...@gmail.com
wrote:
From: Independent IT Consultant itsec.itcons...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [FW-1] NGX R65 or NGX R70 (70.1 and 70.2)
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM
Date: Saturday, January 23, 2010, 5:57 AM
They're great for small offices on relatively slow pipes. I don't use them
] NGX R65 or NGX R70 (70.1 and 70.2)
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM
Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 2:34 PM
Get a UTM Edge and be done with it.
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:fw-1-mailingl...@amadeus.us.checkpoint.com
Agreedwe have close to 200, easy to configure, manage and deploy...all
remote offices!
--- On Tue, 1/19/10, Diotte, Shannon S sdio...@entergy.com wrote:
From: Diotte, Shannon S sdio...@entergy.com
Subject: Re: [FW-1] NGX R65 or NGX R70 (70.1 and 70.2)
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 17:38, John Lindblom jlindb...@mico.com wrote:
How about the UTM-1 Appliances, are you using any of these? I'm
considering using one of these to replace R65 SLAT running on a HP rack
server.
What server configuration are you trying to replace ? Because UTM
devices do
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 18:53, John Lindblom jlindb...@mico.com wrote:
It a small DL140 NGX R65 Gateway with only 200 users behind it with a
single S2S VPN and a small handful of Remote VPN users. I think the UTM-1
572 would be a good replacement but the hardware support will definitely
be
Hi all,
I need to deploy a new security gateway on one of my remote offices and I doubt
about which version CP NGX version to install. At first instance I think to do it
with NGX R65. The most important reason is that I don't like anything at all
secureplatform OS (windows isn't an option),
, January 19, 2010 3:05:52 PM
Subject: [FW-1] NGX R65 or NGX R70 (70.1 and 70.2)
Hi all,
I need to deploy a new security gateway on one of my remote offices and I doubt
about which version CP NGX version to install. At first instance I think to do
it with NGX R65. The most important reason
Subject: Re: [FW-1] NGX R65 or NGX R70 (70.1 and 70.2)
IMO, secureplatform, sorry you don't like it, getting to the point where
you may not have a choice, already the case for many features. Why do
you dis-like splat?
From: carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com
To: FW-1
Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:fw-1-mailingl...@amadeus.us.checkpoint.com] On Behalf Of
carlopmart
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 10:06 PM
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM
Subject: [FW-1] NGX R65 or NGX R70 (70.1 and 70.2)
Hi all,
I need
Gary Scott wrote:
IMO, secureplatform, sorry you don't like it, getting to the point where you
may not have a choice, already the case for many features. Why do you dis-like
splat?
CPShell and console configuration's menu, mainly. There are very tedious,
uncomfortable and I lose control of
Alexey Baltacov wrote:
Hello,
I think you already have read the R70/.10/.20 release notes and already
know all new things are inside.
But I think you need be aware about following:
1: IPS @ R70 is really works good, same protections you have @ smart
defense and much more. It work faster and
Redhat isn't a supported enforcement point platform in r70, and RHEL3 is
rapidly approaching end of life. It won't support the latest platforms
(such as Nehalem). Move on.
If you really don't like splat, put an IP appliance out there. Run IPSO.
If you don't like cpshell, don't use it...
Get a UTM Edge and be done with it.
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:fw-1-mailingl...@amadeus.us.checkpoint.com] On Behalf Of
carlopmart
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 2:06 PM
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM
Subject: [FW-1] NGX R65
13 matches
Mail list logo
