Hi Gavin,
I spoke with Nabble, and they have just configured their system to make
our new mail lists browseable and searchable. Nabble also uses Lucene
for searching.
http://www.nabble.com/Zend-f16154.html
Most interestingly, they also provided an example of how these forums
could be
I disagree. Having a consistent style allows you to ignore the formatting
and concentrate on the content of the code itself. Differing coding styles
are unnecessarily distracting. I used to code in the BSD style, but now I
prefer OTB. Whenever I update old code, though, I revert back to the
Oh, of course. I completely missed that function.
I think all functions should begin with a verb, but isSet seems more
natural than isKey in this situation, since the array is a product of how
PHP handles POST data, not inherent in the HTML itself. For example, if you
were coming off of
Instead of duplicating 2 of the existing 3 links under the Quick Links
caption, I would suggest that the links do not look like links, which
makes the 3 easy, simple download links less obvious to the reader.
The organization of the download page as a whole is a bit strange to me.
I would
By all means, I support changing the release number 0.2 (doesn't justify,
however late it is to change it) to 0.5 (indicating roughly 50% coverage).
I think we would all support changing 0.2 to 0.5, especially in light of
the upcoming Zend conference.
-Matt
After Andi's announcement at the conference I changed my exam time to
Wednesday at 4pm from my original time of today at 4:30. Then I checked my
e-mail and saw it was on Wednesday, not today--argh! Luckily the ladies at
the registration booth are helpful and friendly and had no problem with
I consider this a bug in PHP itself, personally. The solution is changing
__get to something more like this:
// Zend_View_Abstract::__get()
public function __get($key)
{
if ($key[0] != '_') {
if (!isset($this-_vars[$key])) {
$this-_vars[$key] = null;
}
return
Prompted by Gavin, I just submitted about 13 issues to JIRA. Eleven of
those are coding standard issues to JIRA that I found as I glanced through
0.2 while waiting for my plane in San Jose. These are all trivial, so about
half of them are just suggestions.
I also ran across the fact that
1) Too many top level components.
Why are components like Zend_TimeSync and Zend_Measure being given top
level
categories? Everything else so far seems to be categorized correctly, but
why are those two not under the Zend_Locale namespace?
Zend_Measure deserves its own top-level category.
As long as you don't do it for addAttachment() I think it's a good idea,
since there's no easy way to get at the attachment without a return value
(to set the filename, content type, etc.).
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: Nico Edtinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Waldemar Schott [EMAIL
I've played around with Zend_Cache and I found out that Zend_Cache only
supports some kind of 'general lifetime'.
In real enviroments there is a need for cache-record based ttl's. E.g.
we're caching some database queries that almost never need to be updated
( so I would set TTL to e.g. 24
Ah, ignore my last e-mail. ;-)
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: Ralph Schindler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Zend Framework fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Zend Session issues
we recently added a
I'm subscribed to just about every list, but it seems that more often than
not messages that are sent to a specific topic list (most recently, fw-mvc
and fw-webservices) are just CCed to fw-general anyway. This results in me
getting lots of duplicate e-mails, and seems to defeat the point of
important to publicize the differences well.
Regards,
Bill Karwin
Matthew Ratzloff wrote:
I'm subscribed to just about every list, but it seems that more often
than not messages that are sent to a specific topic list (most
recently, fw-mvc and fw-webservices) are just CCed to fw-general
anyway
RewriteRule !\.(js|ico|gif|jpg|png|css)$ /index.php
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: Troy L. Marker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 6:55 PM
Subject: [fw-general] Wierd Routing
Greetins,
I have spend the better part of a week trying to
as your suggested.
It,
however, did not help.
Would you happen to have another suggestion?
Regards,
Troy Marker
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Ratzloff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 9:13 PM
To: Zend Framework
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Wierd Routing
Hi Ralph,
It depends on what sort of information you're capturing for each member
type (students, professors, etc.). Assuming the two do not have much
overlap, and going on just the information you provided, I might do the
following:
Domain
---
These classes handle things
Ralph,
What if I wanted to limit the ability to Creating/Updating/Deleting to a
certain group of people (Access Control / admin type) and I wanted
funnel this through a super-controller. Is that possible, is this a
correct method? For example:
I want to disallow direct controllers like
For those interested in such things, I've completely revised the
Zend_Scheduler proposal to take into account all comments received to
date. I welcome any and all additional feedback.
Briefly (and a bit densely), Zend_Scheduler is a request-based job
scheduling component designed to allow easy
In other words it will need to be a warning. That is where I feel
that init() is unintuitive and most people (I say with hesitation
being a self elected representative) would expect to go with the
constructor for this task.
Why not declare Zend_Controller_Action::__construct() as final?
Try implementing Zend_View_Interface instead.
Hope that helps,
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: David Koblas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Zend Framework fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 10:15 AM
Subject: [fw-general] private/procted in classes
I'm working on
Joe,
My point is incompatibility between Zend products.
If you build serious, enterprise-level project, you probably will use
Zend Guard. I am not being elitist, but it seems like Zend framework
is not used for projects that are encoded with Zend Guard? Because
nobody raised the issue
http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDOC/Zend_Acl
Hope that helps,
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: Superbiji [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Zend Framework General fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 7:59 PM
Subject: [fw-general] Zend_Acl example
hi all,
i would
A component written in PHP would be incredibly slow compared to the
compiled-in extension written in C. The current PHP DOM functionality is
very fast and not difficult to extend to accomodate matters of taste.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: Емил Иванов [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I don't know, I think all of these are answers in search of a problem
that's already been satisfactorily resolved with Zend::exception().
To be honest, I also don't understand what the problem is in the e-mail
that touched off this subject. Exceptions are thrown inside of Zend[_*]
classes so
Was it an oversight that Zend_Registry lost its set() and has() methods
when it was refactored to extend ArrayObject, despite still having a
corresponding get() method? I don't know about everyone else, but I
prefer to pass around a registry object explicitly rather than rely on the
static
I occasionally see people on message boards, in blog comments, and
(although not lately) on this mailing list asking why Zend Framework
doesn't have an Ajax component, so I've written up a quick blog post with
my thoughts on the subject. Thought I'd share with any who were
interested.
offset* are the names used for overloading OO syntax. So $obj-prop,
$obj-prop = 5 and isset($obj-prop) should all work nicely.
Don't you prefer that syntax?
Oh, well that makes more sense. Call my predilection to set and get
poisoning from Java. ;-)
Looks like these pages should be updated
There is a really long line in the docs at http://framework.zend.com/
wiki/display/ZFDOC/Global+Session+Management. I think it's the
myapp.ini bit. It's making it a pain to read.
Fixed.
-Matt
There's no merge function. This will work, however:
$config = new Zend_Config($subordinate-asArray() + $master-asArray());
This will allow master values to be redefined in the subordinate. If you
want to prevent that, swap the order.
It would be kind of neat if you could do something like
This is fine, except you will occasionally get situations like this:
* @param Zend_Controller_Router_Route_Interface $param2 OPTIONAL Description
goes here (default: false)
* @param array $flags An array of flags.
Lining those up is unwieldy. I generally line up the second word
(everything
At Ralph's prompting, I have created a poll to determine what the
community consensus is on merging Zend_Session_Core into Zend_Session.
The following link contains a brief discussion on the pros and cons of
such a decision. Please go here to vote:
I don't know that Zend_Search_Lucene should stray too far from the
guidelines set out by Apache Lucene. It is, after all, a PHP implementation
of Apache Lucene.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: Steph Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alexander Veremyev [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Since the Lucene search is Zend_Search_Lucene and not Zend_Search itself,
I've been wondering if we'll see additional search implementations after
1.0, and what those might be. Is Lucene sufficient for most people, or are
there other options out there that people would like to see?
Just
Hi Mike,
If you're pulling dates from MySQL, why not use DATE_FORMAT()?
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/date-and-time-functions.html#function-date-format
Hope that helps,
-Matt
I've been trying to use zend_date to rearrange mysql dates and am having
problems.
when i try the
I understand your point, but I'm not sure how this discussion relates to
Zend Framework. Perhaps it's better to direct this question to
php-general@lists.php.net instead.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: Jan Pieper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Thursday,
I believe he uses this method to shorten the class name.
Zend_Pdf_Resource_Image_Jpeg = Zend_Pdf_Image_Jpeg
I would argue in favor of convention over a few less keystrokes. It's a
longer name, but that's one of the downsides of using a language that has no
namespace support. :-)
import
I think Andrew meant to send this to the list:
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Bidochko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Matthew Ratzloff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Consistency in naming
Zend_Validator indeed!
We already used the same
I was looking for the documentation on Zend_Console_Getopt (now in core) and
I couldn't find it in the ZFDEV area of the wiki, either core or incubator.
It's supposed to update hourly, but the documentation isn't there--just the
XML committed a few days ago. Help?
-Matt
Zend_Mime_Decode = Zend_Mime_Decoder
Decoder sounds like a Schwarzenegger action movie. It's also more of
an internal class. But if everyone's happy with that name I'll change
it.
:-D Anyway, it lines up with Zend_Json_Decoder.
-Matt
I guess this is primarily a question for Bill. Will the post-1.0 release
schedule match the pace of the pre-1.0 release schedule? Meaning, once
1.0 is released, will we see 1.1 about a month later? And 1.2 about a
month after that?
Just curious,
-Matt
Ralf,
I cannot agree with you and Ralph more.
Drop Zend.php altogether. Finalize Zend_Registry and move to the core.
Create Zend/Debug.php and Zend/Loader.php by moving the corresponding
methods into them, and keep those methods static. Let Zend_Environment
handle version checking--that's
Based on the code, Zend_Mime is strictly limited to mail-related
functionality. A quick grep also shows that it is only used in Zend_Mail
and Zend_Mail_Part. Why is this a top-level component?
When I think of Zend_Mime, I think of Mime Magic functionality: parsing a
magic file to determine the
Oh, gotcha. Thanks for the explanation--I see your point.
-Matt
Sure MIME is mostly used in mail, because that's the most used
messaging system. But it's not limited to mail and could be used in
other protocols. Also Zend_Mail_Message and Zend_Mail_Part should be
based on it, but that's an
For what it's worth, it is ideal to retain the Zend.php instead of
splitting it up so the framework could build more utility functions into
it in future - that does not fit anywhere. How about renaming it to
Zend_Util, instead?
I can't imagine any utility methods that would be needed that
Here are a few more examples of renaming the top-level class/sub-class
names:
Zend_Acl_Role = Zend_Acl_Role_Role
Zend_Acl_Resource = Zend_Acl_Resource_Resource
Zend_Cache = Zend_Cache_Cache
Zend_Cache_Backend = Zend_Cache_Cache_Backend_Backend
Zend_Db
Andi,
I am glad you and Bill are considering alternate solutions, but I honestly
find the multiple classes in one file method to be more confusing than
the current state of affairs. Premature optimization.
We still believe having all the core functionality in one file is
beneficial. While we
suppose, but I think it's fine as
is.
So anyway, for the most part, the names are good. There are just a handful
that would have to change to create a naming standard.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ralph Schindler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Matthew
Olivier,
Take a look at the wiki:
http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFUSER/Zend+Framework+Web+Hosts
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: Olivier Revollat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 9:47 AM
Subject: [fw-general] Hosting ??
I try to
Zend_Json works without the JSON extension.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: Jason Qi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Zend Framework fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Hosting ??
You have to make sure if it supports what you want.
i.g.
I guess I don't care whether this feature is included or not (doesn't seem
to hurt anything, but the benefit appears minimal), but what's preventing
you from doing the following?
/tags/zend,framework,whatever,other,tags,you,want
$tags = $this-getRequest()-get('tags');
$tags = explode(',',
subclassing.
The way I look at it you don't have to extend Zend_Registry to use
multiple instances. All it says is that if you want the ZF to use your
own registry you can tell it to do so.
On 3/7/07, Matthew Ratzloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bill,
I've updated the proposal page
to get yourself confused. :-)
Regards,
Bill Karwin
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Ratzloff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:30 AM
To: Zend Framework
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Zend.php proposal
It's the same difference. Either way, a custom registry
I really don't think [the proposed Zend_Log::debug() method]
is a good replacement for Zend::dump.
I agree. However, I think having a method for dumping objects to a log is
good to have in tandem with the existing, simple dump() function. Both
would preferably be made available through a
It's not just Davey's proposal; all proposals must go through the formal
proposal process. Especially something like Active Record. Rushing
something like that in time for 0.9, or even 1.0, would be a disaster.
Also, once Zend_Db_Table is ironed out, a Zend_Db_ActiveRecord class could
probably
but this should not be the only way. What I mean is:
static public function put($key, $value) {
$me = self::getInstance();
$me[$key] = $value;
}
That sounds fine to me. As long as it's not called register() and
registry()!
I have updated the proposal page. But it has to work
All issues raised are addressed, except Zend::registry() vs.
Zend_Registry::getInstance().
What if Zend_Registry::getRegistry() was an alias of
Zend_Registry::getInstance()?
Then the user doesn't need to know or understand the connotations of
getInstance().
Perhaps we can also provide
We really need to finish this discussion in order to have enough time to
implement the changes before the code-freeze. I think we're virtually
finished.
To summarize:
[...]
Looks good to me.
-Matt
Hi everyone,
I've posted a new proposal, Zend_Mime_Magic. It's a native PHP
implementation of the standard Mime Magic functionality. For those
unfamiliar with it, Mime Magic is an umbrella term that describes programs
that use byte comparison to (attempt to) identify files by their content.
All files in trunk are shown as deleted, and reference DbTable-09.
-Matt
the
branch after confirming that the changes were merged to the trunk.
Sometimes FishEye also seems to take a lunch break once in a while as it
updates revision data from svn. So if you have troubles, try again in
20 minutes or so.
Regards,
Bill Karwin
-Original Message-
From: Matthew
Hi Mark,
This would be a nice idea for a generalized component that would apply to
all classes, but unfortunately you can't do it.
For example, this doesn't work:
$object = new Zend_Delegate::getClassName('Zend_Example');
It has to be in two steps:
$class =
In that case, you might as well make it a true factory and just have:
return Zend_Delegate::factory('Zend_Controller_Request_Http', $parameters);
which queries Zend_Delegate for any user-specified delegates and
instantiates them.
Defining delegates would be specified like this:
object - really should note the
distinction in the manual because it should be avoided if that's the case.
Or maybe I should read the manual more often in case it already is!
Pádraic Brady
http://blog.astrumfutura.com
http://www.patternsforphp.com
- Original Message
From: Matthew
Hi Stephan,
I'm not sure I understand your question.
Form actions would just be URLs like any other in your application. Say a
user is at the application index, and logs in. A form action of
'/user/login' would send form results to UserController::loginAction().
loginAction() would then parse
I think I understand the gist of what you're getting at now.
a) Use Ajax to asynchronously process things like subscribing and logging
in, using a small JSON or XML token that reports either success (with
relevant data like success message, first name, user ID, etc.) or failure
(with any error
, March 25, 2007 7:31 AM
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Zend_Filter_Input...
Matthew Ratzloff wrote:
Well, my point was that because any of those can be manipulated
(POST, GET, COOKIE, etc.), selecting from a specific source can
lead to a false sense of added security.
The idea that ignorance promotes
On Thu, March 29, 2007 11:57 am, Rob Allen wrote:
My initial instinct that this would add too much complexity to and
exceed the responsibily of Zend_Config_Ini which has a one-to-one
relationship with an ini file.
The obvious solutions are to use some userland code to load each one
On Fri, March 30, 2007 4:07 am, Rob Allen wrote:
Matthew Ratzloff wrote:
A better solution would be to rename Zend_Config to Zend_Config_Array,
which is a better description of what it does. Then make Zend_Config a
top-level configuration loading class that auto-detects the appropriate
related
operations like: create, remove, rename, move, copy or find directories
and files. Basically, what we can already do, but in an object-oriented
manner. In addition to this, I have been also thinking about a
something
like a recycle bin.
Regards,
Ivan.
Matthew Ratzloff schrieb
http://www.patternsforphp.com
- Original Message
From: Matthew Ratzloff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Kevin McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 11:39:13 PM
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Zend_File_Parser, Zend_String, etc
On Tue, April 10, 2007 7:12 am, Ivan Shumkov wrote:
I'm think about integration FirePHP (http://firephp.org) in to Zend
Framework:
1. Use Our_FirePHP for implementation protocol (I didn't like default PEAR
class)
2. Use Zend_Log_Writer_FirePhp for writing log
3. Use
Shahar,
I think it is up to your discretion. As you said, there are no clear
answers in the documentation.
In reality, there should probably be some kind of objective policy based on
dependency. Maybe when the parent classes are required (e.g.,
require_once) in order for the class to
Good luck in all your future endeavors, Gavin. I hope you will continue
to work on Zend Framework as your free time allows. :-)
-Matt
On Wed, April 18, 2007 3:05 pm, Bill Karwin wrote:
We would like to thank Gavin Vess for his enthusiasm and contributions
to the Zend Framework over the past
Seems like there is a lot of negative phrasing in the front controller
parameters (or: not a lot of non-negative phrasing). Wouldn't it be better
if they were framed as positives with default true values instead?
Something like:
$front-setParam('bufferOutput', false);
I've actually done this already, but I haven't written up a proposal because
a) I have several proposals posted as it is, b) I've been busy with a new
job and a house hunt, and c) new proposals aren't being accepted at the
moment anyway. But at least one of my proposals depends on this
Ralph, you're one step ahead of me. But instead of broad dissertations on
the role of Controllers, Views, and Models, what I'd like to see is
concrete end-user code showing how each would work. Not just controllers,
but sample views as well. Establish a use case and then show how each
solution
Hi Christer,
Looks interesting. Note that it would be Zend_BitTorrent, with a capital T.
You might also try to split up the
Zend_BitTorrent_Torrent::buildFromPath() method into a couple other
methods, because it's pretty long at the moment.
-Matt
On Thu, December 6, 2007 1:21 am, Christer
Hi Wil,
Re: e-mail lists. When the separate mailing lists were started, the lists
were much more lively (in the range of about 50 e-mails a day, sometimes
upwards of 100, if I recall correctly). At present the lists aren't as
active, but I imagine once adoption picks up the traffic rate will
. It used to have
a wiki-like editing capability that now seems to have been sensibly
removed after people edited it accidentally. I'm not sure what the
process is now as I've not had to touch it for ages.
I'm cc'ing this to Matthew Ratzloff as he was another volunteer who
may be better informed than
Hi Thomas,
I responded to the proposal, but my main point is that this class isn't
actually uploading anything, and it's not protocol-dependent (as far as I
can tell). It's handling uploaded files. Therefore you solve these
problems by naming it Zend_File_UploadHandler.
-Matt
On Tue, December
/wiki/display/ZFPROP/Zend_Paginator+-+Matthew+Ratzloff
Thanks!
-Matt
I'd be interested in something like this.
-Matt
On Wed, December 26, 2007 2:15 pm, Federico Cargnelutti wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know if there are any plans to add new functionality to the
Zend_Debug class? IMO this class has a lot more to offer.
I always found inspirations in the eZ
On Fri, December 28, 2007 2:08 pm, Federico Cargnelutti wrote:
But, who is using the web services components included in the ZF? I know
that in terms of image, to associate the ZF with web services is a good
thing, but, the discussions I'm having with Technical Managers and other
Developers
Congrats, Ralph!
-Matt
On Mon, January 21, 2008 9:42 am, Wil Sinclair wrote:
I couldn't be happier to announce that as of this morning, Ralph
Schindler has joined the Zend team to work on ZF full time! Congrats,
Ralph! Now get back to work. :)
,Wil
For awhile MagickWand for PHP was the best option available, but then the
IMagick extension was resurrected after years of inactivity and got an
object-oriented interface. IMagick is the way to go now.
-Matt
On Fri, January 25, 2008 5:23 am, £ukasz Wojciechowski wrote:
Since there is no class
Christer,
I'm actually in the process of finishing up just such a component for my
job. (Can't share it, unfortunately--it contains some proprietary
knowledge.)
Some thoughts:
- Call it Zend_Device.
- Identifying specific mobile devices is more important than identifying
specific standard
Am I doing something wrong? Nothing is enabled in the configuration.
This is just the core components.
-Matt
--
local:library matt$ phpunit AllTests.php
PHPUnit 3.2.14 by Sebastian Bergmann.
..S. 60 / 5152
On Tue, February 19, 2008 1:12 pm, Thomas Weidner wrote:
Hy Matt,
It's easier for all and you if you are using the --verbose options from
phpunit.
This generates more output and show you in which testbed errors/failures
occur.
Also your testbed does not run through... I am missing the
when I
can put code into the HTML.
any suggestions?
A simple stopwatch implementation is available here:
http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/Zend_Stopwatch+-+Matthew+Ratzloff
Simple usage:
// At top of bootstrap
$stopwatch = new Zend_Stopwatch();
$stopwatch-start();
// Later
I am repeatedly encountering a bug while trying to file a bug with
Zend_Db_Statement.
HTTP Status 404 - No view for result [error] exists for action
[ViewIssue]
This is annoying.
When someone from Zend fixes this, could you create the issue? It's
minor, but it's something that should be
Why don't you put it under the library directory?
library/
Ns/
Zend/
Problem solved...
-Matt
On Fri, April 18, 2008 4:35 am, Giorgio Sironi wrote:
Hello everyone, I am subclassing Zend_Loader to allow my module
classes to reside in a subdirectory of application/modules/module_name
I'd suggest Zend_Soap, but it seems like it will never leave the incubator.
http://framework.zend.com/svn/framework/trunk/incubator/library/Zend/Soap/
Needs more testing, apparently.
We recently did a big SOAP single sign-on project here for one of our
clients, and we ended up just using
Ben has renamed the proposal Zend_Console_Process in response to community
feedback.
http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/Zend_Console_Process+-+Ben+Scholzen
-Matt
On Sat, April 26, 2008 2:30 pm, Marcus Bointon wrote:
It is - I've been using it for years in some daemons, and it works
http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.controller.actionhelpers.html#zend.controller.actionhelpers.contextswitch
-Matt
On Sat, May 3, 2008 1:30 pm, draketherake wrote:
I want to have a regular version of my website and an iphone version at a
subdomain of iphone.domain.com. However, I don't
Hi Robert,
I'm not sure how this relates to Zend Framework; it seems more appropriate
for the VDaemon forum. Maybe I'm missing something?
My thoughts: I've never been a fan of Smarty (especially after working
with it regularly...) and Zend_Form is awesome. Does that help? ;-)
-Matt
On Wed,
I agree; a link in the code is a good compromise.
Beyond that, this is a training issue if this is truly relevant to your
company, Federico. Otherwise, you can create a deployment script that
removes these components.
-Matt
On Fri, May 9, 2008 8:23 am, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
Let's be
Or have one installation, rewrite all URLs to index.php, and extend your
own router and route (I believe) from Zend_Controller_Router_Rewrite and
Zend_Controller_Router_Route. That would be the cleanest way.
-Matt
On Fri, May 9, 2008 2:16 am, Cristian Bichis wrote:
Try to symlink each folder
, Martel.
-Matt
On Fri, May 9, 2008 11:43 am, MichaÅ Minicki wrote:
Matthew Ratzloff wrote:
Or have one installation, rewrite all URLs to index.php, and extend your
own router and route (I believe) from Zend_Controller_Router_Rewrite and
Zend_Controller_Router_Route. That would
Although I was (like you) under the impression that opcode caches couldn't
cache autoloaded classes, I'm more inclined to trust Matthew and Ralph
than a blog post from last December that doesn't have the test suite
available for download. Five months is a long time in Zend Framework
time; since
1 - 100 of 272 matches
Mail list logo
