Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:31:00PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:18:41 +0100
seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a way to provide backward compatibility and minimizing the
effects of the
On 8/23/06, Jacob Bachmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:31:00PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:18:41 +0100
seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a way to provide backward
seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/23/06, Jacob Bachmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a possibility for 3.0, could the module interface be reworked perhaps
more extensively?
I had an idea for an ICE-based module interface that would, if well
done, be more flexible and extensible than the current
