https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94573
Bug ID: 94573
Summary: Optimizer produces suboptimal code related to
-fstore-merging
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94504
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|UNCONFIRMED
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 1:48 AM Jim Wilson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 2:20 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
> > - Implied rule are introduced into latest RISC-V ISA spec.
> > - Only implemented D implied F-extension. Zicsr and Zifence are not
> > implement yet, so the rule not included in
Ping 3: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-March/542012.html
Thanks,
- Eddy B.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020, at 00:52, Eduard-Mihai Burtescu wrote:
> Ping 2: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-March/542012.html
>
> Thanks,
> - Eddy B.
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020, at 10:28 PM,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94569
--- Comment #2 from Inbal Levi ---
Yes, you're probably right, got the wrong one.
Thanks!
This bug is exposed by FRE refactor of r263875. Comparing the fre
dump file shows no obvious change of the segment fault function proves
it to be a target issue.
frame_pointer_needed is set to true in reload pass setup_can_eliminate,
but regs_ever_live[31] is false, pro_and_epilogue uses it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94569
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94564
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94572
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94572
Bug ID: 94572
Summary: Expunge references to direct-declarator
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87699
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
See Daniel's testcase for why this is more important than it might seem:
template
bool test(T*)
{
return true;
}
int main()
{
test((int*)(nullptr));
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87699
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87699
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|beliveau0213 at gmail dot com |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94563
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94571
--- Comment #1 from Joel Yliluoma ---
| ^
(Missing line from the paste)
The problem exists since GCC 7. (GCC 6 and earlier did not support structured
bindings.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94571
Bug ID: 94571
Summary: Error: Expected comma or semicolon, comma found
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
Snapshot gcc-10-20200412 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20200412/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On 4/10/20 8:52 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/9/20 4:23 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/9/20 1:32 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/9/20 3:24 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/9/20 1:03 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/8/20 1:23 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/7/20 3:36 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Apr
We must restore the frame pointer in word_mode for eh_return epilogues
since the upper 32 bits of RBP register can have any values.
Tested on Linux/x32 and Linux/x86-64. OK for master and backport to
GCC 8/9 branches?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
PR target/94556
* config/i386/i386.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94570
Bug ID: 94570
Summary: -fprofile-dir is broken on Cygwin
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94569
Bug ID: 94569
Summary: alignas(object) with a weaker (smaller) alignment than
the alignas(type) of it's type compiles, inconsistent
with the C++ standard
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94568
Bug ID: 94568
Summary: template specialization of equivalent nontype template
argument involving member pointer considered distinct
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94556
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94090
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
On Thu, 2020-04-09 at 21:17 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 07:43:02PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > Therefore it is only fair to warn the community and any possible hidden
> > users or would-be users that it is very likely that I will propose
> > removal of HSAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53077
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|dominiq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89938
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|dominiq at lps dot ens.fr |unassigned at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|dominiq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58200
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84594
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|dominiq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58200
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|dominiq at lps dot ens.fr |unassigned at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94090
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Confirmed at least down to gfortran 7.
Down to gfortran 5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89494
--- Comment #16 from Piotr Kubaj ---
634afa05a8cbff010480088811fe1f39eca70c1d is the first bad commit
commit 634afa05a8cbff010480088811fe1f39eca70c1d
Author: Richard Sandiford
Date: Tue Aug 20 08:53:52 2019 +
Make function.c use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94090
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86859
Baptiste Parsy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||baptiste.parsy at epita dot fr
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94091
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Hi,
I just committed a test case for PR 94091 as obvious.
I had to fight git tooth and nail to do this.
I'm sure that git does wonderful things for you when you
have a mental picture in your mind of what is actually
going on For people who don't, it is a catastrophe, and
this includes most of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94091
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87be4cecfc6e42390303be1ca92bc8bc587b0bd6
commit r10-7691-g87be4cecfc6e42390303be1ca92bc8bc587b0bd6
Author: Thomas König
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94556
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
The code looks like:
vmovq %xmm2, %r15
vmovq %xmm3, %rbp
.LEHB0:
callpthread_exit
.LEHE0:
.L15:
movl%eax, %ebx
.L14:
vmovq %rbp, %xmm0
movl$4,
We are hitting a recursive loop when printing the signature of a function
containing a decltype([]{}) type. The loop is
dump_function_decl -> dump_substitution
-> dump_template_bindings
-> dump_type
-> dump_aggr_type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92550
--- Comment #10 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 48257
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48257=edit
Patch to fix argument alignment
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 4/10/20 5:47 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 4/10/20 2:15 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > >
Hi,
This has been on my TODO for a while, it fixes up a bunch of tests
that changed when the default shifted to no-common.
tested on x86_64-darwin16 / x86-64-linux-gnu
applied to master,
thanks
Iain
Darwin mandates an indirection for variables in the commmon
section. Since the change to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94561
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89494
Piotr Kubaj changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard.sandiford at arm dot
com
---
45 matches
Mail list logo
