https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96416
Bug ID: 96416
Summary: address_of() is broken by static_assert in
pointer_traits
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96404
--- Comment #13 from David Edelsohn ---
The symptom I see on AIX is that the labels for DWARF variable locations differ
between stage2 and stage3 for some files. The difference started with the
recent change to the var-tracking pass. Once the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96415
Bug ID: 96415
Summary: GCC produces incorrect code for loops with -O3 for
skylake-avx512 and icelake-server
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96414
--- Comment #1 from Paul Keir ---
constexpr int lt_fun(const char& c1, const char& c2) {
return c1 < c2;
}
constexpr bool doit()
{
char *pc = new char;
const char* s = "a";
*pc = 'b';
lt_fun(*s, *pc); // a < b
*pc = 'a';
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96414
Bug ID: 96414
Summary: Second char relation test incorrect with constexpr
dynamic allocation
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 07:02:07PM +0800, Jojo R wrote:
> +insn-generated-split-num = $(shell nproc)
nproc isn't portable, is not the same on every system, and can lead to
a number of processes quadratic in the number of processors being
launched (say, if someone does make -jK with K some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96413
Bug ID: 96413
Summary: Is single parameter specialisation useful besides
variadic template?
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pushed.
Gerald
---
htdocs/codingconventions.html | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/codingconventions.html b/htdocs/codingconventions.html
index c0377315..162e1dda 100644
--- a/htdocs/codingconventions.html
+++ b/htdocs/codingconventions.html
@@ -145,7
Snapshot gcc-10-20200801 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20200801/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/INT.html#INT
has two occurrences of 'or' next to each other.
Arguments:
A Shall be of type INTEGER, REAL, or COMPLEX or or a boz-literal-constant.
HTH,
Nino
---
htdocs/git.html | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/git.html b/htdocs/git.html
index f7f87a9d..905ce80e 100644
--- a/htdocs/git.html
+++ b/htdocs/git.html
@@ -1117,7 +1117,6 @@ merged.
milepost-branch
This branch is for GCC developments done in the Milepost
Pushed.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
2020-08-02 Gerald Pfeifer
* doc/xml/manual/using_exceptions.xml: Move www.stroustrup.com to
https.
* doc/html/manual/using_exceptions.html: Regenerate.
---
libstdc++-v3/doc/html/manual/using_exceptions.html | 2 +-
For once corporate webmasters who keep their house in order and added
proper redirects.
Pushed.
Gerald
---
htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html
index 3713a394..e95aabbe 100644
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96407
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-01
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96337
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka ---
> I think, this inliner change needs to be reverted. People expect -O2 to
> produce
> decently optimized binaries, and starting with gcc 10.x it doesn't deliver.
> -O3
> traditionally enabled optimizations
> I think, this inliner change needs to be reverted. People expect -O2 to
> produce
> decently optimized binaries, and starting with gcc 10.x it doesn't deliver.
> -O3
> traditionally enabled optimizations that may or may not improve performance
> (and historically, sometimes even break code),
This libgo patch updates the sources to the go1.15rc1 release
candidate. As usual, the changes for this update are too large to
include in an e-mail message. I've just included the highlights and
changes to GCC-specific files below. Bootstrapped and ran Go
testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96337
--- Comment #14 from Dávid Bolvanský ---
Or change -Os to be gcc10 -O2 with less inlining, -revert O2 to gcc9 -02 and
implement -Oz to create agressive “-Os”.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96140
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96337
--- Comment #13 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
I think, this inliner change needs to be reverted. People expect -O2 to produce
decently optimized binaries, and starting with gcc 10.x it doesn't deliver. -O3
traditionally enabled optimizations
This patch silences a number of unused parameter warnings whilst
compiling both generic-match.c and gimple-match.c. The problem is
that multiple (polymorphic) functions are generated for generic_simplify
and gimple_simplify, each handling tree codes with a specific number
of children.
Hi Paul,
The attached patch regtests on FC31/x86_64 - OK for trunk?
OK. Thanks for the patch!
Best regards
Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96140
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6e2dc45099d5d23dfeae245617f316e95ac646b
commit r9-8776-ga6e2dc45099d5d23dfeae245617f316e95ac646b
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96140
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:891bd1f15280def813bf6a363495d44951e13e04
commit r10-8558-g891bd1f15280def813bf6a363495d44951e13e04
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96412
Bug ID: 96412
Summary: format suggestion issue
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
Hi,
the frequency of self recursive call can never be 1 or more or the
function would never finish. Yet we could do that based on static
guesses and that may confuse IPA passes expondentially increasing
frequency of functions.
This patch fixes it by simply capping the BB containing self recursive
Hi,
while looking into the chromium build issue I noticed that order can get
pretty large. This patch adds checking so we know if it ever overflows
or if someone uses it incorrectly (the second is important since one
uninitialized order may disturb lto streaming)
Honza
gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96404
--- Comment #12 from David Edelsohn ---
r11-2446 succeeds and r11-2447 fails, so the failure (at least on AIX) is the
var-tracking dataflow patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96411
Bug ID: 96411
Summary: erroneous "trait used in its own initializer" error
when using concepts in a requirement
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96407
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96409
--- Comment #2 from 康桓瑋 ---
Equivalent example:
https://godbolt.org/z/n47Gfh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96408
--- Comment #3 from 康桓瑋 ---
Live example:
https://godbolt.org/z/vMT5Md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96410
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
Equivalent example:
https://godbolt.org/z/chYW3c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96410
Bug ID: 96410
Summary: A lambda with a template parameter list using C++20
requires clauses is not usable in a constant
expression
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96214
--- Comment #5 from Jonny Grant ---
I saw this similar one too:-
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options
-Wduplicated-cond
Warn about duplicated conditions in an if-else-if chain. For instance, warn for
the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96408
--- Comment #2 from 康桓瑋 ---
Created attachment 48979
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48979=edit
the source file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96409
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
Created attachment 48978
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48978=edit
the source file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96409
Bug ID: 96409
Summary: A lambda with a template parameter list inside the
template function using C++20 nested requirements
clauses occurs internal compiler error
Product:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96408
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
Created attachment 48976
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48976=edit
the preprocessed file
gcc -v -save-temps -std=c++20 main.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96408
Bug ID: 96408
Summary: C++20 new attribute [[no_unique_address]] occurs the
internal compile error
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96377
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d599ad27b9bcf5165f87710f1abc64bbabd06ae
commit r11-2481-g7d599ad27b9bcf5165f87710f1abc64bbabd06ae
Author: Richard Sandiford
On 01. 08. 20 13:02, Jojo R wrote:
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * genemit.c (main): Print 'split line'.
> * Makefile.in (insn-emit.c): Define split count and file
>
> ---
> gcc/Makefile.in | 11 +++
> gcc/genemit.c | 87 -
> 2 files
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96404
--- Comment #11 from David Edelsohn ---
r11-2447 fails. Testing r11-2446.
Committed to trunk, Thanks.
Xianmiao
On 7/31/20 3:18 PM, Jojo R wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/csky/csky_opts.h (float_abi_type): New.
* config/csky/csky.h (TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT): New.
(TARGET_HARD_FLOAT): New.
(TARGET_HARD_FLOAT_ABI): New.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* genemit.c (main): Print 'split line'.
* Makefile.in (insn-emit.c): Define split count and file
---
gcc/Makefile.in | 11 +++
gcc/genemit.c | 87 -
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff
The attached patch regtests on FC31/x86_64 - OK for trunk?
Cheers
Paul
Commit message:
This patch fixes PR96325. See the explanatory comment in the testcase.
2020-08-01 Paul Thomas
gcc/fortran
PR target/96325
* primary.c (gfc_match_varspec): In the case that a component
reference is added
Hi Thomas,
I discovered the bit about the ChangeLogs last night but thanks for the
warning:-)
The commit message reads:
This patch fixes PR96320. See the explanatory comment in the testcase.
2020-08-01 Paul Thomas
gcc/fortran
PR target/96320
* interface.c (gfc_check_dummy_characteristics):
Hi Paul,
This is my first foray into gfortran for quite a little while so I am going
cautiously on this 'obvious' patch. The comment in the patch and the
ChangLog are clear enough that no further explanation is needed.
Regtests on FC31.x86_64 - OK for trunk?
If I read the PR correctly, this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96407
Bug ID: 96407
Summary: LTO inlined functions don't inherit disabled warnings
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95433
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
Patch posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/551154.html for the
original testcase.
Note that solving univariate polynomial equations *in the integers* (the
rationals are not much
Hello,
this transformation is quite straightforward, without overflow, 3*X==15 is
the same as X==5 and 3*X==5 cannot happen. Adding a single_use restriction
for the first case didn't seem necessary, although of course it can
slightly increase register pressure in some cases.
51 matches
Mail list logo
