https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94895
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-04
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94907
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94909
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94926
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94928
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94932
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-04
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94937
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94938
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
On 5/1/20 10:04 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 09:23:33AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
On 4/30/20 11:21 PM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
The first release candidate for GCC 10.1 is available from
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10.1.0-RC-20200430/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94910
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94931
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 01:33:43AM +, ryofurue at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94931
>
> --- Comment #4 from Ryo Furue ---
> > There is only place gfortran will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94938
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94938
Bug ID: 94938
Summary: internal compiler error: in
value_dependent_expression_p, at cp/pt.c:26522
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94931
--- Comment #4 from Ryo Furue ---
> There is only place gfortran will search for files that
> it installs for intrinsic modules, openmp files, and
> openacc files. There are no user files here.
I see your point!
So, should a library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94931
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 01:13:22AM +, ryofurue at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94931
>
> --- Comment #2 from Ryo Furue ---
> Thanks for the detailed description.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94931
--- Comment #2 from Ryo Furue ---
Thanks for the detailed description.
> % gfcx -v -o z a.f90 | & grep -- -fin
>
> yields
>
> -fintrinsic-modules-path
> /usr/home/kargl/work/lib/gcc/i586-unknown-freebsd13.0/10.0.0/finclude
So, I wonder if
Snapshot gcc-11-20200503 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20200503/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
GCC manual (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Function-Basics.html)
states that a result tree for a FUNCTION_DECL can be obtained by using a
DECL_RESULT macro. This does not seem to be the case when processing
user-defined attributes via a plugin - when GCC calls my callback for
handling the
On 03.05.20 18:27, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 01.05.2020 21:49, Andreas Tobler wrote:
Hi all,
FreeBSD does not have the alloca.h header. Do not include it in the test
cases which do include alloca.h.
There are two versions of this patch available, the one attached which
uses ifdef or another
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po
(This file,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94937
--- Comment #2 from Christoph ---
Created attachment 48434
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48434=edit
Pre-processed source code
Replace gen_rtx_PLUS with a GEN_INT with plus_constant.
2020-05-03 Uroš Bizjak
* config/i386/i386-expand.c (ix86_expand_int_movcc):
Use plus_constant instead of gen_rtx_PLUS with GEN_INT.
(emit_memmov): Ditto.
(emit_memset): Ditto.
(ix86_expand_strlensi_unroll_1): Ditto.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94937
--- Comment #1 from Christoph ---
Created attachment 48433
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48433=edit
S file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94937
Bug ID: 94937
Summary: ICE with if constexpr (in cp_get_fndecl_from_callee,
at cp/cvt.c:1000)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:23 AM Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> Hi:
> This patch is about to enable GCC support for SERIALIZE which would
> be in GLC. There's only 1 instruction: SERIALIZE, more details please
> refer to
>
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:27 AM Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> Hi:
> This patch is about to enable GCC support for TSXLDTRK which would
> be in GLC. There's only 2 instructions: XRESLDTRK, XSUSLDTRK, more
> details please
> refer to
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94780
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab ---
This also crashes on riscv64:
/daten/riscv64/gcc/gcc-20200502/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr94780.c: In function
'foo':
/daten/riscv64/gcc/gcc-20200502/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr94780.c:8:1: internal
compiler error:
On 01.05.2020 21:49, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> FreeBSD does not have the alloca.h header. Do not include it in the test
> cases which do include alloca.h.
>
> There are two versions of this patch available, the one attached which
> uses ifdef or another one which defines alloca with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94905
--- Comment #6 from Arseny Solokha ---
Thank you.
(In reply to Dr. Jürgen Sauermann from comment #5)
> Not sure how I can create a testcase file other than preprocessing or
> minimizing it.
Of course preprocessing is what you've been asked to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94905
--- Comment #5 from Dr. Jürgen Sauermann ---
Hi,
above is one preprocessed source file for which the warning has occurred. g++
version was 11.0.0 (latest from github).
Compiled with:
g++ -E -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..-Wall -I sql -Werror
TI has clarified [1] that R3.w0 is caller saved, so allow compiler to
use it. This is safe change because older GCC versions treat R3.w0 as
fixed register and never use it.
[1] https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/ccs/f/81/t/849993
gcc/ChangeLog:
2020-05-03 Dimitar Dimitrov
*
Use the new @insn syntax for simpler gen_* invocation.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2020-05-03 Dimitar Dimitrov
* config/pru/pru.c (pru_emit_doloop): Use new gen_doloop_end_internal
and gen_doloop_begin_internal.
(pru_reorg_loop): Use gen_pruloop with mode.
*
Per clarification in [1], macro is supposed to check for partial
clobbering of single HW registers. Since PRU declares only 8-bit
HW registers, and ABI does not define individual bit clobbering,
it is safe to remove the implementation.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-09/msg00778.html
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-05-03 Dimitar Dimitrov
* gcc.target/pru/clobber-sp.c: New test.
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/pru/clobber-sp.c | 24 +++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
gcc/ChangeLog:
2020-05-03 Dimitar Dimitrov
* config/pru/pru.c (pru_print_operand): Fix fall through comment.
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov
---
gcc/config/pru/pru.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/pru/pru.c b/gcc/config/pru/pru.c
One of the changes frees a previously fixed register, per
ABI clarification from TI, for local usage from function.
The change is backwards compatible.
Rest of changes are cleanups.
Testsuite did not reveal any regressions.
Dimitar Dimitrov (5):
PRU: Fix comment to avoid fall through warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94905
--- Comment #4 from Dr. Jürgen Sauermann ---
Created attachment 48431
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48431=edit
preprocessed apl-Bif_F12_FORMAT.cc, gzip'ed
preprocessed source file apl-Bif_F12_FORMAT.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94931
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94905
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 9:46 PM Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>
> > This fixes three compilation errors preventing bootstrap of gcc-10/11
> > with Ada on x86_64-pc-cygwin. See PR bootstrap/94918 for details.
> >
> > Tested by bootstrapping on x86_64-pc-cygwin, and since it touches code
> > shared with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94930
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
AFAIK -ftrapv doesn't work very well and is kind of abandoned, in favor of
-fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow (possibly with
-fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error), which does generate the code you expect.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93993
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94905
--- Comment #2 from Dr. Jürgen Sauermann ---
I checked different g++ versions; the problem occurs in versions 9, 10, and 11
of g++ but not in version 8.
I tried to shrink the code to the bare minimum but if I do so then the warning
is no longer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94933
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on master, backport for gcc-10 will have to wait until after the 10.1
release.
The overload for byte types uses memset and isn't constexpr. This adds
the specifier and uses std::is_constant_evaluated() to provide a
compile-time alternative.
PR libstdc++/94933
* include/bits/stl_algobase.h (__fill_a1): Make overload for byte types
usable in constant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94933
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:22b6b5d6cfb76deb68ca5bc0bcae8b4245df946d
commit r11-30-g22b6b5d6cfb76deb68ca5bc0bcae8b4245df946d
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90943
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.4 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94896
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc-*-* |sparc-*-* riscv64-*-*
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94936
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94936
Bug ID: 94936
Summary: pmr::synchronized_pool_resource crashes without
-pthread
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94933
--- Comment #2 from rhalbersma ---
Sorry, my bad, but that particular overload of __fill_a1 calls
__builtin_memset. I was under the impression that this was the reason for the
missing constexpr. It would be great if simply adding
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94935
Bug ID: 94935
Summary: Failure to emit call to absvsi2 for __builtin_abs with
-ftrapv
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94933
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94934
Bug ID: 94934
Summary: Failure to inline addv
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94933
Bug ID: 94933
Summary: std::fill_n delegates to __builtin_memset which is not
constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94929
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||6.4.0, 7.5.0, 8.4.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94929
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90736
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||soap at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #9
Hi H.J.,
I checked in this patch to fix:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-regression/2020-May/072549.html
Thanks for the fix!
Ping.
There is a new mangle string "Nm" in the abi to denote the @live attribute,
however will add support in a follow up patch.
On 15 April 2020 12:04:29 CEST, Iain Buclaw via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>Ping.
>
>On 04/04/2020 13:33, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some small improvements and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94932
Bug ID: 94932
Summary: ICE in ovl_skip_hidden, at cp/tree.c:2292
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
61 matches
Mail list logo
