On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 01:57:44AM +, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 10:20:32PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
- Can you easily re-compile APR with a different poll implementation? I
think you can change it from configure.
Which option?, --enable-other-child
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 01:57:44AM +, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 10:20:32PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
- Can you easily re-compile APR with a different poll implementation? I
think you can change it from
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:36:02AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
but that of course requires a patched version of apr (including
bootstrapping) and is probably not an option, unless we go back
to the dark ages of including all dependencies statically.
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:36:02AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
but that of course requires a patched version of apr (including
bootstrapping) and is probably not an option, unless we go back
to the dark ages of
fork() doesn't work because the kqueue filehandle is not inherited; using
rfork() instead doesn't either because all filehandles are closed by doing
exit(0) in the parent and so fails in the same way that changing
apr_proc_detach() does when changed to use rfork() instead.
I'm not a BSD
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:17:26AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:36:02AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Can you try re-enabling kqueue and patching apr to use rfork()?
Doesn't work, and fails now on sending of the metrics, because of
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:48:51AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
fork() doesn't work because the kqueue filehandle is not inherited; using
rfork() instead doesn't either because all filehandles are closed by doing
exit(0) in the parent and so fails in the same way that changing
Gladish, Jacob wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Pocock [mailto:dan...@pocock.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 6:49 AM
To: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
Cc: ganglia-develop...@lists.sourceforge.net; Ganglia
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia
On 12/2/2009 at 7:21 AM, in message 4b1677e4.8000...@pocock.com.au, Daniel
Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
I would like gmond to return a non-zero return code if it fails to
initialise, e.g. if it is unable to bind or if it is unable to resolve a
hostname mentioned in gmond.conf
Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 12/2/2009 at 7:21 AM, in message 4b1677e4.8000...@pocock.com.au,
Daniel
Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
I would like gmond to return a non-zero return code if it fails to
initialise, e.g. if it is unable to bind or if it is unable to resolve a
10 matches
Mail list logo
