https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94931
Bug ID: 94931
Summary: request: print include path
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94922
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94930
Bug ID: 94930
Summary: Failure to optimize out subvsi in expansion of
__builtin_memcmp with 1 as the operand with -ftrapv
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Snapshot gcc-10-20200502 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20200502/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94923
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0, 8.4.0, 9.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94929
Bug ID: 94929
Summary: GCC 8 chokes on std::max in alignas
Product: gcc
Version: 8.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94923
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94928
Bug ID: 94928
Summary: Doc comments in gcov-io.h do not show cwd and unexec
blocks in the Notes file format
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94912
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68531
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gabravier at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94927
Bug ID: 94927
Summary: cortex-m7: Incorrect insn_reservation for
vmaxnm/vminnm instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94926
Bug ID: 94926
Summary: [9 regression] invalid use of incomplete type not
recogniced for static self reference of templated
struct
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 6:04 AM Thomas Koenig via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hello world,
>
> because the test case for PR 94788 requires -fsanitize=address to expose
> the double free, I have created a subdirectory under gfortran.dg
> where such test cases can go.
>
> I have tested this with
>
> make
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94788
--- Comment #44 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6abe1c3084798d3e5f32926c352643e557073e01
commit r11-27-g6abe1c3084798d3e5f32926c352643e557073e01
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sat May 2
> This fixes three compilation errors preventing bootstrap of gcc-10/11
> with Ada on x86_64-pc-cygwin. See PR bootstrap/94918 for details.
>
> Tested by bootstrapping on x86_64-pc-cygwin, and since it touches code
> shared with mingw, also by building a cross to x86_64-w64-mingw32.
>
> Ok for
This fixes three compilation errors preventing bootstrap of gcc-10/11
with Ada on x86_64-pc-cygwin. See PR bootstrap/94918 for details.
Tested by bootstrapping on x86_64-pc-cygwin, and since it touches code
shared with mingw, also by building a cross to x86_64-w64-mingw32.
Ok for master and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94918
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0, 8.4.0, 9.3.0
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93861
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Hi,
As noted in the PR, there’s a missing ‘-‘ at the start of a diagnostic
switch. Fixed thus.
tested on x86_64-darwin16,
applied to master,
thanks
Iain
gcc/ChangeLog:
2020-05-02 Iain Sandoe
PR translation/93861
* config/darwin-driver.c (darwin_driver_init): Adjust
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93861
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7df457899078c5889194c1736cffcfd4d50f5305
commit r11-26-g7df457899078c5889194c1736cffcfd4d50f5305
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93861
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||*-darwin*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94925
Bug ID: 94925
Summary: Undesired runtime warning message
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94923
--- Comment #2 from dawid_jurek at vp dot pl ---
Yeah, that's the correct reproducer of issue I reported.
I noticed missing bracket after pasting it from godbolt but unfortunately
couldn't edit my comment after posting.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94923
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94788
--- Comment #43 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:116784bbde9ed391393320d936ae2fff37442779
commit r11-25-g116784bbde9ed391393320d936ae2fff37442779
Author: Thomas Koenig
Date:
לרגל המצב משרד האוצר העמיד 14 מיליארד תוספת של 6 מיליארד
לטובת עסקים נפגעי הקורונה
וכעת קבלו גם ייעוץ לצמיחה מחודשת לעסק
אופציה להגשת בקשת מימון כפולה
מקרן ערבות מדינה ומקרן קורונה
אופציה לגרייס לשנה עד חצי מיליון שח. 500,000 שח
תנאי סף ללא חזרות המחאות מהחשבון בשנה האחרונה . ללא אכ"מ
לבדיקת
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #210 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-05-02 12:14 a.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> Looks like we might have to get the fix into GNU AS first to get PCREL60B
> working. I will try to look into how we can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94924
Bug ID: 94924
Summary: Default equality operator for C-array compares
addresses, not data
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94923
Bug ID: 94923
Summary: False positive -Wclass-memaccess with trivially
copyable std::optional
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94921
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
x + y ?
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 10:37:48PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> On Fri, May 01 2020, Jeff Law wrote:
> >> I also find writing them useful as it forces me to go through every
> >> patch one last time before submitting it :-) If you spend some time
> >> configuring your text editor and git, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94922
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
Another testcase that exhibits the 10/11 regression:
struct base {};
struct derived : base {};
void
foo()
{
derived a = derived(base());
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94922
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka ---
The above appears to be a 10/11 regression, but note that all versions of GCC
>= 4.7 also incorrectly accept the following testcase:
struct base {};
struct derived : base {};
template
void foo();
void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94922
Bug ID: 94922
Summary: Functional cast from base class to derived class
incorrectly accepted with -std=c++2a
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 09:51:53AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-04-23 at 15:14 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > > > > > > "Segher" == Segher Boessenkool
> > > > > > > writes:
> >
> > Segher> My point was that this should *never* be part of patches, already.
> >
> > FWIW, I use a few
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94921
Bug ID: 94921
Summary: Failure to optimize nots with sub into single add
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118
--- Comment #34 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #33)
> What's going to happen with the fix? It works for me on
> sparc-sun-solaris2.11
> and obviously several other targets. This has been open for months now with
> a
Currently patchable area is at the wrong place. It is placed immediately
after function label, before both .cfi_startproc and ENDBR. This patch
adds UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA for pseudo patchable area instruction and
changes ENDBR insertion pass to also insert patchable area instruction.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94919
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
This seems related to another one you reported, in the category: i&-b == b?i:0
(for b∈{0,1}). The first form has the advantage of no branch, while the second
is less obfuscated and simplifies more naturally
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94920
Bug ID: 94920
Summary: Failure to optimize abs pattern from arithmetic with
selected operands based on comparisons with 0
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
../../gcc/config/tilegx/tilegx.md:4109:1: ambiguous attribute 'n'; could be '1'
(via 'I124MODE:n') or '4' (via 'I48MODE:n')
../../gcc/config/tilegx/tilegx.md:4109:1: ambiguous attribute 'n'; could be '1'
(via 'I124MODE:n') or '' (via 'I48MODE:n')
../../gcc/config/tilegx/tilegx.md:4109:1:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94919
Bug ID: 94919
Summary: Failure to recognize max pattern
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94918
Bug ID: 94918
Summary: Ada bootstrap errors on Cygwin64
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93114
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 48430
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48430=edit
Preliminary partial patch
Here is a very preliminary implementation, which only looks at
the return values of maxloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94917
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94917
Bug ID: 94917
Summary: Ada bootstrap errors on Cygwin64
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94916
Bug ID: 94916
Summary: Failure to optimize pattern into difference or zero
selector
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94915
Bug ID: 94915
Summary: MAX_EXPR weirdly optimized on x86 with -mtune=core2
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
48 matches
Mail list logo
