On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 04:45:29AM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
Hi!
The new argb visuals introduced by xorg have a serious drawback, namely,
they don't work correctly unless the toplevel window has an ARGB visual.
With my limited knowledge, I'd say this is a design problem within Xorg, but
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:11:40AM +0100, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://data.plan9.de/fvwm-2.5-argb-visual.patch
Small to medium sized patches can be sent directly to the mailing
list. That makes life for us much easier:
Will do next time.
The other small
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:42:44PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:11:40AM +0100, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://data.plan9.de/fvwm-2.5-argb-visual.patch
Small to medium sized patches can be sent directly to the mailing
list. That makes life for
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:42:44PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:11:40AM +0100, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://data.plan9.de/fvwm-2.5-argb-visual.patch
Small to medium sized patches can be sent directly to the mailing
list. That makes life for
Hi!
The new argb visuals introduced by xorg have a serious drawback, namely,
they don't work correctly unless the toplevel window has an ARGB visual.
With my limited knowledge, I'd say this is a design problem within Xorg, but
I seem to be alone with that notion. This means that each and every
On 2/1/06, Marc Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
The new argb visuals introduced by xorg have a serious drawback, namely,
they don't work correctly unless the toplevel window has an ARGB visual.
With my limited knowledge, I'd say this is a design problem within Xorg, but
I seem to be
