Given the same obsolete hardware (and the XPostFacto software add-on):
-- Is 10.2 faster or slower than 10.3?
Faster, but less stable.
-- Is 10.3 faster or slower than 10.4?
A lot faster, given the low RAM ceiling of the WS and WSII.
-- Is 10.2 faster or slower than 10.4?
Is a
On 26 Feb 2006, at 15:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Is 10.2 faster or slower than 10.4?
Is a cheetah faster than a tortoise? However, Jag is much less
stable than Tiger. The best compromise, IMHO, is Panther with
XPostFacto.
Caleb
Having used both OS's on a WS I and a WS II, I
Having used both OS's on a WS I and a WS II, I have to agree.
Panther corrected a number of issues both Wallstreets I used had with Jaguar.
To be completely honest, I was basing my recommendation on my
lackluster experience with Jag on my Lombard, and the insane
stability of Panther on both a
