Re: Removing EWMH support?

2006-03-27 Thread Olivier Chapuis
Etan Reisner a écrit : Before I comment specifically, I'll introduce myself. I am (at least one) of the other gaim folk Ethan referred to. I also understand the problems with the EWMH for window managers that don't exactly fit into the standard paradigm, I'm an ion3 user. I am also quite

Re: Removing EWMH support?

2006-03-24 Thread Ethan Blanton
Olivier Chapuis spake unto us the following wisdom: Now a note on _NET_CURRENT_DESKTOP (and _NET_DESKTOP_VIEW PORT), the EWMH spec says that this property (as a client msg) is for a pager. Thus if gtk_window_present() uses this property (and one may understand that it uses it in the *view of

Re: Removing EWMH support?

2006-03-24 Thread Olivier Chapuis
Ethan Blanton a écrit : Olivier Chapuis spake unto us the following wisdom: Now a note on _NET_CURRENT_DESKTOP (and _NET_DESKTOP_VIEW PORT), the EWMH spec says that this property (as a client msg) is for a pager. Thus if gtk_window_present() uses this property (and one may understand that it

Re: Removing EWMH support?

2006-03-24 Thread Etan Reisner
Before I comment specifically, I'll introduce myself. I am (at least one) of the other gaim folk Ethan referred to. I also understand the problems with the EWMH for window managers that don't exactly fit into the standard paradigm, I'm an ion3 user. I am also quite interested in getting this

Re: Removing EWMH support?

2006-03-24 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 11:10:00PM +0100, Olivier Chapuis wrote: Ethan Blanton a écrit : Olivier Chapuis spake unto us the following wisdom: Now a note on _NET_CURRENT_DESKTOP (and _NET_DESKTOP_VIEW PORT), the EWMH spec says that this property (as a client msg) is for a pager. Thus if

Re: Removing EWMH support?

2006-03-22 Thread Ethan Blanton
Olivier Chapuis spake unto us the following wisdom: Ethan Blanton a écrit : Patrick Börjesson spake unto us the following wisdom: If there is a bug or misfeature which should be fixed, I would like to know so that I can make sure it is addressed.

Re: Removing EWMH support?

2006-03-22 Thread Olivier Chapuis
Dominik Vogt a écrit : On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 11:41:54PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the FULLSCREEN stuff.

Re: Removing EWMH support?

2006-03-13 Thread George 'Nephrite' Potapov
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 11:41:54PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the FULLSCREEN stuff. Everything else is just

Re: Removing EWMH support?

2006-03-13 Thread Olivier Chapuis
Dominik Vogt a écrit : A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the FULLSCREEN stuff. Everything else is just causing trouble. Reasoning: * Most of the

Re: Removing EWMH support?

2006-03-13 Thread Ahmed Abdalla
Dominik Vogt wrote: A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the FULLSCREEN stuff. Everything else is just causing trouble. Reasoning: * Most of

Re: Removing EWMH support?

2006-03-13 Thread Patrick Börjesson
On 2006-03-12 23:59, Ethan Blanton uttered these thoughts: Dominik Vogt spake unto us the following wisdom: A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is

Re: Removing EWMH support?

2006-03-13 Thread Jim C. Brown
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:58:44PM +0100, Patrick B??rjesson wrote: If there is a bug or misfeature which should be fixed, I would like to know so that I can make sure it is addressed. http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1455264forum_id=665 After reading that thread, this is

Re: Removing EWMH support?

2006-03-13 Thread Pekka Marjola
A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the FULLSCREEN stuff. Everything else is just causing trouble. I remember anxiously waiting for fvwm to better

Re: Removing EWMH support?

2006-03-13 Thread Ethan Blanton
Patrick Börjesson spake unto us the following wisdom: If there is a bug or misfeature which should be fixed, I would like to know so that I can make sure it is addressed. http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1455264forum_id=665 Ahh, this is actually a common problem for us

Re: Removing EWMH support?

2006-03-12 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 11:41:54PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the FULLSCREEN stuff. Everything else is just

Re: Removing EWMH support?

2006-03-12 Thread Jim C. Brown
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 11:41:54PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the FULLSCREEN stuff. Everything else is just

Re: Removing EWMH support?

2006-03-12 Thread Ethan Blanton
Dominik Vogt spake unto us the following wisdom: A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the FULLSCREEN stuff. Everything else is just causing trouble.