On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 16:54, Michael Hanselmann han...@google.com wrote:
From: René Nussbaumer r...@google.com
This is preparation for the mock system, where we need the same cURL
mock.
Signed-off-by: René Nussbaumer r...@google.com
Signed-off-by: Michael Hanselmann han...@google.com
---
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 16:54, Michael Hanselmann han...@google.com wrote:
With this patch headers are constructed from the PycURL options
and passed to the mock implementation.
---
lib/rapi/testutils.py | 27 ++-
test/ganeti.rapi.client_unittest.py |
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 16:54, Michael Hanselmann han...@google.com wrote:
This patch adds a mock RAPI client to test input values to methods. All
methods either raise an exception if there was a problem or return None.
Third-party code can use this to test their input values to the RAPI
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:20:59pm +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
I see a few ways…
Would it make sense to submit this to the author of bitarray?
Yes.
Any comments are more than welcome.
So. First, the author of bitarray should be the one commenting on the
code, especially the C
[resending with proper Cc:, sorry for spamming you]
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:20:59pm +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
I see a few ways…
Would it make sense to submit this to the author of bitarray?
Yes.
Any comments are more than welcome.
So. First, the author of bitarray should be the one
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 06:06:49PM +0300, Vangelis Koukis wrote:
[resending with proper Cc:, sorry for spamming you]
(heh, no worry!)
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:20:59pm +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
I see a few ways…
Would it make sense to submit this to the author of bitarray?
Yes.
Update the shared storage design document to reflect the current
changes, after the implementation of the ExtStorage interface.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
doc/design-shared-storage.rst | 204 ++--
1 files changed, 112
Hello team,
Until now, Ganeti can handle shared storage in two ways:
- with the `drbd' disk template (internally)
- with the `blockdev' and `sharedfile' template (externally)
As stated in the shared-storage design doc, the blockdev and sharedfile
template cannot handle operations on the
* ganeti-extstorage-interface man page
* gnt-storage man page
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
.gitignore |1 +
Makefile.am |2 +
man/footer.rst | 11 +-
With this commit we introduce the External Storage Interface
to Ganeti, abbreviated: ExtStorage Interface.
The ExtStorage Interface provides Ganeti with the ability to interact
with externally connected shared storage pools, visible by all
VM-capable nodes. This means that Ganeti is able to
Add support for passing parameters to the ext template (ext-params).
Take advantage of disk-params, that don't seem to make much sense in
this template (ExtStorage Providers are not predefined and we don't
know their needs) and use them to pass the ext-params dynamically to
the template.
Add a new client called 'gnt-storage'.
The client interacts with the ExtStorage interface, similarly to
the way gnt-os interacts with the OS interface.
For now, only two commands are supported: 'info' and 'diagnose'.
'diagnose' calculates the node status of each provider on each node,
similarly
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 07:28:25PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hello team,
Until now, Ganeti can handle shared storage in two ways:
- with the `drbd' disk template (internally)
- with the `blockdev' and `sharedfile' template (externally)
As stated in the shared-storage
On 04/04/2012 07:39 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 07:28:25PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hello team,
Until now, Ganeti can handle shared storage in two ways:
- with the `drbd' disk template (internally)
- with the `blockdev' and `sharedfile' template
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 09:27:35PM +0300, Dimitris Aragiorgis wrote:
Commit 3b3b1bc does not entirely fix the bug introduced in commit
f396ad8. It fixes consistency of config data in permanent storage, but
does not ensure consistency in data held in runtime memory of masterd.
The bug of
Comment #1 on issue 190 by zo...@gentoo.org: gnt-cluster verify fails on
missing drbd module even if the cluster does not use drbd
http://code.google.com/p/ganeti/issues/detail?id=190
Have the same problem
Wed Apr 4 20:52:59 2012 - ERROR: node node1amd.xxx.xx: cannot parse drbd
status
16 matches
Mail list logo
