Re: Future image support

2016-10-17 Thread Dan Espen
Dominik Vogt writes: > During the discussion of mandarory or optional PNG support I've > started wondering if we *really* need a multitude of different > image format support in the core and the modules. > > At the moment, there's a plugin like image loading and maintenance

Re: Future image support

2016-10-17 Thread Thomas Adam
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:33:00PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > The Imagemagick approach is probably too slow and unreliable, but > the second should be doable with well designed inter process > communication (which needs a redesign anyway). Uploading Pixmaps > to the server before they can be

Future image support

2016-10-17 Thread Dominik Vogt
During the discussion of mandarory or optional PNG support I've started wondering if we *really* need a multitude of different image format support in the core and the modules. At the moment, there's a plugin like image loading and maintenance layer in the library that takes care or reading