On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:35:21PM +, seventh guardian wrote:
The DeadPipe signal handling is actually done by an empty function. Is
there any future use for it? Or is it just a relic and may be removed
from the code?
It may or may not be a relic of older code, but one basic idea of
the
On 12/31/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:35:21PM +, seventh guardian wrote:
The DeadPipe signal handling is actually done by an empty function. Is
there any future use for it? Or is it just a relic and may be removed
from the code?
It may or may not
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 12:48:08AM +, seventh guardian wrote:
On 12/31/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:35:21PM +, seventh guardian wrote:
The DeadPipe signal handling is actually done by an empty function. Is
there any future use for it? Or is it
On 12/31/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 12:48:08AM +, seventh guardian wrote:
On 12/31/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:35:21PM +, seventh guardian wrote:
The DeadPipe signal handling is actually done by an empty
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 01:13:26AM +, seventh guardian wrote:
On 12/31/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 12:48:08AM +, seventh guardian wrote:
On 12/31/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:35:21PM +, seventh guardian
