Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...Setup Form

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 06:20:22PM -0600, Jaimos Skriletz wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Thomas Adam wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:21:51AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > > Any lasting objections before this is merged and we can move onto the next > > phase with

Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...Setup Form

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Thomas Adam wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:21:51AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > Any lasting objections before this is merged and we can move onto the next > phase with is introducing a default configuration? > > ​I have some ideas on a default

Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...Setup Form

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:21:51AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > We put in place something different. We've had proposals about that in the > past (Nick Fortune). I'm wanting to hear from others about what that might > look like. Call for last orders, Gentlemen... Any lasting objections before

Re: Deprecation: Let's talk once more about removing $STUFF...Setup Form

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:08:24PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > What they gain, and what it was meant for, is new users curious about > Fvwm. Without a config, the casual user will get no where > and most likely look somewhere else. > The WM came up and you couldn't even create a window. > Previous