Re: Release 2.6.6?

[Thomas Adam]

Hi Dan,

No worries, I can eliminate the 2.7 branch too. You're right, at some point
we'll hit this revision. Sooner to get rid of it than not.

Thanks. I'll release 2.6.6 soon!

Thomas
On 13 Mar 2016 20:03, "Dan Espen" <des...@verizon.net> wrote:

> Thomas Adam <tho...@fvwm.org> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm getting quite a few emails off-list, asking me when 2.6.6 is going
> to be
> > released.  I know it's been a while, so I'm thinking of doing this this
> > evening at some point.
> >
> > Any objections?  The CVS branch seesm stable enough to me.
>
> No objections at all.
> It's long overdue.
>
> Every time I look I get distracted by the 2.7 branch, which should be
> eliminated.  But I don't know how to turn 2.6 into the new head.
> So, just doing 2.6.6 would be fine.
>
> --
> Dan Espen
>
>

Re: Release 2.6.6?

[Dan Espen]

Thomas Adam  writes:

> Hi,
>
> I'm getting quite a few emails off-list, asking me when 2.6.6 is going to be
> released.  I know it's been a while, so I'm thinking of doing this this
> evening at some point.
>
> Any objections?  The CVS branch seesm stable enough to me.

No objections at all.
It's long overdue.

Every time I look I get distracted by the 2.7 branch, which should be
eliminated.  But I don't know how to turn 2.6 into the new head.
So, just doing 2.6.6 would be fine.

-- 
Dan Espen

Release 2.6.6?

[Thomas Adam]

Hi,

I'm getting quite a few emails off-list, asking me when 2.6.6 is going to be
released.  I know it's been a while, so I'm thinking of doing this this
evening at some point.

Any objections?  The CVS branch seesm stable enough to me.

Kindly,
Thomas Adam