Hi Kirk:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct, though this is plainly not a real solution.
This is not an ideal solution, but for now it works.
The new rrdtool is supposed to alleviate some of the I/O issues, you
might want to give that a try.
To
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kirk:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct, though this is plainly not a real solution.
This is not an ideal solution, but for now it works.
The new rrdtool is supposed to
Hi Kirk:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good call! The problem basically vanished when I recompiled with
rrdtool 1.3.0. The TNs reported by gmetad are still slightly higher,
but it no longer appears to scale with the number of hosts I have it
poll.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kirk:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running Ganglia 3.0.7. Let's say I have a large number of
Hi Kirk:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I take this back. I am not sure what I thought I saw with my earlier
test, but looking at the configuration using tmpfs again, it does not
suffer from hosts being marked as down. gmetad's TN values still
average
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kirk:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I take this back. I am not sure what I thought I saw with my earlier
test, but looking at the configuration using tmpfs again, it does not
Bernard Li wrote:
Hi Kirk:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gmetad runs on a certain host. Also on that host are a number of gmond
instances, which are the gmond instances polled by gmetad. Each of
these instances is reported to by a separate
I have a gmetad which probes a number of gmonds, and each gmond has a
number of hosts associated with it. When I scrape the XML from each of
the gmonds probed by gmetad myself, the TN value for each host looks
good (they average well under 10 seconds). However, when I scrape the
XML from gmetad,
Hi Kirk:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a gmetad which probes a number of gmonds, and each gmond has a
number of hosts associated with it. When I scrape the XML from each of
the gmonds probed by gmetad myself, the TN value for each host looks
On 6/25/2008 at 12:13 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a gmetad which probes a number of gmonds, and each gmond has a
number of hosts associated with it. When I scrape the XML from each of
the gmonds probed by gmetad myself, the TN value for each
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One possibility is the time difference between the gmond nodes and the gmetad
host. Gmetad will try to normalize all of the timestamps based on its own
timestamp. If there is a big time difference between a gmond node
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kirk:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a gmetad which probes a number of gmonds, and each gmond has a
number of hosts associated with it. When I scrape the XML from each
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/25/2008 at 12:13 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a gmetad which probes a number of gmonds, and each gmond has a
number of hosts associated with it. When I scrape the
Hi Kirk:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running Ganglia 3.0.7. Let's say I have a large number of hosts.
Since you say you have a large number of hosts, perhaps you are
running into I/O issues with rrd.
I'd suggest running iostat to see what is
On 6/25/2008 at 1:18 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/25/2008 at 12:13 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a gmetad which probes a
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kirk:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running Ganglia 3.0.7. Let's say I have a large number of hosts.
Since you say you have a large number of hosts, perhaps you are
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/25/2008 at 1:18 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/25/2008 at 12:13 PM, in message
[EMAIL
Hi Kirk:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Kirk McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gmetad runs on a certain host. Also on that host are a number of gmond
instances, which are the gmond instances polled by gmetad. Each of
these instances is reported to by a separate cluster, and they are
each a
18 matches
Mail list logo
