On 03/27/2014 10:07 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I made up a rough diagram about how Ganglia 4.x could look:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ganglia/monitor-core/master/doc/planning/ganglia-4.x.png
The biggest change is the introduction of MongoDB
Instead of having the gmetad serve up
I don't understand why all this is necessary.
I strongly disagree with the horizontal scalability of mongoDB ( i run a
very large mongodb cluster in production in addition to other databases)
and would rather suggest a pluggable backend with a simpler default (like
text files or maybe postgresql
mobility?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Alexander Karner
From: Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au
To: ganglia-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
Date: 27.03.2014 21:08
Subject:[Ganglia-general] Ganglia 4.x architecture planning
I made up a rough diagram about how
On 28/03/14 09:07, Alexander Karner wrote:
Hi!
I think we should continue to put an emphasis on portability:
Ganglia is not only used in Linux environments but also on AIX, HP-UX,
Solaris etc.
This includes both, gmond and gmetad (+webserver).
In the earlier reply from Adam, the idea of a
On 27/03/14 21:43, Alex Dean wrote:
On Mar 27, 2014, at 3:07 PM, Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
The introduction of RabbitMQ is an optional dependency. It would allow
users to send commands from the web interface.
1. Why add the extra dependency on rabbitmq? As long as you're
Hi Daniel,
with the introduction of MongoDB you would exclude all big-endian
architectures immediately as MongoDB is little-endian only.
Although there has been big-endian support requested for MongoDB and
some attempts have been made in this direction but at the moment MongoDB
is still
On 28/03/14 11:41, Michael Perzl wrote:
Hi Daniel,
with the introduction of MongoDB you would exclude all big-endian
architectures immediately as MongoDB is little-endian only.
Although there has been big-endian support requested for MongoDB and
some attempts have been made in this direction
On 28/03/14 14:39, Aaron Nichols wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Maxime Brugidou
maxime.brugi...@gmail.com mailto:maxime.brugi...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand why all this is necessary.
I strongly disagree with the horizontal scalability of mongoDB (
i run a very
mobility?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Alexander Karner
From:Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au
To:ganglia-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
Date:27.03.2014 21:08
Subject:[Ganglia-general] Ganglia 4.x architecture planning
_
I made
We may want to clarify what services
from Mongo are we gonna use. Is the intention to use it as a
key/value store or use it for things like capped collections
(http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/tutorial/use-capped-collections-for-fast-writes-and-reads/).
Currently
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Maxime Brugidou
maxime.brugi...@gmail.comwrote:
I don't understand why all this is necessary.
I strongly disagree with the horizontal scalability of mongoDB ( i run a
very large mongodb cluster in production in addition to other databases)
and would rather
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
That has already been discussed in the thread - are you OK with the plugin
idea?
I think so - having an easy built-in default would be ideal.
Knowing you have 180k metrics is only one factor
How many users (both
I made up a rough diagram about how Ganglia 4.x could look:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ganglia/monitor-core/master/doc/planning/ganglia-4.x.png
The biggest change is the introduction of MongoDB
Instead of having the gmetad serve up an XML every time somebody asks to
see the web page,
On 27/03/14 21:16, Adam Compton wrote:
I'm in favor of teaching gmetad how to send the metrics it collects to a
wider variety of things, particularly if there's a plugin interface for
writing them.
That is how rsyslog does it actually - MongoDB is just one of their
output modules, called
On 3/27/14 1:20 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 27/03/14 21:16, Adam Compton wrote:
I'm in favor of teaching gmetad how to send the metrics it collects to a
wider variety of things, particularly if there's a plugin interface for
writing them.
That is how rsyslog does it actually - MongoDB is
I'm in favor of teaching gmetad how to send the metrics it collects to a
wider variety of things, particularly if there's a plugin interface for
writing them.
- Adam
On 3/27/14 1:07 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I made up a rough diagram about how Ganglia 4.x could look:
On Mar 27, 2014, at 3:07 PM, Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
The introduction of RabbitMQ is an optional dependency. It would allow
users to send commands from the web interface.
1. Why add the extra dependency on rabbitmq? As long as you're adding a
persistent data store (mongo),
Hi Adam:
This already exists as gmetad-python -- I have been told that it's not
as scalable as gmetad-C but I would really like someone to pick it up
and run with it:
https://github.com/ganglia/monitor-core/tree/master/gmetad-python
Cheers,
Bernard
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Adam
18 matches
Mail list logo
