Hi Mikhael,
DefineFunc would behave much like AddToFunc except for 3 differences:
1. It would generate a warning message if the function already existed.
This is bad. Configs should usually be re-read-able. Instead, it should
silently apply DestroyFunc. In fact, DefineFunc (combining
Just to clarify ...
In my opinion, it's not Schedule that is broken/unreliable. _Any_
function may fail to execute if the pointer is grabbed for ~1 second
at the time of execution.
It doesn't matter if a function is invoked by Schedule or not - it
can still fail to execute in either case.
On 6/28/06, Scott Smedley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mikhael,
DefineFunc would behave much like AddToFunc except for 3 differences:
1. It would generate a warning message if the function already existed.
This is bad. Configs should usually be re-read-able. Instead, it should
silently
Scott Smedley a écrit :
Hi Dominik et al,
This post follows on from the previous ModuleListenOnly command
which was getting a bit off-topic.
As a hack/compromise, maybe we could modify AddToFunc to keep track
of whether or not it uses a mouse modifier only then grab the
X server, in
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:12:21AM +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
Hi Mikhael,
DefineFunc would behave much like AddToFunc except for 3 differences:
1. It would generate a warning message if the function already existed.
This is bad. Configs should usually be re-read-able. Instead, it
Olivier Chapuis spake unto us the following wisdom:
- Executing the function without trying to grab at all. You suggest to
add such possibility.
- Try to grab just 2 times (this is really fast). If the grab succeed
everything is ok. If it fails execute the function any way. This is
maybe
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 01:50:30PM +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
Hi Dominik,
That's just one purpose of the command. I was always fond of the
idea to prototype or even implement modules as shell scripts.
Yes, that would be cool. IMHO, I think it would be prudent to create
bashlib (akin
On 29 Jun 2006 00:44:22 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
I agree that a failed grab can cause lots of problems. Hopefully
it's clear that many immediate functions may need the grab too.
But I have no idea how to decide if a certain function needs it or
not. The only way would be to write a
On 29 Jun 2006 00:24:50 +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
Just to clarify ...
In my opinion, it's not Schedule that is broken/unreliable. _Any_
function may fail to execute if the pointer is grabbed for ~1 second
at the time of execution.
It doesn't matter if a function is invoked by
