Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.5 beta ready for final testing

2009-12-03 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 07:41:39PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: Therefore, the approach might need to be some combination of the solutions. E.g. a configure option that allows people to choose the new behaviour or the old behaviour. -1, this will double our supported paths for almost no

Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.5 beta ready for final testing

2009-12-02 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 01:57:44AM +, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 10:20:32PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: - Can you easily re-compile APR with a different poll implementation? I think you can change it from configure. Which option?, --enable-other-child

Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.5 beta ready for final testing

2009-12-02 Thread Daniel Pocock
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 01:57:44AM +, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 10:20:32PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: - Can you easily re-compile APR with a different poll implementation? I think you can change it from

Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.5 beta ready for final testing

2009-12-02 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:36:02AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: but that of course requires a patched version of apr (including bootstrapping) and is probably not an option, unless we go back to the dark ages of including all dependencies statically.

Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.5 beta ready for final testing

2009-12-02 Thread Daniel Pocock
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:36:02AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: but that of course requires a patched version of apr (including bootstrapping) and is probably not an option, unless we go back to the dark ages of

Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.5 beta ready for final testing

2009-12-02 Thread Daniel Pocock
fork() doesn't work because the kqueue filehandle is not inherited; using rfork() instead doesn't either because all filehandles are closed by doing exit(0) in the parent and so fails in the same way that changing apr_proc_detach() does when changed to use rfork() instead. I'm not a BSD

Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.5 beta ready for final testing

2009-12-02 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:17:26AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:36:02AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: Can you try re-enabling kqueue and patching apr to use rfork()? Doesn't work, and fails now on sending of the metrics, because of

Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.5 beta ready for final testing

2009-12-02 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:48:51AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: fork() doesn't work because the kqueue filehandle is not inherited; using rfork() instead doesn't either because all filehandles are closed by doing exit(0) in the parent and so fails in the same way that changing

Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.5 beta ready for final testing

2009-12-02 Thread Daniel Pocock
3.1.5 beta ready for final testing fork() doesn't work because the kqueue filehandle is not inherited; using rfork() instead doesn't either because all filehandles are closed by doing exit(0) in the parent and so fails in the same way that changing

Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.5 beta ready for final testing

2009-12-02 Thread Brad Nicholes
On 12/2/2009 at 7:21 AM, in message 4b1677e4.8000...@pocock.com.au, Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote: I would like gmond to return a non-zero return code if it fails to initialise, e.g. if it is unable to bind or if it is unable to resolve a hostname mentioned in gmond.conf

Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.5 beta ready for final testing

2009-12-02 Thread Daniel Pocock
Brad Nicholes wrote: On 12/2/2009 at 7:21 AM, in message 4b1677e4.8000...@pocock.com.au, Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote: I would like gmond to return a non-zero return code if it fails to initialise, e.g. if it is unable to bind or if it is unable to resolve a

Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.5 beta ready for final testing

2009-12-01 Thread Daniel Pocock
At least a revert would be needed for 3.1 as this accounts for a regression but haven't done so either waiting for you to first revert it on trunk and then decide on how to proceed from there depending on how critical this feature was for the release. I agree that it is a

Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.5 beta ready for final testing

2009-11-30 Thread Daniel Pocock
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 08:12:34AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:57:01AM +, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:03:51PM -0800, Bernard Li wrote:

Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.5 beta ready for final testing

2009-11-30 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 01:29:34PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: Your call, eventhough a fix for this feature will be probably preferred as there is nothing special about the BSD for them to be affected and it might be that the problem is therefore more

Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.5 beta ready for final testing

2009-11-29 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:03:51PM -0800, Bernard Li wrote: Please help us test on as many OS/archs as possible, as this would go GA quite immediately ;-) FreeBSD is not able to return any XML data through TCP/8649 (tested with FreeBSD 8.0 amd64). DragonFlyBSD fails to build but a 3.2