On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 11:02:16PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 10:55:39PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > OK, this looks better. Thanks!
> >
> > GCC/Clang don't moan at these changes, which is good. The changes built via
> > travis-ci just fine.
> >
> > I say you're good
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 10:55:39PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> OK, this looks better. Thanks!
>
> GCC/Clang don't moan at these changes, which is good. The changes built via
> travis-ci just fine.
>
> I say you're good to merge to master.
Good. I think I've also figured out how these safety
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 10:53:10PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> Different approach at fixing the warning. Hopefully this one
> works without removing any "uninitialised variable" warnings. The
> macro SUPPRESS_UNUSED_VAR_WARNING(var) from config.h is used to
> remove the "set but not used"
Different approach at fixing the warning. Hopefully this one
works without removing any "uninitialised variable" warnings. The
macro SUPPRESS_UNUSED_VAR_WARNING(var) from config.h is used to
remove the "set but not used" warning in the discussed case.
I've forced a new version of the branch
