On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:31:34PM -0700, elliot s wrote:
> What would be an example of what a user defined function looks like?
> That's where most of the "needs easy reading and editing" happens.
> Also, i would have a space between option and value.
> So -f red, not -fred (who's fred, and
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Thomas Adam wrote:
Secondly, take another look at the document, since it tells you how
functions could be specified.
"the document", if I'm reading the right one, is just a very short sketch
(3-4 pages) with some examples ... compared to the much longer man pages I
<<
BlockA \
line1, \
line2, \
line3, \
line4
Is less visually appealing and can be more difficult locate errors than
BlockB {
line1,
line2,
line3,
line4
}
>>
There's the python method of blockingusing indentation.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:37:41PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:38:27PM -0400, lists-f...@useunix.net wrote:
> > Is it different as in it gets rid of the annoying '\' characters that
> > need to be at the end of every line. Unless you are saying that they
> > aren't
The python method has some serious defficiencies when applied to input files
like .fvwmrc2, i.e. white space you cannot see (space vs tab) matters and cause
read errors that drive you crazy…
IMO, the
BlockB {
line1,
line2,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 07:32:53PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 09:11:51AM -0700, elliot s wrote:
> > > take another look at the document, since it tells you how functions could
> > > be specified.
> >
> > I missed seeing the example, but it was as i thought.
> > A
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:27:47PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:20:50PM -0400, lists-f...@useunix.net wrote:
> > Is it worth considering moving away from line-based processing for
> > entities like functions?
> >
> > Changing the example in the document to something
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:38:27PM -0400, lists-f...@useunix.net wrote:
> Is it different as in it gets rid of the annoying '\' characters that
> need to be at the end of every line. Unless you are saying that they
> aren't necessary?
They're continuation markers. Lots of programs honour those
Branch: refs/heads/ta/new-config-format
Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm
Commit: fd3db67405ebde9662baf2a407304e1f1a3944cc
https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/fd3db67405ebde9662baf2a407304e1f1a3944cc
Author: Thomas Adam
Date: 2016-09-21 (Wed, 21 Sep
Branch: refs/heads/ta/new-config-format
Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm
Commit: 795f4d4a97eb98a7cc523a50dc76df98ab40308b
https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/795f4d4a97eb98a7cc523a50dc76df98ab40308b
Author: Thomas Adam
Date: 2016-09-21 (Wed, 21 Sep
One thing I wouldn't mind added is "here documents". I use FvwmPerl
quite a bit and my config is full of things like
+ I SendToModule perlwops eval \
my ($NEWX, $WIN) = (0, undef); \
foreach $WIN (@b) { \
$NEWX = $WIN->{x}+$WIN->{width} \
... (10 more
Branch: refs/heads/ta/new-config-format
Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm
Commit: 545d7e73d54e3ff054b318e65c96956b27d676d9
https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/545d7e73d54e3ff054b318e65c96956b27d676d9
Author: Thomas Adam
Date: 2016-09-21 (Wed, 21 Sep
How do we request access to the scan results?
Trying to view the link tells me I'm not authorized to access the page.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Thomas Adam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A while ago, I set up the FVWM repository to hook into Coverity [0], who
> specialise in
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:19:10PM -0400, Stephen Dennison wrote:
> How do we request access to the scan results?
>
> Trying to view the link tells me I'm not authorized to access the page.
It looks as though this isn't public. I'll add your email address to the list
of authorised users, and
Branch: refs/heads/ta/new-config-format
Home: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm
Commit: e787ea93554a7174901fda9a8360b501f41189bd
https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/commit/e787ea93554a7174901fda9a8360b501f41189bd
Author: Thomas Adam
Date: 2016-09-21 (Wed, 21 Sep
Hi all,
A while ago, I set up the FVWM repository to hook into Coverity [0], who
specialise in static analysis and allow open source projects to be run against
their tools for free.
To that end the results are in:
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/fvwm/view_defects
I think it's rather
16 matches
Mail list logo