Re: [Ganglia-developers] Gmetad bottlenecks

2013-12-07 Thread Devon H. O'Dell
2013/12/7 Adrian Sevcenco adrian.sevce...@cern.ch: On 12/06/2013 10:51 PM, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: 2013/12/6 Vladimir Vuksan vli...@veus.hr: Hello everyone, Hi! For few weeks now we have had performance issues due to growth of our monitoring setup. One of my colleagues Devon O'Dell

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Gmetad bottlenecks

2013-12-07 Thread Chris Burroughs
Thank you Devon and Vladimir for starting this thread. We (AddThis) have been struggling with gmetad performance and stability for a while and I'm personally excited to see the focus here. I'll explain briefly how we are using ganglia for context and then have inline comments. We have two

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Gmetad bottlenecks

2013-12-07 Thread Vladimir Vuksan
On 12/07/2013 02:23 PM, Chris Burroughs wrote: On 12/06/2013 03:36 PM, Vladimir Vuksan wrote: The Ganglia core is comprised of two daemons, `gmond` and `gmetad`. `Gmond` is primarily responsible for sending and receiving metrics; `gmetad` carries the hefty task of summarizing / aggregating

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Gmetad bottlenecks

2013-12-07 Thread Nikhil
Thank you Vladimir and Devon. Much appreciated. +2 for these below initiatives. * changing the data serialization format from XML to one that is easier / faster to parse, * using a different data structure than a hash table for metrics hierarchies (probably a tree with metrics stored at each

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Gmetad bottlenecks

2013-12-07 Thread Devon H. O'Dell
2013/12/7 Chris Burroughs chris.burrou...@gmail.com: Thank you Devon and Vladimir for starting this thread. We (AddThis) have been struggling with gmetad performance and stability for a while and I'm personally excited to see the focus here. I'll explain briefly how we are using ganglia for