On June 26, 2020 3:24:24 AM GMT+02:00, Alan Lehotsky wrote:
>On Jun 25, 2020, at 6:37 PM, Jeff Law
>mailto:l...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 15:46 -0400, Alan Lehotsky wrote:
>I’m working on a GCC 8.3 port to a load/store architecture with a
>32-bit data-path between registers and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95906
Bug ID: 95906
Summary: Failure to recognize max pattern with mask
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
On Jun 25, 2020, at 6:37 PM, Jeff Law mailto:l...@redhat.com>>
wrote:
On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 15:46 -0400, Alan Lehotsky wrote:
I’m working on a GCC 8.3 port to a load/store architecture with a 32-bit
data-path between registers and memory;
looking at the gcc.dg/loop-9.c test, I fail to pass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95905
--- Comment #1 from Gabriel Ravier ---
The same pattern with _mm_unpacklo_epi16/32 and the corresponding SSE4
intrinsics can also be optimized in the same way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95905
Bug ID: 95905
Summary: Failure to optimize _mm_unpacklo_epi8 with 0 as right
operand to _mm_cvtepu8_epi16
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95904
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
On 6/25/20 6:54 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Okay for trunk (maybe leave out the comma part). Thanks!
Ok, I pushed the patch without the ',' change. Thanks!
Peter
Hi!
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 06:36:51PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> rs6000: Add support for __builtin_cpu_is ("power10")
>
> Add support for __builtin_cpu_is ("power10"). Also add documentation for
> the recently added "arch_3_1" and "mma" __builtin_cpu_supports arguments.
> gcc/
> *
:
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20200625/include/c++/11.0.0/variant: In
instantiation of 'static constexpr auto
std::__detail::__variant::__gen_vtable_impl, std::integer_sequence >::_S_apply() [with _Result_type =
std::__detail::__variant::__deduce_visit_result; _Visitor =
main()::&&
rs6000: Add support for __builtin_cpu_is ("power10")
Add support for __builtin_cpu_is ("power10"). Also add documentation for
the recently added "arch_3_1" and "mma" __builtin_cpu_supports arguments.
This passed bootstrap and regtesting with no regressions. Ok for trunk?
Peter
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90333
--- Comment #9 from Timothee Besset ---
First test case is still a problem in 9.3 and 10:
[]() __attribute__((always_inline)) -> int { return 0; }
Fix proposed in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95883
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
--- Comment #13 from Timothee Besset ---
Fix proposed in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95883
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95883
--- Comment #2 from Timothee Besset ---
Created attachment 48787
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48787=edit
Add a parse for gnu attributes before CPP_DEREF, fixes regression
Proposed patch. Add a parsing for gnu attributes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95903
Bug ID: 95903
Summary: gcc 10: wrong code with -fwrapv
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91104
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91104
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08ca2d744d50d0d5a341530031e6bbb82831109f
commit r11-1668-g08ca2d744d50d0d5a341530031e6bbb82831109f
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
Fixed by r271705.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/91104
* g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-variadic21.C: New test.
---
.../g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-variadic21.C | 26 +++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
create mode
Hi!
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 03:20:18PM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> * config/rs6000/altivec.md (UNSPEC_XXSPLTIW, UNSPEC_XXSPLTID,
> UNSPEC_XXSPLTI32DX): New.
> (vxxspltiw_v4si, vxxspltiw_v4sf_inst, vxxspltidp_v2df_inst,
> vxxsplti32dx_v4si_inst, vxxsplti32dx_v4sf_inst): New
On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 15:46 -0400, Alan Lehotsky wrote:
> I’m working on a GCC 8.3 port to a load/store architecture with a 32-bit
> data-path between registers and memory;
>
> looking at the gcc.dg/loop-9.c test, I fail to pass because I have split the
> move of a double constant to memory
Snapshot gcc-8-20200625 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20200625/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
From: y2s82 <1997371+y2...@users.noreply.github.com>
This patch adds some unit tests for omp-tools.h header. It also adds some simple
functions variables related to OMPD API versions and dll locations.
It also partially defines the OMPD initialization function.
More OMPD configuration is also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
Timothee Besset changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ttimo at valvesoftware dot com
---
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 03:52:12PM -0400, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 6/23/20 6:58 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > 95568 complains that CTAD for aggregates doesn't work within
> > requires-clause and it turned out that it doesn't work when we try
> > the deduction in a template. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91416
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 95902 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95902
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95902
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95902
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
Hi!
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 03:20:14PM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> +;; Map UNSPEC_SLDB to "l" and UNSPEC_SRDB to "r".
> +(define_int_attr SLDB_LR [(UNSPEC_SLDB "l")
> + (UNSPEC_SRDB "r")])
Most (all?) other attributes that always result in lower case strings
are written in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93423
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
A simple situation where a NULL pointer dereference occurs during error
recovery.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
OK for master / backports?
Thanks,
Harald
PR fortran/93423 - ICE on invalid with argument list for module procedure
When recovering from an error, a NULL pointer dereference
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95902
Bug ID: 95902
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected tree_list, have ggc_freed in
get_attribute_name, at attribs.c:841
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:34 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 2:54 PM Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>
> > On 6/25/20 2:34 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > RTEMS supports over 15 processor architectures and we would like to
> > ensure
> > > that TLS is supported on all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95901
Bug ID: 95901
Summary: [C, C++] OpenACC, OpenMP executable directives wrongly
refused after labels
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 2:54 PM Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 6/25/20 2:34 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > RTEMS supports over 15 processor architectures and we would like to
> ensure
> > that TLS is supported on all rather than just a handful of popular ones
> > (arm, x86, powerpc, sparc,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95877
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93337
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
This PR is due to a plain NULL pointer that needs to get caught in the right
place.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
OK for master / backports where applicable?
Thanks,
Harald
PR fortran/93337 - ICE in gfc_dt_upper_string, at fortran/module.c:441
When declaring a polymorphic variable that
Tag the floating-point calling convention used on m68k-elf (either hard-float
or soft-float) through the GNU assembler attribute. The use of the tag enables
the linker to ensure linked objects use a consistent floating-point ABI and
allows tools like GDB to infer the ABI used from the ELF file. It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93337
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
On 6/25/20 2:34 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi
RTEMS supports over 15 processor architectures and we would like to ensure
that TLS is supported on all rather than just a handful of popular ones
(arm, x86, powerpc, sparc, etc). I know of Ulrich Drepper's document (
I’m working on a GCC 8.3 port to a load/store architecture with a 32-bit
data-path between registers and memory;
looking at the gcc.dg/loop-9.c test, I fail to pass because I have split the
move of a double constant to memory into multiple moves (4 in fact, because I
only have a 16-bit
Joseph Myers writes:
> I think both the patches in this discussion (special { 0 } handling
> and the new warning option) generally look good.
I also wrote another small patch, which you might have missed since it's
buried in the discussion here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95827
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69240fb9428513687d451af19fb762687fe65786
commit r10-8370-g69240fb9428513687d451af19fb762687fe65786
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95877
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95689
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reverted on 8- and 9-branch, since not a critical regression, and a clean
backport would need a manual backport of a series of other fixes.
Hi Thomas,
> Thanks for tackling this! I haven't checked, but you are
> probably setting a new record for bug fixes per second now :-)
I'm trying hard, but I definitely cannot outpace Gerhard. Any attempt
in this regard seems futile. |-:
The good thing is that while hunting down things
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95828
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:77d455ee81ec3a23f8b20259a31ab963716f8e82
commit r11-1667-g77d455ee81ec3a23f8b20259a31ab963716f8e82
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
Hi
RTEMS supports over 15 processor architectures and we would like to ensure
that TLS is supported on all rather than just a handful of popular ones
(arm, x86, powerpc, sparc, etc). I know of Ulrich Drepper's document (
https://www.akkadia.org/drepper/tls.pdf) but it is a few years old and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95826
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35a335a159216548fc77263ac5df71ff29d3f448
commit r11-1666-g35a335a159216548fc77263ac5df71ff29d3f448
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
I think both the patches in this discussion (special { 0 } handling and
the new warning option) generally look good. I don't see you in the FSF
copyright assignment list; could you complete
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/plain/doc/Copyright/request-assign.future
(unless you're
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:27:32PM -0400, y2s1982 . via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/libgomp/libgompd.map
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> > > +OMPD_5.0 {
> > > + global:
> > > + ompd_dll_locations_valid;
> >
> > ompd_dll_locations and ompd_dll_locations_valid both need to be
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:17:05PM -0400, y2s1982 . wrote:
> Ah, so code in env.c gets executed before OMPD gets started?
Not all, but initialize_env is the library constructor (has constructor
attribute) and is invoked during the library initialization.
>
> Include omp-tools.h and
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Asher Gordon via Gcc-patches wrote:
> I see. So perhaps this isn't the best way to go about implementing
> attribute locations. What do you think would be a better way? Perhaps
> using a DECL_MINIMAL for attributes?
In general, too many things in GCC have the static type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90174
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #12)
> (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #11)
> > I just expressed my point of view to the bottom-up approach. If somebody
> > implements any new RA
Hi!
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 03:53:42PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> Test that stack protection generates prefixed stack instructions if you are
> using large stack frame for -mcpu=future.
>
> 2020-06-01 Michael Meissner
>
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-stack-protect.c: New test.
>
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 01:05:12PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> [PATCH 6/7, V2] PowerPC tests: Add PC-relative tests.
>
> These tests make sure that PC-relative variant is generated for -mcpu=future
> on
> systems that support PC-relative addressing. The only difference
> is I reworded the
Hi!
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 01:03:51PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> [PATCH 5/7, V2] PowerPC tests: Prefixed insn with large offsets
>
> Add tests to make sure for -mcpu=future that prefixed load/store instructions
> are generated if the offset is larger than 16 bits. The only difference
>
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 03:53:39PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> This test makes sure we do not generate a prefixed instruction with an update
> form.
>
> 2020-06-01 Michael Meissner
>
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-no-update.c: New test.
Okay like 2 and 3. Thanks!
Segher
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 03:53:38PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> Add test to make sure prefixed load/store instructions are generated if the
> offset would not fit in the DS/DQ encodings.
>
> 2020-06-01 Michael Meissner
>
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-ds-dq.c: New test.
Okay for
Nick Clifton writes:
> Hi Nick, Hi Ian,
>>> In file included from gold/archive.cc:29:
>>> include/libiberty.h:646:25: error: 'register' storage class
>>> specifier is deprecated and incompatible with C++17
>>> [-Werror,-Wdeprecated-register]
>>>
>>> So I would like to
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 03:53:37PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> Add tests for -mcpu=future that test the generation of PADDI (and PLI which
> becomes PADDI).
>
> 2020-06-01 Michael Meissner
>
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-add.c: New test.
> *
>
>
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/libgomp/libgompd.map
> > @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> > +OMPD_5.0 {
> > + global:
> > + ompd_dll_locations_valid;
>
> ompd_dll_locations and ompd_dll_locations_valid both need to be exported,
> but not from libgompd.so.1 but from libgomp.so.1, so they need to go into
>
Hello Jakub,
Thank you for the feedback. I can't believe I made some careless mistakes.
I am also very interested in learning some new techniques mentioned. I had
some questions about them.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 4:28 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/libgomp/libgompd.map
PING
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020, 13:24 Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Howdy.
>
> This moves all the simplification code from vr_values into a separate
> class (simplify_using_ranges). In doing so, we get rid of a bunch of
> dependencies on the internals of vr_values. The goal is to (a) remove
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95888
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95900
Bug ID: 95900
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr95866.c in r11-1647
fails
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 16:41 +0100, Nick Clifton via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am checking in the patch below to fix several failures in the GCC
> testsuite for the M32R target. The issue is the movsicc pattern which
> is a holdover from when the port from converted from using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95899
--- Comment #2 from Chris Elrod ---
Interesting. Compiling with:
gcc -march=native -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -Ofast -funroll-loops -S
dot.c -o dot.s
Yields:
```
.L4:
vmovupd (%rdi,%r11), %zmm9
vmovupd 64(%rdi,%r11),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95075
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Hi,
This patch removes another dependency on the front-end OutBuffer type.
As the DMD front-end never frees allocated memory, the glue layer
between the DMD front-end and GCC should generally avoid using DMD types
and interfaces if the purpose is internal only.
Bootstrapped and regression
Hi Guys,
I am checking in the patch below to fix several failures in the GCC
testsuite for the M32R target. The issue is the movsicc pattern which
is a holdover from when the port from converted from using cc0. The
pattern was written as if a previous instruction had set the CC bits,
Hi,
This patch makes deprecation warnings the default in gdc, fixing both
the library and any tests that are currently using deprecated styles.
This is the default in the upstream reference compiler, and can reduce
some confusion when comparing warning/error messages of gdc and dmd side
by side.
Hi,
This patch moves d_signed_type and d_unsigned_type to types.cc.
These two functions are not tied to the language-specific part of the
front-end in any way.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu, and committed to
mainline.
Regards
Iain.
---
gcc/d/ChangeLog:
*
Hi,
This patch merges the D front-end implementation with upstream dmd
90450f3ef. Fixes a regression caused by an incomplete backport of
converting the Expression semantic pass to a Visitor.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu, and committed to
mainline.
Regards
Iain.
---
Hi,
This patch merges the D front-end implementation with upstream dmd
5fc1806cd. Backports the OutBuffer interface from upstream dmd master,
removing another difference this and the self-hosted D branch that is
purely refactoring, and doesn't introduce any mechanical changes.
Bootstrapped and
Hi,
This patch merges the D front-end implementation with upstream dmd
4f1046222. Renames OnScopeStatement to ScopeGuardStatement.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu, and committed to
mainline.
Regards
Iain.
---
gcc/d/ChangeLog:
* dmd/MERGE: Merge upstream dmd
Hi,
This patch removes the implicit setting of DECL_DECLARATED_INLINE_P on
member function.
This has been questionable behaviour since it was added, and though it
has no effect on wider discussions around what should be the correct
semantics of pragma(inline) within D modules, doing this
Hi,
This patch merges the D front-end implementation with upstream dmd
4be011355. Fixes self-assignment warnings seen when compiling with
clang.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu, and committed to
mainline.
Regards
Iain.
---
gcc/d/ChangeLog:
PR d/95075
*
Hi,
This patch fixes an ICE in uda_attribute_p when looking up an unknown
attribute. The target attribute table is not guaranteed to be set by
all backends.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu, and committed to
mainline.
Regards
Iain.
---
gcc/d/ChangeLog:
PR
Hi,
This patch fixes a logic bug in the code-gen for variable declarations.
Declarations initialized with `= void` were being default initialized.
That is not really the intent, and misses the small optimization that
should have been gained from using void initializations.
Bootstrapped and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95173
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62e02c8729a75c4a859edc18e0bcafb87d717f46
commit r11-1658-g62e02c8729a75c4a859edc18e0bcafb87d717f46
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95075
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b7b352a8379dbdd74c962d11951982e21e20f13
commit r11-1662-g1b7b352a8379dbdd74c962d11951982e21e20f13
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95250
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d19c9cd3dd99ba8885c0fc93223918399f73939
commit r11-1661-g1d19c9cd3dd99ba8885c0fc93223918399f73939
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95899
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
On 6/25/20 11:15 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi,
The PR points out that the standard does not restrict promise
expressions to methods, but the current implementation does.
The patch factors out the building of a general promise expression,
and then uses it in a fairly mechanical replacement of each
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67311
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus ---
Submitted patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/548920.html
Hi,
The PR points out that the standard does not restrict promise
expressions to methods, but the current implementation does.
The patch factors out the building of a general promise expression,
and then uses it in a fairly mechanical replacement of each case
that we need such an expressions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95899
Bug ID: 95899
Summary: -funroll-loops does not duplicate accumulators when
calculating reductions, failing to break up dependency
chains
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95837
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95837
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f48bffe70cba310461ec19ffcd07c573a6b86575
commit r11-1654-gf48bffe70cba310461ec19ffcd07c573a6b86575
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95839
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
OK, I have a patch doing BIT_FIELD_REFs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95898
Bug ID: 95898
Summary: Wrong backtrace infromation at Og
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Hi Tobias!
On 2020-06-24T15:36:25+0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> [...] who knows
> what users are doing...
Indeed. ;-)
> On 6/23/20 9:36 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> I don't think I can approve, but seems fine if this works (as you've
>> confirmed) -- it's one incremental step forward!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95869
Kwok Yeung changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
Hi Tobias,
OK – with assert or without?
I don't think the assert is needed - if things go wrong there, then
I am quite sure that we will get all sorts of ICEs downstream if
this is not set correctly somewhere after all, and your testing
indicates that it is not.
Besides, I like the elegance
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95895
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95897
Bug ID: 95897
Summary: [11 regression] gfortran.dg/graphite/pr40982.f90
fails with ICE starting with r11-1649
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
The test case was giving an ICE as it recursively called itself.
Rather obvious fix.
OK for the trunk?
Tobias
-
Mentor Graphics (Deutschland) GmbH, Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 München / Germany
Registergericht München HRB 106955, Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Alexander
Walter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95839
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:628b78f9794a2eefcbc578011806bfa8e09b9ef7
commit r11-1653-g628b78f9794a2eefcbc578011806bfa8e09b9ef7
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95809
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
yup, dr2061 made that ill-formed.
p1701 (wg21.link/p1701) documents the behaviour and it appears EWG is exploring
another avenue to resolve the underlying problem 2061 was attempting to fix.
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
