Re: StackTransientParent race condition

2007-01-17 Thread Viktor Griph
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:59:58PM +0100, Viktor Griph wrote: If an application itself tries to implement some kind of similar feature, and does it in a simple (and bad) way it may result in a race condition between fvwm and that app. I believe this is

Re: StackTransientParent race condition

2007-01-17 Thread Viktor Griph
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Viktor Griph wrote: On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote: [snip] It's not that I don't trust your code quality, but the stacking code is very difficult to understand and very easy to break. Yes, I've noticed this. And as you see I actually found a bug while writing

Re: StackTransientParent race condition

2007-01-16 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:59:58PM +0100, Viktor Griph wrote: If an application itself tries to implement some kind of similar feature, and does it in a simple (and bad) way it may result in a race condition between fvwm and that app. I believe this is what Apple Shake is doing based on

Re: StackTransientParent race condition

2007-01-11 Thread Viktor Griph
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Viktor Griph wrote: ...If this raise isn't to the topmost layer... I mean is to the topmost layer /Viktor