On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 02:41:29PM +0100, Kostas Georgiou wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:38:15AM -0500, Martin Hicks wrote:
The common practice in the rpm world is to not to use the soname for the
latest version and have something like compat-ganglia-30 or libganglia30
for example for the
Hi Brad:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed, we should have an official name however since the release version
number is the only required information for tracking purposes, a release name
is not important.
I originally asked Carlo to come up
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 02:14:15PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fair, and so for the sake of clarity let me explain again
what are the specification constrains :
* must allow for nodes to specify where the configuration server is
* must allow for additional configurations to be
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 02:05:41PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been giving this some more thought. There are a
couple of issues
that come to mind:
- The default configuration might not always be appropriate - would
people welcome a patch that disables this behaviour
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 02:12:34PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Martin Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think its necessary (or good form) to include a full version
number in the RPM package name. RPM already does versioning based on
%version.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 05:26:47PM -0400, Jason A. Smith wrote:
There are two basic ways to navigate around the ganglia website, one way
is via explicit A HREF=URL links.
this is the one I'd test and which is currently inconsistent leading to
some parameters getting lost while going back and
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:16:53AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
Hi Brad:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed, we should have an official name however since the release version
number is the only required information for tracking purposes, a
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 09:15:00AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my proposal:
- insert a dynamic_configuration step immediately after parsing the
text files and before any of the cfg_t structures are examined
how would this work for module configurations which could in
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:09 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:16:53AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
Hi Brad:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed, we should have an
Greetings,
So it is finally here, the release date for testing of ganglia 3.1.1 and to
keep up with traditions, everyone that can do an official package is
unavailable so we are again stuck with my unofficial one, which you will
have to take my word on that, is pretty much the same than the
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 08:42:57AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:09 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:16:53AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
But Carlo could probably create a snapshot for
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:46:33AM -0500, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
Some of the most visible changes I can come out with from the top of my head
and that we should be specially looking for regressions as compared with 3.1.0
are:
And of course I forgot one significant (not because of
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:07 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 08:42:57AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:09 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reading through the backlog, what you guys really want is
something similar to zeroconf/bonjour -- have any of you
thought of integrating it with Ganglia?
http://developer.apple.com/opensource/internet/bonjour.html
This is cross-platform, works on Mac OSX, UNIX, Windows.
How I envision it
14 matches
Mail list logo
