Hi Sergio, in fact, I think that my problem is the controller raid and specific
G4 controller Integrated Smart Array 6i.
I've not try to use my Build 121 on the G4 yet, why the hardware is arriving..
I have read on this list people encountered problems with array driver using
old build of
Well, I had experience with the G4's Smart Array 6i on R60, and it worked
perfect.
I understand you will be installing R55, but if you are willing to upgrade,
I can assure you will avoid having problems.
Regards
On 1/25/07, Scarpati Massimiliano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Sergio, in fact,
We have Checkpoint Express FW-1 NG AI R55 with Hotfix 18 running on an HP
ML370 G3 server with 1GB memory.
For several weeks now the server has been crashing fairly regularly, at
random, with fw.sys identified as the culprit in the BSOD. This only
happens Monday to Friday during office working
Chris,
A BSOD is a bug or a hardware fault. If it's always the same code and
address then it almost certainly isn't hardware. Hardware caused BSOD's
tend to result in a wide variety of BSOD codes and addresses.
The fact that it's always fw.sys makes it easier to debug, as it's
always
Can you send the complete text of the BSOD. For example
IRQL_YADAYADAYADA
And the stop codes please
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 [mailto:FW-1-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bunyan, Chris - shb
account
Sent: January 25, 2007 7:50 AM
To:
Fellow Gurus -
Has anybody ever implemented a Websense UFP rule with Client Auth? I am
wondering if the following setup will work:
Group_of_Nets | ANY | http-Websense_UFP | Reject | Log | Note: Websense
Block rule with URI Resource
Group_of_Users | ANY | http | Client Auth | Log | Note: HTTP
never mind. I got it to work.
thanks
On 1/25/07, fwguru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fellow Gurus -
Has anybody ever implemented a Websense UFP rule with Client Auth? I am
wondering if the following setup will work:
Group_of_Nets | ANY | http-Websense_UFP | Reject | Log | Note: Websense
How did you get it to work???
Roger Herr
WhyNot? Consulting Services
24165 IH 10 West Suite 217-183
San Antonio, Texas 78257
210-860-3990
Some men see things as they are and say why?
I dream things that never were and say Why Not?
-Robert F.
what do you think happened for it to work ?
On 1/25/07, fwguru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
never mind. I got it to work.
thanks
On 1/25/07, fwguru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fellow Gurus -
Has anybody ever implemented a Websense UFP rule with Client Auth? I am
wondering if the following
Does Client Auth work with Resources?
I before tried and I remember that is incompatible.
Client Auth doesn't work with resource, almost in earlier version that R62.
In R62 authentication work with resource but doesn't with HTTP proto.
Claudia Cordova
Soporte Tecnico
-Mensaje original-
Rules and config remained as-is. I switched the Client Auth config from
Manual to Partially Automatic. It was an oversight on my part. That worked
immediately. In Manual mode, they'd HTTP to port 900, then the FW would
allow only one connection and fail on all other attempts. Partially
Start a consolidation session.
Ted Serreyn
Serreyn Network Services, LLC
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of CPSecurity
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 4:21 PM
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM
Subject:
Check NAT, check that the edge box is defined properly on the management
station and you have pushed the policy to any firewall that you talk
thru/to.
Once that is done make sure the 9280 and 9282 packets are actually getting
to the management station. If this is the first one you have done, you
What version of Windows and SP level?
No, exceeding the license count is only supposed to generate log entries.
I've never heard otherwise.
The ML370-G3 is about three years old, isn't it? Have you tried running one
of HP's firmware update CD's on it?
Ray
From: Bunyan, Chris - shb
We need to change passwords of administrators defined using
the 'cpconfig' command line interface. In R55, when given
the choice, you ask to add a new administrator, but chose
the name of an existing one. You then can change the password
and other characteristics.
In R60, the only option given by
Critics used to bang Check Point with the fact that anybody with physical
access to the SmartCenter server could do whatever they wanted to the
adminitrator users of the firewall and considered this a major
vulnerability, therefore starting from NGX, you create a single admin user
from the CLI
Ted Serreyn a écrit :
Check NAT, check that the edge box is defined properly on the management
station and you have pushed the policy to any firewall that you talk
thru/to.
Once that is done make sure the 9280 and 9282 packets are actually getting
to the management station. If this is the
17 matches
Mail list logo
