Hi Devon,
I think now that we the ability to define exactly which metrics should and
should not be summarised then the issue of slow-downs due to metric
summarisation can be managed.
If we are to look at redoing the XML parsing next then the two contenders
that come to mind are gzipped JSON and
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Nicholas Satterly nfsatte...@gmail.com wrote:
If we are to look at redoing the XML parsing next then the two contenders
that come to mind are gzipped JSON and Google Protocol Buffers.
PB is meant to be very efficient and therefore faster, however it seems
On 01/15/2014 06:42 AM, Jesse Becker wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Nicholas Satterly nfsatte...@gmail.com
wrote:
If we are to look at redoing the XML parsing next then the two contenders
that come to mind are gzipped JSON and Google Protocol Buffers.
PB is meant to be very
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Dave Rawks d...@pandora.com wrote:
On 01/15/2014 06:42 AM, Jesse Becker wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Nicholas Satterly nfsatte...@gmail.com
wrote:
If we are to look at redoing the XML parsing next then the two
contenders
that come to mind are
Perhaps configurable, then? XDR is a pain in the ass to debug. I was
considering going with JSON or BSON initially.
--dho
2014/1/15 Dave Rawks d...@pandora.com:
On 01/15/2014 06:42 AM, Jesse Becker wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Nicholas Satterly nfsatte...@gmail.com
wrote:
If we
