Since this thread has gotten quite chatty:
Thomas Adam wrote (Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 04:02:07PM +0100):
> I did reply back to him -- he wishes us all well, and is delighted that fvwm
> is still continuing.
I can't help wondering aloud what Drew Moseley uses now.
I used to be a twm user at that
Anno domini 2020 Thu, 27 Aug 10:24:24 +0100
Thomas Adam scripsit:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:07:56AM +0200, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
> > None of them have FvwmPrompt in it, not these versions and not the other on
> > the disks.
> >
> > Looks like no version < 2.0.42 ever made it to the
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 03:03:10PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
> Wow, fvwm history that is before my time? (I think.)
I managed to track down Drew Moseley (the original author of FvwmPrompt), and
he had this to say:
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for reaching out. Yes, indeed that was me.
Anno domini 2020 Wed, 26 Aug 19:37:03 +0100
Thomas Adam scripsit:
> Hi,
>
> I'm curious about a piece of Fvwm history. In the git log for fvwm2, the
> initial revision (which is when Jason committed the Fvwm code to CVS), notes
> the following for Fvwm 2.0.41:
>
> Removed FvwmPrompt (use
Anno domini 2020 Wed, 26 Aug 22:06:37 +0100
Thomas Adam scripsit:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 09:19:40PM +0200, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
> > Some more history:
> >
> > sunsite.unc.edu-CD6/X11/window-managers/
> > fvwm-2.0.43.tar.gz 537 KB 12.07.9617:51:56 MESZ
>
> Yes -- this is
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 09:19:40PM +0200, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
> Some more history:
>
> sunsite.unc.edu-CD6/X11/window-managers/
> fvwm-2.0.43.tar.gz537 KB 12.07.9617:51:56 MESZ
Yes -- this is already catered for in what's in the git repositories.
> So 2.0.41 is somewhere
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 03:03:10PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
> Wow, fvwm history that is before my time? (I think.)
I didn't think that was possible! Damn. :)
> All I can come up with is a config file with this:
>
> AddToMenu Module-Popup"Modules" Title
> +
"Dr. Nikolaus Klepp" writes:
> Anno domini 2020 Wed, 26 Aug 19:37:03 +0100
> Thomas Adam scripsit:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm curious about a piece of Fvwm history. In the git log for fvwm2,
>> the initial revision (which is when Jason committed the Fvwm code to
>> CVS), notes the following for Fvwm
Anno domini 2020 Wed, 26 Aug 19:56:03 +0100
Thomas Adam scripsit:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 08:43:45PM +0200, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
> > Anno domini 2020 Wed, 26 Aug 19:37:03 +0100
> > 1998 ... could it be that the SuSE Linux of 1995 has it? I remember I used
> > fvwm95 around that time. I'll
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 08:43:45PM +0200, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
> Anno domini 2020 Wed, 26 Aug 19:37:03 +0100
> 1998 ... could it be that the SuSE Linux of 1995 has it? I remember I used
> fvwm95 around that time. I'll go to archive and check :)
That's not logical. Fvwm95 was a fork. See
Anno domini 2020 Wed, 26 Aug 19:37:03 +0100
Thomas Adam scripsit:
> Hi,
>
> I'm curious about a piece of Fvwm history. In the git log for fvwm2, the
> initial revision (which is when Jason committed the Fvwm code to CVS), notes
> the following for Fvwm 2.0.41:
>
> Removed FvwmPrompt (use
Anno domini 2020 Wed, 26 Aug 19:37:03 +0100
Thomas Adam scripsit:
> Hi,
>
> I'm curious about a piece of Fvwm history. In the git log for fvwm2, the
> initial revision (which is when Jason committed the Fvwm code to CVS), notes
> the following for Fvwm 2.0.41:
>
> Removed FvwmPrompt (use
12 matches
Mail list logo
