On 7/4/2008 at 12:58 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 10:42:06AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
-1
I agree with Brad on this.
Not sure what to make of no one replying to the code on this thread, after
all this is a
On 7/7/2008 at 2:37 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo Marcelo
Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 12:31:13PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 7/4/2008 at 12:58 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03,
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 10:42:06AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
-1
I agree with Brad on this.
Not sure what to make of no one replying to the code on this thread, after
all this is a developer mailing list and I would expect all debate to be
made in a technical basis.
So C++ support is
On 7/2/2008 at 5:22 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following proposed patch for stable 3.1, removes all references to C/C++
as a supported language for building DSO metrics as it was meaningless and
only relevant when used with
-1
I agree with Brad on this.
So C++ support is incomplete, we should document this and keep going.
Regards,
Bernard
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/2/2008 at 5:22 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED]