Re: [Ganglia-developers] ganglia-web package at risk

2014-03-03 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 04/02/14 14:56, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 04/02/14 14:47, Chris Burroughs wrote: I thought the distro anti-bundling stance was paired with a we already have X so you should just depend on it. I'm not sure how this works with javascript. Is there some debian jquery package that could be

Re: [Ganglia-developers] ganglia-web package at risk

2014-03-03 Thread Vladimir Vuksan
That would be fine with me if that is what it takes. Include the full blown Jquery UI. Thanks, Vladimir On 03/03/2014 01:25 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 04/02/14 14:56, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 04/02/14 14:47, Chris Burroughs wrote: I thought the distro anti-bundling stance was paired with

Re: [Ganglia-developers] ganglia-web package at risk

2014-03-03 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 03/03/14 21:08, Vladimir Vuksan wrote: That would be fine with me if that is what it takes. Include the full blown Jquery UI. I see there is 1.10.2 right now Can I just swap from the custom.min.js file to the full min.js file? Or do you want to try the latest, 1.10.4, before releasing

Re: [Ganglia-developers] ganglia-web package at risk

2014-03-03 Thread Vladimir Vuksan
Let's stick with 1.10.2. Vladimir On 03/03/2014 03:13 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 03/03/14 21:08, Vladimir Vuksan wrote: That would be fine with me if that is what it takes. Include the full blown Jquery UI. I see there is 1.10.2 right now Can I just swap from the custom.min.js file to

Re: [Ganglia-developers] ganglia-web package at risk

2014-03-03 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 03/03/14 21:27, Vladimir Vuksan wrote: Let's stick with 1.10.2. Done Sources are in a directory called contrib now, it is copied into the ganglia-web dist tarball too -- Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off

Re: [Ganglia-developers] ganglia-web package at risk

2014-02-04 Thread Chris Burroughs
I thought the distro anti-bundling stance was paired with a we already have X so you should just depend on it. I'm not sure how this works with javascript. Is there some debian jquery package that could be depended on? On 01/31/2014 04:23 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: Debian is proposing to

Re: [Ganglia-developers] ganglia-web package at risk

2014-02-04 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 04/02/14 14:47, Chris Burroughs wrote: I thought the distro anti-bundling stance was paired with a we already have X so you should just depend on it. I'm not sure how this works with javascript. Is there some debian jquery package that could be depended on? There is a jQuery package in

Re: [Ganglia-developers] ganglia-web package at risk

2014-01-31 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 31/01/14 16:01, Vladimir Vuksan wrote: I would go with option a). I am fine with this approach. OK, I'll sort it out over the next few days Another thing to consider is to have the packager download problematic JS files and download them directly of jquery.com. Daniel can that be done ?

Re: [Ganglia-developers] ganglia-web package at risk

2014-01-31 Thread Vladimir Vuksan
What I was suggesting is to add dynamic download automatically. Can't bootstrap pull external files ? On 01/31/2014 10:06 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: Another thing to consider is to have the packager download problematic JS files and download them directly of jquery.com. Daniel can that be done

Re: [Ganglia-developers] ganglia-web package at risk

2014-01-31 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 31/01/14 16:10, Vladimir Vuksan wrote: What I was suggesting is to add dynamic download automatically. Can't bootstrap pull external files ? That depends If you want to run a bootstrap script that creates a release tarball and uploads it to some download page, then the script can pull