2009/3/14 Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de:
[...]
As far as I remeber:
* deb and rpm: We got bug reports that nobody took care of.
* html documentation: It's mostly unusable for me and way too
complex. There are be other, simpler ways to achive the same
benefits (asciidoc?).
i'm
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:13:21AM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
2009/3/14 Dominik Vogt dominik.v...@gmx.de:
But this is almost thrust upon existing developers. Dominik, you
obviously fall into this category: could you fix something in perllib
or FvwmTabs if it broke?
No, I couldn't.
Ciao
2009/3/14 Mikhael Goikhman m...@homemail.com:
[...]
One of the examples of a pragmatical asciidoc that may be considered is
POD (Plain_Old_Documentation article in Wikipadia). Well, all perl
documentation in fvwm is already in POD, and the corresponding html is
generated from it.
That's
On 14 Mar 2009 15:34:52 +, Thomas Adam wrote:
2009/3/14 Mikhael Goikhman m...@homemail.com:
[...]
One of the examples of a pragmatical asciidoc that may be considered is
POD (Plain_Old_Documentation article in Wikipadia). Well, all perl
documentation in fvwm is already in POD,
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:15:03AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:34:38PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
* FvwmProxy: unfinished and unmaintained
Please send me the location of any feature requests or bug reports.
Here's my list.
1. don't reorder others in group on
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:24:57PM -0700, jpwe...@imonk.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:15:03AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:34:38PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
* FvwmProxy: unfinished and unmaintained
Please send me the location of any feature
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:44:27AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:24:57PM -0700, jpwe...@imonk.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:15:03AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:34:38PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
* FvwmProxy: unfinished and
