Paul Hanson wrote:
If you have a support contract with Check Point, they will make ISO's
available as needed. You should also be able to get this from your CSP.
Best regards,
Paul Hanson
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hi, all
Does anybody know how many concurrent Site-to-site VPN connections VPN-1 Edge
can maintain?
(Edge X16, X32, XU)?
Best regards,
Oleg mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away
sin a écrit :
sure it runs, just run it like this:
echo y | $FWDIR/upgrade_tools/upgrade_export fw1-`date +%d%m%Y`
there is even a -n option to avoid the echo y.
this option is described in checkpoint sk but upgrade_export -h doens't
mention it.
and inside $PWD you should get an archive
Hi Yuriko,
I don't know why, but after some test, I saw that:
- The pre-HW check, give the OK.
- SPLAT R62 doesn't recognise the Quad-NIC during the Setup: unknown
devices
After the system reboot (at the end of the setup procedure), ifconfig give
me the good output.
I chose/prefer new
Oleg Ivasenko wrote:
Hi, all
Does anybody know how many concurrent Site-to-site VPN connections VPN-1 Edge
can maintain?
(Edge X16, X32, XU)?
8,000 max. connections.
http://www.checkpoint.com/products/downloads/vpn-1_utm_edge_datasheet.pdf
Best regards,
Oleg
Hello,
-Is there a simple way to proceed some kind of clean roll-back from
(for example) secureplatform R60 HFA3 to R60.
rpm -e CPsuite-R60-00 ? does it remove only HFA03?
-During an upgrade to HFA03 on a R60 secureplatform, I would like to
check first, on the upgraded node, that applications
At 12:10 12.03.2007, you wrote:
Hello,
-Is there a simple way to proceed some kind of clean roll-back from
(for example) secureplatform R60 HFA3 to R60.
rpm -e CPsuite-R60-00 ? does it remove only HFA03?
no.
after the installation of any HFA it also creates an uninstall-script
for the HFA
pkc_mls wrote:
sin a écrit :
sure it runs, just run it like this:
echo y | $FWDIR/upgrade_tools/upgrade_export fw1-`date +%d%m%Y`
there is even a -n option to avoid the echo y.
this option is described in checkpoint sk but upgrade_export -h doens't
mention it.
never tried that. I looked
Confidentiality Notice:
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information belonging to the sender and is intended only for the use of the
party or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any
Hello Ray,
Thank you for your reply. This was very useful to me.
Rgds,
Thiago
Ray wrote:
Check out:
VPN-1 Power/UTM Release and HFA Version Comparison
Solution ID: #sk32083
Product: VPN-1 Pro (VPN-1/FW-1), Provider-1, SiteManager-1
Version: Last Modified: 28-Nov-2006
Ray
From:
Hello FW-1 list users.
I am glad to announce Check Point’s new Support web site
(www.checkpoint.com/support).
The new Support site includes an improved user interface and new features.
One of the new features is our Discussion Forums. Like the FW-1 list, the
forums are an environment where
Gil Sudai wrote:
For this reason and after several years of operation, the FW-1 mailing list
will be closed in the next days and its content will be placed in the
Miscellaneous forum.
Hi, If any of the subscribers of the mailing list is interested in
continuing using a fw-1 like list, I can
sin a écrit :
Gil Sudai wrote:
For this reason and after several years of operation, the FW-1
mailing list
will be closed in the next days and its content will be placed in the
Miscellaneous forum.
Hi, If any of the subscribers of the mailing list is interested in
continuing using a fw-1
The only thing I see is a Page cannot be displayed... And the new
checkpoint website is still -as always- vry slow when viewed from
europe
Things look bright :-S
David
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil
Gil,
can't the two operate side by side? Creating the forum is a good idea
but perhaps it doesn't have to come at the detriment of this list? I
don't have experience in forum development but surely it could be set up
that whilst a posting on the forum would remain on the forum, a posting
to this
Hi,
sorry, but 8,000 - it's not site-to-site VPN connections, it's not even VPN
connections
Oleg Ivasenko wrote:
Hi, all
Does anybody know how many concurrent Site-to-site VPN connections VPN-1
Edge can maintain?
(Edge X16, X32, XU)?
8,000 max. connections.
I did not catch the conversation... Are talking only about temporary
interruption of complete removal? So, what is the substitution list for
CheckPoint firewalls?
Best regards,
Roman M. Zeltser,
Sr. LAN/WAN Engineer
@National Computer Center
DPCP/DPCMB/DOCPM, RSIS
410-966-6192
Information
I agree with several of your guys...
Bring the forum up, it will for sure be useful, but I would very much rather
keeping a list to exchange info and issue resolutions.
If Gil and his buddies are just not able to keep both, they might have very
good reasons for that, I support sin on his
Agreed. I just tried to post and it doesn't seem to be working. I got
logged in but since I cannot successfully post I'll do it here!
My $.02 regarding decommissioning the mailing list:
It sure would be nice if these forums had RSS feeds. Without them, and
without the former mailing list, it
The fw1-gurus list also recently considered shutting down, but phoneboy
asked the list first before shutting down the list. Apparently there was a
large outcry from the list users and he decided to keep the list. It's too
bad Check Point couldn't extend use the same courtesy and give us the
hi,
I also prefer keeping the list. if the forum is more useful than the
list users will start using the forum and unsubscribe from the list ...
and then you can turn it off :-)
br
reinhard
At 15:17 12.03.2007, you wrote:
I agree with several of your guys...
Bring the forum up, it will for
Hi Roman,
Checkpoint announced that the FW1 List will be substituted by an forum and
that the old messages will be loaded into a miscelaneous section.
I think that an alternative fw1 list as proposed by Sin would be a good
idea if Checkpoint does not consider to maintain both options online,
On 3/12/07, Gil Sudai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello FW-1 list users.
I am glad to announce Check Point's new Support web site
(www.checkpoint.com/support).
The new Support site includes an improved user interface and new features.
One of the new features is our Discussion Forums.
I do
I think the new Forum and existing fw-1 mailinglist should run in
parallel at least for a couple of weeks to make sure it provides what
the current list provides today. If a majority agrees that the Forum
will handle all of the needs of the users, then the mailinglist could be
retired. If not,
please keep this list going
--
Paolo Riviello
Home: http://www.paoloriviello.com
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
E-mail msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: pao_rivi
If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament. -H-
... aspetto che il panico cresca, quando la paura si tramuta in visioni
I really hate forums compared to mailing list. It takes so much more time to go
through it than going though a mailing list.
I therefore hope that if CP decides to close down the FW-1 mailing list that
many of you join the fw1-gurus list.
-Torkel
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Mailing
I agree with the rest,
I also rather have a mailinglist.
if CP can't keep it up, at least implement RSS feed if necessary.
MK
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Gil Sudai
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 1:51 PM
To:
I second the RSS feed that would be great and I also like receiving the
feeds. If there is going to be a forum I hope we can continue receiving the
messages by email they are great to keep on top of new problems, and we can
easily do a search through them without having an Internet connection at
Hi Gil.
Thanks for the notification. The new site looks great. Well done!
I would like to point out however, that moving the list to the forum is
a bad idea. Here's why:
Most of the professionals on this list answer queries because it is
quick and convenient to do so via email. In general,
Hi ,
How can I get the list of all firewalls on CMA by command line interface ?
Thank you .
Eliezer .
=
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
I agree with keeping the mailing list
=
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=
To
Me too!
-GS
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mick
Reay
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 1:19 PM
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM
Subject: Re: [FW-1] FW-1 list is moving
I agree with keeping the mailing
I have already subscribed to the phoneboy's list.
Best regards,
Roman M. Zeltser,
Sr. LAN/WAN Engineer
@National Computer Center
DPCP/DPCMB/DOCPM, RSIS
410-966-6192
Information Security Index
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I too would like to see the list remain
=
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=
To
We had exactly the same issue w/ same R55P HFA08 on IP1260's and we did lot
of tweaking but what worked in our case ultimately was this:
Enable Monitor Firewall State: it was disabled in our case - so check it out
in your Voyager configs.
Also, do not need Coldstart delay - we removed the
In principle a great idea but the professionals here just don't h
Gil,
In principle a great idea but the professionals here just don't have the time
to login in to forum's to help people. Forums are good places to search for
answers like CPUG/Phoneboy's FAQ but not somewhere that you're going
Its a good idea to have a list as suggested by sin
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Anderson, Brian
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 8:27 PM
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM
Subject: Re: [FW-1]
I would strongly suggest you all to subscribe to the Phoneboy list if
not done so yet.
Don't put your effort in convincing Checkpoint to keep the list. Don't
think for a second that Checkpoint even cares if we would like the list
to be continued otherwise they would have asked before announcing
I Agree.
Please don't kill the list!
R.Lauriola.
Matthew Odendaal ha scritto:
Hi Gil.
Thanks for the notification. The new site looks great. Well done!
I would like to point out however, that moving the list to the forum is
a bad idea. Here's why:
Most of the professionals on this list
I agree with keeping the mailing list
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
=
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
40 matches
Mail list logo
