On Thursday 06 July 2006 16:19, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:23:50PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 7/6/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch looks fine. I'll commit it. By the way, do you have
commit privileges for CVS?
No, I don't.. Am I ready for
On Sun, 4 May 2003 19:34:42 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 12:05:31PM -0400, Bob Woodside wrote:
Dominik - I'm curious whether Uwe's latest changes made any
difference
in the pager resizing quirk for you.
Yes, it looks better now. I get the pager
I'm starting a new thread on this. There were too many different
subjects under the old one, and it was getting unmanageable (at least
for my feeble brain and eyes). I think that any discussion on the new
class structure should now also migrate to a new thread, and likewise
discussion of
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:48:54 -0400
Dan Espen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I run FvwmIdent with:
*FvwmIdent: Back Black
*FvwmIdent: Fore white
*FvwmIdent: Font 9x15bold
no problem here, but I missed the version
you had the problem with.
I don't get any errors running with current CVS.
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 07:43:40 +0200
Olivier Chapuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, that's the bug.
...
Is the intent that order matters (i.e., that Back or Fore should
override a previously specified colorset), or that the colorset
should override Back/Fore regardless of the order? (My
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 13:16:17 +0200
Uwe Pross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
On 28 Apr 2003 at 10:40:54 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Any ideas why the new web page takes 30 seconds on my ISDN
line to load?
All files together loaded when requesting
www.fvwm.org/index.php are 122880
Hi --
Using the almost current CVS (I last updated sometime yesterday
afternoon), I find that FvwmIdent consistently fails. The following
error is logged:
X Error of failed request: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or
Window parameter)
Major opcode of failed request: 55 (X_CreateGC)
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:52:48 +0200
Olivier Chapuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've installed an X error handler to FvwmIdent. Now FvwmIdent should
core dump, the gdb output may help us to determine if this error is
acceptable or not. I guess that if you remove the #if 0 code of
FvwmIdent.c
On Sat, 26 Apr 2003 00:37:55 +
Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you set decoration windows to be 800 pixels tall - to always
force a side scrollbar? An empty window taller than the page looks
very bad.
This was a quick 'n dirty hack several weeks ago when the few
I was going to send Matt Chapman a message about the WM comparison
chart on his Window Managers for X site and remove the dumb
Developers' note I left on our Links page, but a couple of questions
occurred to me.
1) He has a link to an FVWM2 THEMES page
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 07:28:27 -0400
Dan Espen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Woodside [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) My original intent was to tell him that in the comparison
chart he should check FVWM as having pinnable
(or tear-off) menus (which, ahem, would make
FVWM the only WM
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:35:29 +0200
Grzegorz Nieweglowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The W3C standards are:
* alt is used by text-mode browsers to display a description of
what
you would see if your browser could display images
* alt is also displayed by graphical browsers if image
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:10:17 +
Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am starting the new thread, because the thread depth of 25 is
getting ridiculous. Problems:
The ALT property of mini icons in the pager should be , otherwise
some browsers (at least Opera) use this name initially
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:40:04 -0400
Bob Woodside [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:10:17 +
Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ALT property of mini icons in the pager should be , otherwise
some browsers (at least Opera) use this name initially before the
icons
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 13:43:22 +0200
Uwe Pross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dv I don't get the connection between a close window button
dv and the change layout function either.
uwp I put it on the x to close the window decoration. To put
uwp it there was thought to be a fancy hidden feature.
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 14:21:49 +
Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
uwp This a layout suggestion in the style of fvwm vector
uwp buttons. It shows a possible fvwm window decoration. We may
uwp add more or less buttons if or use graphical window
uwp decoration like:
uwp
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:55:47 +
Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 Apr 2003 17:08:08 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
... but currently we have no logo on the page. This is a must.
But we will have a new logo only on August 1 accourding to your plan.
I prefer to be without a
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 21:22:32 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've attached a screen shot that shows grey bars between the
window border and the title (same with the pager). And there are
thick black bars between the desks of the pager. Not sure if
they are there on purpose, but I think at
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003 23:07:21 +0200
Uwe Pross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think mozilla is the only one which can do this.?
Hmm...it turns out that Netscape 7, Netscape 6 (at least 6.2), and
Opera 7 also support this, so there should be a lot of people who can
use the feature. (Now, if I
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 20:20:06 -0500
Bob Woodside [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consider...our little microcosm of the FVWM developer community...
we have all become victims of this war in our own small way...
regardless of where we live, our political leanings or ethical
principles, or whether we
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 00:27:17 +
Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I urge everyone to stop all unnecessary run-ins.
Noone will win from ultimatums and wars.
Let's show we can do it peacefully without losing people.
I think that's the finest thing we could do to promote peace
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 00:43:31 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...who of the subscribers of the original message would sign
it and who would not?
This release is dedicated to the victims of the war in Iraq that
began in March, 2003. The following people, many of them users
or developers
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 00:00:02 +
Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will subscribe under this.
Can I suggest this wording to make it clear it is not political?
This release is dedicated to the victims of the war in Iraq that
began in March, 2003. The following people,
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:46:16 +0100
Uwe Pross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. I have pulled the fvwm-web tree from cvs and put
it at
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm-web/
The new php-files have been added to this directory. Since
our web server serves php before html I have
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 20:36:14 +0100
Uwe Pross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Bob Woodside wrote:
Actually, your server's order wouldn't be a
problem. I'd call the home page index.php.
Should be done by this mail has been sent.
Yes, I'd already noticed
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 07:45:40 +0100
Uwe Pross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UP We may also need a new cvs tree which does not belong to the
UP fvwm-package.
Could you elaborate on what you might need? I can give you another
module or a completely separate repository if you need it.
Bob
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 10:31:11 +0100
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org wrote:
At the moment, I am a bit unhappy with the window like layout.
Take a look at
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm_web_site/features.php
Is it just me, or does anybody else find the text arranged in
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 10:49:10 +0100
Uwe Pross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changed. At the moment I am playing around with the web
sites. There are several things I don't like on the current
design
Hooray! I'm glad to see they finally got your directory back online.
I'll
Uwe Pross [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Two new versions:
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm_web_site/features.php?decoration_path=decorations/window_deco_icehilight_color_back=slategray
and
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm_web_site
This morning I tried to
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002 02:07:48 -0400
Suzanne Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If/when I receive write access to CVS (I'm waiting for cries of
protest before submitting the request to Jason :-)
No cries of protest, just applause. I think the vote is unanimous
acclamation. Please go
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002 21:31:38 -0500
FVWM CVS fvwm-workers@fvwm.org wrote:
CVSROOT: /home/cvs/fvwm
Module name: fvwm
Changes by: drbob 02/08/22 21:31:38
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
fvwm : events.c focus.c focus.h stack.c stack.h
Log
I just updated from CVS for the first time in a few days, and I find
that
TitleAtLeft now places the title to the right, and TitleAtBottom places it on
top. TitleAtRight continues to work as advertised.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at URL:http://www.fvwm.org/.
To
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:55:52 +0200 (CEST)
Giuseppe Della Ricca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to remember (but I may be wrong !) that focussed window were
conserved not only at 'desk' level, but also at 'page' level, i.e. it was
possible to have one focussed window in each 'page'.
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 17:57:18 +0200
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 03:35:43PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 19 Aug 2002 15:26:49 +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
All 3 work. -n is even stronger than -T.
Window name does work for style matching. :)
Um,
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 16:41:07 +0200
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 04:33:19PM +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Dominik, I saw that you closed that bug. I agree - for the loosing windows
part.
The ignoring _NET_WM_DESKTOP part is still an open bug, IMO.
I
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 10:27:50 +0200
Dominik Vogt fvwm@fvwm.org wrote:
Changes by: drbob 02/07/22 11:42:08
Hey Bob! You're back! Nice to see you again. :-)
Good to be back. I hope I can be more active than I've been over the
past year!
BTW, if the problem you fixed with
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:21:39 +0200
Dominik Vogt fvwm@fvwm.org wrote:
In the best tradition of the great style flag rewrite I'm now
planning the great focus policy rewrite (GFPR) :-)
Whew! I sense another round of grab code rewriting in the offing. Maybe
this'll
make the code a bit
Dominik Vogt wrote:
Today, many innocent lifes were ended forcefully by the savage
terrorist attacks in New York, Washington D.C and Pittsburgh.
peaking not only for myself but for the users and developers of
fvwm, I wish to express the deepest sympathy with all victims,
their beraved
Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 05:39:22PM -0400, Bob Woodside wrote:
Do you know of any more situations that were mishandled?
Any call of f_g_b with is_focused == True is a potential candidate
for another bug. There are many calls like this all over the place
Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 11:58:16PM -0400, Bob Woodside wrote:
Can you describe for me a scenario that I can try, where the code as I
changed it misbehaves?
1) Move the mouse over a sloppyfocus+mousefocusraises window that
is not on top. Restart fvwm
Dominik Vogt wrote:
Bob, I had to restore some of the old logic in focus_grab_buttons().
What I do not understand is your motivation to reverse buttons
grabbing for the focused window. I think you assumed that calling
the function with is_focused == 1 means to ungrab the window -
which is
Dominik Vogt wrote:
However, with your patch, fvwm passes through the for (...) loop
much more often then necessary. Could you try to write some
condition like the former
if (grab_buttons != tmp_win-grabbed_buttons)
to prevent fvwm from entering the loop unnecessarily?
Yeah,
In looking through all the focus code recently I was reminded of
something that has puzzled me for some time. Does anyone know a really
good reason why the window list is reordered two different ways on a
focus change, depending on whether the newly-focused window is
ClickToFocus or
Michael Han wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 10:48:38PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 03:40:26PM -0400, Bob Woodside wrote:
Does anyone know a really good reason why the window list is
reordered two different ways on a focus change, depending on
whether the newly
Bob Woodside wrote:
Well, this one has led me a merry chase...and I'm still chasing.
The problem seems to be mostly confined to focus.c:
focus_grab_buttons,
which doesn't quite work as intended. I've hacked it up to the point
where it does what I think was intended
Well, this one has led me a merry chase...and I'm still chasing.
To recap the problem: it boils down to the need to suppress Xlib's
automatic grab when a mouse button is pressed, and the unwanted
LeaveNotify/EnterNotify
events generated by that grab; and it's the Leave/Enter
Bob Woodside wrote:
Dominik Vogt wrote:
Anyway, if you send me your sample program I'll have a look at the
problem.
Erm...it was attached to the last email. However, ignore it. I'll send
you a revised version, if you like, that reveals more information.
Here's what it shows
Dominik Vogt wrote:
Well, that does not sound strange at all. I guess the widget
window has not selected Enter/Leave events, but it has selected
ButtonPress events. Thus, clicking into the widget window
should generate Enter/LeaveNotify events on the widget window.
If the application
Bob Woodside wrote:
Dominik Vogt wrote:
? On the other hand it seems SuSE 7.2 ships with a much improved
xfm version (1.4.2.patchl04). Perhaps the problem has been solved
there.
Curious...I grabbed the 1.4.2p4 tarball, and it does indeed work.
Their
Changelog mentions
Dominik Vogt wrote:
I see no problem at all. Are you sure you are using
Style * ClickToFocusPassesClick
Yup.
? On the other hand it seems SuSE 7.2 ships with a much improved
xfm version (1.4.2.patchl04). Perhaps the problem has been solved
there.
Curious...I
Hi, all --
After way too long an absence, I finally got around to installing
2.4.0, and discovered that the old no double-clicks getting passed to
xfm and moxfm problem that I fixed back in December of 1999 has
resurfaced, at least partly. This time it only appears to affect
ClickToFocus
Let me add my congratulations on the long-awaited 2.4.0 release. I hate
it that I've not had time lately to be active with the group, but I
still try to follow the mailing list. I'll be grabbing the tarball this
evening.
Congratulations and warm wishes to all who have contributed
52 matches
Mail list logo
