On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 01:11:57AM +, Ethan Raynor wrote:
> I can understand personal opinions - they're important and they happen
> all the time with projects, I understand that. But I don't think it is
> very fair to say I should not read it - when I won't know weather it's
> there or not to
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:58:42AM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 01:52:51AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > By the way, any idea why "make distcheck" has never caught the
> > faulty uninstallation of the symlinks?
>
> Nope, no idea.
>
> I find dist/distcheck to be some
Hi,
I can understand personal opinions - they're important and they happen
all the time with projects, I understand that. But I don't think it is
very fair to say I should not read it - when I won't know weather it's
there or not to start with. So I think just not having those
conversations is
Please don't top post on the fvwm lists.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:44:47AM +, Ethan Raynor wrote:
> it's those points i would like to see put elsewhere
I've completely understood that it bothers you. If you don't want
to read it, don't. This is an unavoidable part of public software
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 01:52:51AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> It's still not good. Isn't there a standard Automake way to
> install shell scripts?
IIRC, there's bin_SCRIPTS -- ah, poking around reveals this:
https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Scripts.html
Although we're
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 05:13:22PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 04:09:14PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > Bofore you start working on that, please take a look at the
> > dv/fix-transform-name branch.
>
> OK, this looks good. I'm surprised that FvwmCommand.sh is installed
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:07:42AM +, Ethan Raynor wrote:
> Is it OK to request these sorts of conversations take place someplace
> else?
No.
If there's one place for discussing fvwm development, it's this
mailing list.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt
Hi,
Is it OK to request these sorts of conversations take place someplace
else? I did not know before that there's a lot of heated
conversations. I don't want to have to read these.
Please be considerate. Or agree on something and move on, may be?
Ethan
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 1:43 AM,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 02:03:52PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 04:30:23AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 02:06:19AM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 02:43:13AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > > Why on earth do we have to
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 02:03:52PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 04:30:23AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 02:06:19AM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 02:43:13AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > > Why on earth do we have to
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 02:06:19AM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 02:43:13AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > Why on earth do we have to repeat the mistake of the past by
> > putting the version number in the project name *again*? Every
> > other project manages backwards
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 02:43:13AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> Why on earth do we have to repeat the mistake of the past by
> putting the version number in the project name *again*? Every
> other project manages backwards incompatible releases just fine,
> only fvwm changes its name with each
12 matches
Mail list logo
