On 30 Oct 2002 11:27:14 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:08:27AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 29 Oct 2002 22:32:53 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 12:25:56PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
[...]
How about renaming this
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 04:56:38PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 30 Oct 2002 11:27:14 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:08:27AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 29 Oct 2002 22:32:53 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 12:25:56PM +,
that it might, say, route packets to other
managers or be used to visualize your firewall, I can be flexible.
To be consistant with existing modules, how about FvwmWinProxy?
Just so I don't have to change the dozens of instances of the
word 'proxy' in the source
what it really does.
To be consistant with existing modules, how about FvwmWinProxy?
Just so I don't have to change the dozens of instances of the
word 'proxy' in the source.
FvwmWinProxy is fine with me although I myself would probably use plural.
Actually, the only module to be consistent
to
FvwmCommandS. I needed to look at the code and configuration to figure out
what it really does.
To be consistant with existing modules, how about FvwmWinProxy?
Just so I don't have to change the dozens of instances of the
word 'proxy' in the source.
FvwmWinProxy is fine with me
