Hi,
I've just upgraded an IP265 from IPSO 3.9 build 41 to 4.0 build 30 and
have now lost tcp/ip connectivity with the box.
Via the console I can go into clish and view the interfaces info. I had
configured eth3c0 for Voyager access previously but it now looks like
this (why there is a smiley
hi,
is fw1 active? try to run cpstop.
you can also run from the shell tcpdump -ni eth3c0 to see if you
receive any packets on the box. maybe you have a problem with
10/100Mbit, full/half-duplex.
br
reinhard
At 11:41 15.02.2007, you wrote:
Hi,
I've just upgraded an IP265 from IPSO 3.9
Thanks Rajeev, I got it all now, thanks to you :) Little Sascha is happy now!
Cheers
Sascha
=
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
Hi Rajeev,
Thanks for the reply. But this message is for the SC Server only. All the
modules are reporting proper status. No new FW's have been added.
Anything else we can check for.
Cheers,
B
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL
hi,
you can reset the config by running rm /config/active and then
reboot the box. it will start again by asking for hostname.
br
reinhard
At 12:20 15.02.2007, you wrote:
Hi Reinhard,
Fw1 is not running.
When I run tcpdump I get
# tcpdump -ni eth3c0
tcpdump: /dev/bpf100: No such file or
Nick Whitworth a écrit :
Hi Reinhard,
Fw1 is not running.
When I run tcpdump I get
# tcpdump -ni eth3c0
tcpdump: /dev/bpf100: No such file or directory
#
Any other ideas? Do you know how I can wipe the config so that I get
back to the initial configuration prompts?
rm /config/active
hi,
this look like you have lost the specialfile to access the kernel driver
try to reboot first!
Cheers
--
From: Nick Whitworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM
To:
I have run rm /config/active and rebooted. During the setup, no interfaces
appear to be configurable. Any ideas? How can I view the logs you are talking
about?
You can configure your system in two ways:
1) configure an interface and use our Web-based Voyager via a remote
browser
Nick Whitworth a écrit :
I have run rm /config/active and rebooted. During the setup, no interfaces
appear to be configurable. Any ideas? How can I view the logs you are talking
about?
You can configure your system in two ways:
1) configure an interface and use our Web-based Voyager via
1) remove everything in the config directory
2) reboot
3) at the boot manager, type space bar and rebuild your box with the IPSO that
you want. It is a much cleaner install, IMHO.
Paolo Riviello www.paoloriviello.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi,
this look like you have lost the specialfile to
Hi Andy,
did you do it? how it works?
Cheers
Paolo
From: André L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM
Subject: [FW-1] [SUSPECTED SPAM] Site to
I am equally happy to see li'l Sascha becoming Bigg now:-)!
On 2/15/07, Sascha Picchiantano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Rajeev, I got it all now, thanks to you :) Little Sascha is happy
now!
Cheers
Sascha
=
To set vacation,
Bhavin,
'Bad reply' fundamentally points to a misconfiguration as I stated in my
earlier message - if the message appears under any object, please check to
ensure it is configured correctly in SmartDashboard vs what is actually
installed/licensed on it.
So, you mean the object under which you
Hi,
This doesn't work, I deleted everything in the config directory. When I
run install I get the problem below:
Client IP address = 10.x.x.x/24
Server IP address = 10.x.x.x
Default gateway IP address = 10.x.x.x
Network Interface = , speed = , -duplex
Server download path = [./]
Package
Please IPSO 4.1 build 22. It will work for you.
Nick Whitworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,
This doesn't work, I deleted everything in the config directory. When I
run install I get the problem below:
Client IP address = 10.x.x.x/24
Server IP address = 10.x.x.x
Default gateway IP address =
it look like if you dont have any driver or specialfile to drive it...so
just follow
cisco4ng..
cheers
Paolo
From: cisco4ng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM
To:
I can't do this as the company policy is for all firewalls to be running
the same version of IPSO and CheckPoint. We have 20+ firewalls on NGX
R60 and IPSO 4.0 build 30.
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
cisco4ng
Nick Whitworth a écrit :
I can't do this as the company policy is for all firewalls to be running
the same version of IPSO and CheckPoint. We have 20+ firewalls on NGX
R60 and IPSO 4.0 build 30.
and all are the same hardware revision ?
all are flash based with the same flash revision ?
On 2/15/07, pkc_mls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
could anyone tell me (I suspect the answer is no ...) if it is possible
to set a vpn gateway
so the office mode clients could be able to cummunicate with each other ?
Yes this is possible.
Take a look at the vpn guide under vpn routing -
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Nick Whitworth wrote:
I can't do this as the company policy is for all firewalls to be running
the same version of IPSO and CheckPoint. We have 20+ firewalls on NGX
R60 and IPSO 4.0 build 30.
Lovely. So you options are:
1. Blindly follow the company policy and let you
Rajeev,
little Sascha came back to me and said wait, I have another question.
Can you ask Master Rajeec about it? ;) So here is this one more
little question:
If the enforcement module has one public IP address bound to the
external interface and they are using hide NAT to hide their
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Sascha Picchiantano wrote:
If the enforcement module has one public IP address bound to the external
interface and they are using hide NAT to hide their internal network behind
that IP, can they still use that very same IP for one static IP mapping
(obviously pointing to
The Big Sascha is becoming a Guru now:-)! Well, believe me I am no Master
but thanks any ways for your kindness, Sascha. Let us attempt to understand:
The external IP of the firewall can not be used for 'static, *one to one*
NAT (classically, it remains no more a 'one to one', right? - we need
23 matches
Mail list logo
