mail-archive.com/fvwm-workers@lists.math.uh.edu/msg15756.html ? Yes. > >> You should

Re: Questions how to contribute to fvwmorg.github.io

On 06/02/2016 06:09 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: You should read my previous emails on documentation to this list. you refer to https://www.mail-archive.com/fvwm-workers@lists.math.uh.edu/msg15756.html ? You should look at: manpages/fvwm.rst So the preferred format is rst, right?

Re: Questions how to contribute to fvwmorg.github.io

On 2 June 2016 at 17:06, Thomas Funk wrote: > No prob. Which documents you've meant? the manpages in bin ? Or others? > If so, how should I added the files? For example fvwm.bug.1.in ... create > a new one named fvwm.bug.md.in? You should read my previous emails on documentation

Re: Questions how to contribute to fvwmorg.github.io

On 06/02/2016 05:49 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: On 2 June 2016 at 16:38, Thomas Funk wrote: Hi Jaimos, I want to implement the missing 'allCommands' and the linkings in fvwm.man to the website. I've cloned master and created a new branch tf/allCommands-linked-fvwm.man I'd rather