Re: Default Configuration File

2016-10-23 Thread Jaimos Skriletz
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Dan Espen wrote: > > > I have a few comments, > > 1) Wall paper changing isn't working. > > 2) The right panel goes all the way to the bottom of the screen > but it's empty. I don't like it wasting space. > ​There was some issues modifying

[fvwmorg/fvwm] aa6cf4: Changes to be committed:

2016-10-23 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/default-config Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm Commit: aa6cf4cf9291f4bcf6efc61bd46edb15a31bff94 https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/aa6cf4cf9291f4bcf6efc61bd46edb15a31bff94 Author: somiaj Date: 2016-10-23 (Sun, 23 Oct

Re: Default Configuration File

2016-10-23 Thread Dan Espen
Thomas Adam writes: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:09:47AM -0600, Jaimos Skriletz wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Thomas has asked me to help with a default configuration file and this is >> what I have come up with. >> >> http://fvwmforums.org/fvwm-default-config.tar.gz >> >> That file

[fvwmorg/fvwm] bb35ad: Add default-config to fvwm

2016-10-23 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/default-config Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm Commit: bb35adba0c417a8b477d33523ac3d8ffb5efac3e https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/bb35adba0c417a8b477d33523ac3d8ffb5efac3e Author: Thomas Adam Date: 2016-10-24 (Mon, 24 Oct 2016)

[fvwmorg/fvwm] d5eb11: Add default-config to fvwm

2016-10-23 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/default-config Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm Commit: d5eb113f03c816a1b9a289cacf80497f6b47 https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/d5eb113f03c816a1b9a289cacf80497f6b47 Author: Thomas Adam Date: 2016-10-24 (Mon, 24 Oct 2016)

[fvwmorg/fvwm] 869ad4: Add default-config to fvwm

2016-10-23 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/default-config Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm Commit: 869ad41e10840a1f99da86013a22e1b4ab2d93c0 https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/869ad41e10840a1f99da86013a22e1b4ab2d93c0 Author: Thomas Adam Date: 2016-10-23 (Sun, 23 Oct 2016)

Re: Default Configuration File

2016-10-23 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:09:47AM -0600, Jaimos Skriletz wrote: > Hello, > > Thomas has asked me to help with a default configuration file and this is > what I have come up with. > > http://fvwmforums.org/fvwm-default-config.tar.gz > > That file extracts to fvwm-default-config/ and to use copy

[fvwmorg/fvwm] 5e9298: Add default-config to fvwm

2016-10-23 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/default-config Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm Commit: 5e9298b92b272e6bb63177cf3e8657032273a055 https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/5e9298b92b272e6bb63177cf3e8657032273a055 Author: Thomas Adam Date: 2016-10-23 (Sun, 23 Oct 2016)

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Viktor Griph
2016-10-23 17:05 GMT+02:00 Dominik Vogt : > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 04:39:53PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote: >> Den 23 okt. 2016 14:36 skrev "Dominik Vogt" : >> > void fev_sanitise_configure_request(XConfigureRequestEvent *cr) >> > { >> >

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 04:10:25PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 04:05:03PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > I never can remember this; is it safe (in C) to assume that > > negative integers are stored in two-complement format? (Of course > > the old code makes the same

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 04:05:03PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > I never can remember this; is it safe (in C) to assume that > negative integers are stored in two-complement format? (Of course > the old code makes the same assumtion, but it's broken and I want > to fix it.) It is not safe to make

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 04:39:53PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote: > Den 23 okt. 2016 14:36 skrev "Dominik Vogt" : > > void fev_sanitise_configure_request(XConfigureRequestEvent *cr) > > { > > if (cr->value_mask & CWX) > > { > >

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Viktor Griph
Den 23 okt. 2016 14:36 skrev "Dominik Vogt" : > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:56:31PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 23:29 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:26:50PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > > >> On

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread zlists
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 13:25 (+0100), Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:56:31PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 23:29 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:26:50PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: On Sun, Jul 17, 2016

[fvwmorg/fvwm] 968357: Fix sanitising XConfigureRequest and XConfigureNot...

2016-10-23 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/dv/fix-cr-merging Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm Commit: 96835762f45eaf844dab14754a9694bbd1c55fbe https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/96835762f45eaf844dab14754a9694bbd1c55fbe Author: Dominik Vogt Date: 2016-10-23 (Sun, 23 Oct

[fvwmorg/fvwm] ec8588: Fix sanitising XConfigureRequest and XConfigureNot...

2016-10-23 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/dv/fix-cr-merging Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm Commit: ec8588fc8f96b08105f973b23b7943aa216205f2 https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/ec8588fc8f96b08105f973b23b7943aa216205f2 Author: Dominik Vogt Date: 2016-10-23 (Sun, 23 Oct

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 01:36:03PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 08:36:10PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 00:20 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:56:31PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > > >> I cloned

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 08:36:10PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 00:20 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:56:31PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: > >> I cloned the git version about 15 minutes ago and compiled it, and > >> acroread

[fvwmorg/fvwm] 1f45da: FvwmButtons: Fix infinite loop with Silent

2016-10-23 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm Commit: 1f45da61792db76a50b40eb22d6510b0f4bc533d https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/1f45da61792db76a50b40eb22d6510b0f4bc533d Author: Thomas Adam Date: 2016-10-23 (Sun, 23 Oct 2016)

[fvwmorg/fvwm] 1f45da: FvwmButtons: Fix infinite loop with Silent

2016-10-23 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/ta/fvwmbuttons-colorset Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm Commit: 1f45da61792db76a50b40eb22d6510b0f4bc533d https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/1f45da61792db76a50b40eb22d6510b0f4bc533d Author: Thomas Adam Date: 2016-10-23 (Sun, 23

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread zlists
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 02:44 (+0100), Dominik Vogt wrote: > As a little bit of explanation how to read this output: Thanks for the tutorial! >> cre: 935(1) 0(2) 985(0)x1080(0) fw 0x00401005 w 0x06200031 ew 0x06200031 >> 'Adobe Reader' >^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^ > X

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:51:52AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:13:59AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > I'm now trying to identify the commit with which this strange > > placement started. Do you know of any other commit ids or dates > > between 2.6.5 and 2.6.6 that were

Re: [fvwmorg/fvwm] 58d1a6: NEWS: formatting tweaks

2016-10-23 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 06:42:08PM -0700, GitHub wrote: > Branch: refs/heads/ta/reluctant-news > Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm > Commit: 58d1a64671c12e93554dd48e6112f6c6e0d921ed > > https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/58d1a64671c12e93554dd48e6112f6c6e0d921ed > Author:

[fvwmorg/fvwm] 355c4c: FvwmButtons: Fix infinite loop with Silent

2016-10-23 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/ta/fvwmbuttons-colorset Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm Commit: 355c4cb1a9729ac02214d20fc3aa61e27d0fb0a5 https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/355c4cb1a9729ac02214d20fc3aa61e27d0fb0a5 Author: Thomas Adam Date: 2016-10-23 (Sun, 23

Re: regression from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 ?

2016-10-23 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:13:59AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > I'm now trying to identify the commit with which this strange > placement started. Do you know of any other commit ids or dates > between 2.6.5 and 2.6.6 that were definitely fine or broken? Whoever ends up doing this, should use

Re: Final long term stable version

2016-10-23 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:46:23AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > The old stable branch should provide important fixes for people > who use old versions, and that includes not taking away stuff from > them, no? The idea is that people who have some good (but rare) > reason to stick with the old

Re: Final long term stable version

2016-10-23 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 03:22:08AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 03:12:19AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 01:19:57PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:20:25PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > I am looking at releasing 2.6.7