La cuenta bancaria de su empresa BBVA se suspende temporalmente.

Su cuenta BBVA Empresas (Net Cash) está temporalmente restringida. Estimado gcc@gcc.gnu.org , su cuenta bancária de BBVA Empresas (Net Cash) está restringida por actividad Inusual. Se adjunta suprueba de transferencia SEPA. Lamentamos cualquier inconveniente que esto pueda causar.

La cuenta bancaria de su empresa BBVA se suspende temporalmente.

Su cuenta BBVA Empresas (Net Cash) está temporalmente restringida. Estimado gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org , su cuenta bancária de BBVA Empresas (Net Cash) está restringida por actividad Inusual. Se adjunta suprueba de transferencia SEPA. Lamentamos cualquier inconveniente que esto pueda

[Bug tree-optimization/88975] ICE: Segmentation fault (in dominated_by_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88975 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.0, 9.3.0 Summary|ICE:

[Bug rtl-optimization/94026] combine missed opportunity to simplify comparisons with zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94026 --- Comment #4 from Fei Yang --- (In reply to Fei Yang from comment #0) > Created attachment 47966 [details] > proposed patch to fix this issue > > Simple test case: > int > foo (int c, int d) > { > int a = (c >> d) & 7; > > if (a >= 2) {

[Bug other/94182] Document -Wchar-subscripts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94182 --- Comment #3 from Roland Illig --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Considering it is documented in another place where char is signed or > unsigned. I don't know if this needs to change. Given only the compiler warning about

[Bug tree-optimization/94125] [9/10 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94125 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Bin Cheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4e9a59105a81cdd6c1328b0a5ed9fe4cc82840e commit r10-7184-ge4e9a59105a81cdd6c1328b0a5ed9fe4cc82840e Author: Bin Cheng Date: Mon Mar

[PATCH] Add C++2a wait/notify_one/notify_all support to std::atomic<>

This patch adds support for wait/notify_one/notify_all to std::atomic<>. Support for the volatile overloads will be added in a subsequent patch. * include/Makefile.am (bits_headers): Add new header. * include/Mamefile.in: Regenerate. * include/bits/atomic_base.h

[PATCH v2] c++: Fix parsing of invalid enum specifiers [PR90995]

On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 05:21:59PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > Let's use temp_override. So like this? Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. 2020-03-15 Jakub Jelinek PR c++/90995 * parser.c (cp_parser_enum_specifier): Use temp_override for

[Bug inline-asm/87733] local register variable not honored with earlyclobber

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87733 --- Comment #36 from Segher Boessenkool --- The kernel jumps back to an instruction *before* the syscall?!? (I do not want to know about that any more, then, I am sure :-) )

[Bug c++/94186] New: compiler incorrectly accepts a requires clause with predicate of non-bool type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94186 Bug ID: 94186 Summary: compiler incorrectly accepts a requires clause with predicate of non-bool type Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

gcc-10-20200315 is now available

Snapshot gcc-10-20200315 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20200315/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

[Bug c++/93248] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in decltype of template constructor with default argument within a class template since r8-2712

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93248 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/92068] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE on invalid in process_partial_specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92068 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/92909] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE on incorrect lambda inside variadic template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92909 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/92909] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE on incorrect lambda inside variadic template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92909 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c3747bca3849b1e06358db9cb2389d8089c49e3e commit r9-8379-gc3747bca3849b1e06358db9cb2389d8089c49e3e Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/92909] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE on incorrect lambda inside variadic template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92909 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eee8f2161e072c1b9da4f334f882c385a27baa1f commit r8-10128-geee8f2161e072c1b9da4f334f882c385a27baa1f Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/92068] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE on invalid in process_partial_specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92068 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fed9ac72ee6c1b36d20a9550803835daaac174db commit r8-10127-gfed9ac72ee6c1b36d20a9550803835daaac174db Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/93248] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in decltype of template constructor with default argument within a class template since r8-2712

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93248 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23690790dd739f1cdd33a8249304b8f17e296c38 commit r8-10126-g23690790dd739f1cdd33a8249304b8f17e296c38 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/93248] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in decltype of template constructor with default argument within a class template since r8-2712

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93248 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb05d702a17476fb658a59a6661d1f69394da786 commit r9-8377-gcb05d702a17476fb658a59a6661d1f69394da786 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/92068] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE on invalid in process_partial_specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92068 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2fa5f9e380b794053a0dd8a8cc63f8bfab370d22 commit r9-8378-g2fa5f9e380b794053a0dd8a8cc63f8bfab370d22 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug target/61872] Assigning to "long double" causes memset to be improperly elided

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61872 Alexander Cherepanov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ch3root at openwall dot com ---

Re: [PATCH] c++: Fix parsing of invalid enum specifiers [PR90995]

On 3/14/20 4:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Hi! The testcase shows some accepts-invalid (the ones without alignas) and ice-on-invalid-code (the ones with alignas) cases. If the enum doesn't have an underlying type and is not a definition, the caller retries to parse it as elaborated type

Re: GSOC

Hello, On Sun, Mar 15 2020, shivam tiwari via Gcc wrote: > In Which Format I have to Send Gsoc Proposal On this Mail PDF or DOC Format if you want to discuss your proposal on this mailing list, then plain text in an email message is the best option. Per GSoC rules (IIRC), the final application

[Bug c++/94185] New: gcc-10 crashes with "error: unable to generate reloads for {*zero_extendsidi2} internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4006

zlib zstd gcc version 10.0.1 20200315 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug middle-end/68785] [6 Regression] valgrind reports issues with folding on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68785 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

Re: [PATCH 1/2] c++: Replay errors during diagnosis of constraint satisfaction failures

On 3/11/20 4:18 PM, Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches wrote: ... Hmm, like this? This version introduces a new static member function diagnosing_failed_constraint::replay_errors_p that checks current_constraint_diagnosis_depth, and also sets max_depth_exceeded_p when appropriate. ... Just one

[Bug c++/94184] Global variable inline constructor elision.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94184 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|

[Bug other/94182] Document -Wchar-subscripts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94182 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Considering it is documented in another place where char is signed or unsigned. I don't know if this needs to change.

[Bug c++/94184] New: Global variable inline constructor elision.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94184 Bug ID: 94184 Summary: Global variable inline constructor elision. Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug inline-asm/93903] invalid input constraint in __asm__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93903 Frédéric Recoules changed: What|Removed |Added CC||frederic.recoules@univ-gren

[Bug inline-asm/94183] New: If constraints allow but only memory, expression should be an lvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94183 Bug ID: 94183 Summary: If constraints allow but only memory, expression should be an lvalue Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

Re: GSOC

Hi! On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 06:49:32PM +0530, shivam tiwari via Gcc wrote: > In Which Format I have to Send Gsoc Proposal On this Mail PDF or DOC Format On this email list, use plain text. Please read , the "Application" section there in particular, in

[Bug other/94182] Document -Wchar-subscripts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94182 --- Comment #1 from Roland Illig --- https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html

[Bug other/94182] New: Document -Wchar-subscripts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94182 Bug ID: 94182 Summary: Document -Wchar-subscripts Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug inline-asm/87733] local register variable not honored with earlyclobber

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87733 --- Comment #35 from Rich Felker --- > Oh, your real code is different, and $10 doesn't work for that? I see. No, the real code is exactly that. What you're missing is that the kernel, entered through syscall, has a jump back to the addu after

[Bug inline-asm/87733] local register variable not honored with earlyclobber

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87733 --- Comment #34 from Segher Boessenkool --- Oh, your real code is different, and $10 doesn't work for that? I see.

[Bug inline-asm/93952] Giving an array in an operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93952 Frédéric Recoules changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID

[Bug target/89229] Incorrect xmm16-xmm31/ymm16-ymm31 in vector move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89229 --- Comment #33 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d74caf21be7025db8fef997e87ebf3b85acaf4a commit r10-7182-g9d74caf21be7025db8fef997e87ebf3b85acaf4a Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sun Mar 15

[Bug c/94179] [10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14399 since r10-7127-gcb99630f254aaec6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94179 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ada/94181] New: Misidentified dangling reference in container implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94181 Bug ID: 94181 Summary: Misidentified dangling reference in container implementation Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[COMMITTED] coroutines: Fix indentation (NFC).

Hi Whitespace-only change. Tested on x86_64-darwin, applied to master. thanks Iain gcc/cp/ChangeLog: 2020-03-15 Iain Sandoe * coroutines.cc (co_await_expander): Fix indentation. diff --git a/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc b/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc index 920575b0f54..f70b3ab69ab 100644

Re: [PATCH] driver: Fix typos in options descriptions

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 01:24:07AM +, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jan 2020, Lewis Hyatt wrote: > > > Is this something that would be desirable to change for GCC 10? Attached > > patch would do so, and the output would become instead: > > This patch is OK. (It may mean some translation

[PATCH] driver: Improve the generated help text for alias options with arguments

Hello- Currently, if an option is both undocumented and an alias for a second option, the help text generated by gcc --help directs the reader to use the other option instead. This makes sense for deprecated options, but it seems this pattern is also used for another case, namely when an option

[Bug other/17898] Incorrect usage of isdigit, etc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17898 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |NEW CC|

Re: [PATCH, d] Committed merge with upstream dmd e9420cfbf

Hi Ian, > This patch merges the D front-end implementation with dmd upstream e9420cfbf. [...] > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu, and committed to trunk. this merge introduced a regression on Solaris (SPARC and x86): +UNRESOLVED: gdc.test/runnable/traits.d compilation failed to

[Bug lto/94157] [10 Regression] error: lto-wrapper failed with -Wa,--noexecstack -Wa,--noexecstack since r10-6807-gf1a681a174cdfb82

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94157 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

GSOC

In Which Format I have to Send Gsoc Proposal On this Mail PDF or DOC Format

[Bug inline-asm/94180] New: inconsistent operand constraints: "+X"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94180 Bug ID: 94180 Summary: inconsistent operand constraints: "+X" Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Bug c/94179] [10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14399 since r10-7127-gcb99630f254aaec6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94179 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- A better test-case: struct kgem_bo { int rq; int list; int pinned_batches[]; } a; int b; void fn1() { (struct kgem_bo *)((char *)_batches[b > 4096] - (char *)&((struct kgem_bo

Spam, bounces and gcc list removal

Hi, since the change to the new list management, there has been an uptick of spam getting through. Spam is bounced by my ISP, and this just resulted in a warning that there were too many bounces and that I would get removed from the list unless I confirmed it (which I then did). So, a request:

[Bug c/94179] [10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14399 since r10-7127-gcb99630f254aaec6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94179 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/94179] New: [10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14399 since r10-7127-gcb99630f254aaec6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94179 Bug ID: 94179 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14399 since r10-7127-gcb99630f254aaec6 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

Re: commits in Bugzilla attributed to others?

On 3/13/20 5:03 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:56:58AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote: On 3/13/20 9:50 AM, Marek Polacek wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:46:40AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote: It looks as though commits with bug fixes appear in Bugzilla comments made by

[Bug c++/67960] [8/9 Regression] Prefixing a function with [[deprecated]] produces multiple warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67960 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug c/94040] [9 Regression] ICE on a call to an invalid redeclaration of strftime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94040 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug rtl-optimization/92303] [10 regression] gcc.target/sparc/ultrasp12.c times out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92303 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/94042] [10 Regression] Bootstrap fails on ppc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94042 --- Comment #50 from Martin Liška --- commit r10-7160-g5c7e6d4bdf879b437b43037e10453275acabf521 Author: Segher Boessenkool Date: Thu Mar 12 07:12:50 2020 + df: Don't abuse bb->aux (PR94148, PR94042) The df dataflow solvers use

[Bug analyzer/94105] ICE in get_region, at analyzer/region-model.h:1744

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94105 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- commit r10-7168-g5c048755ec98645f8436b630df3f9294ca9cbc2a Author: David Malcolm Date: Tue Mar 10 19:03:37 2020 -0400 analyzer: handle NOP_EXPR in get_lvalue [PR94099,PR94105] PR analyzer/94099

[Bug analyzer/94099] ICE in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4874 since r10-7023-g3d66e153b40ed000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94099 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- commit r10-7168-g5c048755ec98645f8436b630df3f9294ca9cbc2a Author: David Malcolm Date: Tue Mar 10 19:03:37 2020 -0400 analyzer: handle NOP_EXPR in get_lvalue [PR94099,PR94105] PR analyzer/94099

[Bug target/92379] rs6000.c:5598:13: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92379 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- commit r10-7169-g50c96067c8ed60f4b3fcbee89fe31c905241b356 Author: Aaron Sawdey Date: Fri Mar 13 18:14:22 2020 -0500 Fix UBSAN error, shifting 64 bit value by 64. 2020-03-13 Aaron Sawdey

[Bug ipa/94178] [10 Regression] wrong code with -fipa-sra + invalid -Wuninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94178 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/93385] [10 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- *** Bug 94178 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug preprocessor/88974] [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in linemap_resolve_location)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88974 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug ipa/94178] New: [10 Regression] wrong code with -fipa-sra + invalid -Wuninitialized warning

0200315012740-g9c3cdb43c2b-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 10.0.1 20200315 (experimental) (GCC)

New Swedish PO file for 'gcc' (version 10.1-b20200209)

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at: https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po (This file,

Amazing news : 55%--68% discount for SICK,OMRON,Siemens,ABB,AB , Schenider,GE, YASKWAS and others brand !!

Hi dear, All our automation PLC parts have a very good discount !!Allen-Bradley, ABB, OMRON,Emerson, Siemens, Schneider, SICK, SOHON, MIGE,Yaskawa, Fujitsu, Mitsubishi, FUJI and other PLC brands. We have one-year guarantee,100% brand new,1-2days delivery. should you have any

Re: [PATCH PR94125]Update post order number for merged SCC

On March 15, 2020 7:12:26 AM GMT+01:00, "bin.cheng via Gcc-patches" wrote: >Hi, >This simple patch fixes PR94125 by updating post order number for >merged SCC. >The root cause is after computing SCC with runtime alias edges skipped, >the post >order info is changed and it's possible a partition

[Bug middle-end/93566] [8/9 Regression] tree-nested.c ICE on C OpenMP array section reduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93566 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/94125] [9/10 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94125 --- Comment #7 from bin cheng --- Patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-March/542038.html It's a latent bug exposed by the mentioned alias analysis change, however: unsigned char b, f; short d[1][8][1], *g = [0][3][0]; int

[PATCH PR94125]Update post order number for merged SCC

Hi, This simple patch fixes PR94125 by updating post order number for merged SCC. The root cause is after computing SCC with runtime alias edges skipped, the post order info is changed and it's possible a partition is scheduled after another where should be scheduled before. Note that updating