https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97123
Bug ID: 97123
Summary: double free detected in tcache 2 with recursive
allocatable type
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97120
--- Comment #2 from Avi Kivity ---
This makes sense, according to my very limited ability to understand the
standard. I reflected it to the clang bug here:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47509.
On Linux/x86_64,
6450f07388f9fe575a489c9309c36012b17b88b0 is the first bad commit
commit 6450f07388f9fe575a489c9309c36012b17b88b0
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Sat Sep 19 17:21:52 2020 -0600
Infrastructure & C front end changes for array parameter checking (PR
c/50584).
caused
FAIL:
On Linux/x86_64,
6450f07388f9fe575a489c9309c36012b17b88b0 is the first bad commit
commit 6450f07388f9fe575a489c9309c36012b17b88b0
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Sat Sep 19 17:21:52 2020 -0600
Infrastructure & C front end changes for array parameter checking (PR
c/50584).
caused
FAIL:
On Linux/x86_64,
6450f07388f9fe575a489c9309c36012b17b88b0 is the first bad commit
commit 6450f07388f9fe575a489c9309c36012b17b88b0
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Sat Sep 19 17:21:52 2020 -0600
Infrastructure & C front end changes for array parameter checking (PR
c/50584).
caused
FAIL:
On Linux/x86_64,
6450f07388f9fe575a489c9309c36012b17b88b0 is the first bad commit
commit 6450f07388f9fe575a489c9309c36012b17b88b0
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Sat Sep 19 17:21:52 2020 -0600
Infrastructure & C front end changes for array parameter checking (PR
c/50584).
caused
FAIL:
On Linux/x86_64,
6450f07388f9fe575a489c9309c36012b17b88b0 is the first bad commit
commit 6450f07388f9fe575a489c9309c36012b17b88b0
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Sat Sep 19 17:21:52 2020 -0600
Infrastructure & C front end changes for array parameter checking (PR
c/50584).
caused
FAIL:
On Linux/x86_64,
3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca is the first bad commit
commit 3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Sat Sep 19 17:47:29 2020 -0600
Extend -Warray-bounds to detect out-of-bounds accesses to array parameters.
caused
FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-20
Ever
On 9/19/20 4:32 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 9/18/20 3:09 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
O
What I meant by proxy is a substitute class each of whose objects
stands in for a single instance of int_range where N is
a runtime value. There's no class like that.
[Just to be clear, I don't meant for
with: .././src/configure --prefix=/home/MEGMS2/ian/usr/gcc-11.0.0
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto --enable-libgomp --enable-checking=release
--disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 11.0.0 20200919 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82608
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Despite the enhancement the test case in comment #0 is still not diagnosed (the
n argument has no range).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 84051, which changed state.
Bug 84051 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds on an
out-of-bounds access via an array pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84051
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84051
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67793
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67793
Bug 67793 depends on bug 50584, which changed state.
Bug 50584 Summary: No warning for passing small array to C99 static array
declarator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584
What|Removed |Added
On 9/17/20 4:38 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
Attached is an updated revision of the patch. Besides the tweaks
above it also contains a cosmetic change to the warning issued
for mismatches in unspecified VLA bounds: it points at the decl
with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94195
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca
commit r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82608
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca
commit r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:baad4c48a85a354d2bf1b17e5aff71203c08adea
commit r11-3305-gbaad4c48a85a354d2bf1b17e5aff71203c08adea
Author: Martin Sebor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84051
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca
commit r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca
commit r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da87908a11b59bf364ad40ddca
Author: Martin Sebor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6450f07388f9fe575a489c9309c36012b17b88b0
commit r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe575a489c9309c36012b17b88b0
Author: Martin Sebor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97120
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from TC
Snapshot gcc-10-20200919 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20200919/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
Hi,
this is cleaned up version of the patch. I removed unfinished bits, fixed
propagation, cleaned it up and fixed fallout.
At present modref does bare minimum of what it can do and only collects
base/ref alias sets of accesses to disambiguate uding them. I have followup
patches adding more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96337
--- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka ---
> OK, will do, but, at least superficially, our situation seems very similar to
> this one, so I thought it would be better to keep this one going. But, again,
> I'll open the new one as soon as I can make a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96337
--- Comment #19 from Vadim Zeitlin ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #18)
> We need a reproducer to fix bugs.
Yes, of course, I understand this. I just didn't have time to make one yet,
we've literally discovered the issue only today
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96337
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka ---
> I've just subscribed to this bug because we see bug slow downs in our project
> when switching from 8.3 to 10.2 (89% slower in an important use case, 30%
> slowdown more or less across the board), without
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96337
--- Comment #17 from Vadim Zeitlin ---
I've just subscribed to this bug because we see bug slow downs in our project
when switching from 8.3 to 10.2 (89% slower in an important use case, 30%
slowdown more or less across the board), without any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96337
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
[temp.deduct.guide]p3: Two deduction guide declarations in the same
translation unit for the same class template shall not have equivalent
parameter-declaration-clauses.
So let's detect that.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/97099
This PR points out that we accept
template struct tuple { tuple(T); }; // #1
template explicit tuple(T t) -> tuple; // #2
tuple t = { 1 };
despite the 'explicit' deduction guide in a copy-list-initialization
context. That's because in deduction_guides_for we first find the
user-defined
I noticed that clang++ has this CTAD warning and thought that it might
be useful to have it. From clang++: "Some style guides want to allow
using CTAD only on types that "opt-in"; i.e. on types that are designed
to support it and not just types that *happen* to work with it."
So this warning
On 9/18/20 12:29 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 9/17/20 10:18 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 9/17/20 12:39 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 9/17/20 12:08 PM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 9/16/20 9:23 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 9/15/20 1:47 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Overflowing the size of a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97121
Bug ID: 97121
Summary: ICE (segfault) on incorrect default three-way
comparison declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
On 9/18/20 3:09 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 9/18/20 4:35 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 9/18/20 11:36 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On
it works exactly like one would expect a simple allocator to work..
as long as the allcoator is "live", its allocations are live. once
it is destructed, all the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89067
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
In the testcase below, the dependent specializations iter_reference_t
and iter_reference_t share the same tree due to specialization
caching. So when find_template_parameters walks through the
requires-expression (as part of normalization), it sees and includes the
out-of-scope template parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85836
Bug 85836 depends on bug 97036, which changed state.
Bug 97036 Summary: [F2018] ELEMENTAL RECURSIVE subprogram prefix combination
rejected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97036
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97036
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97036
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7d2d4be7650acceb9d39327e21ee04f640c152f
commit r11-3298-gf7d2d4be7650acceb9d39327e21ee04f640c152f
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93423
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93423
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0c7ff6237c78d99b40869afbdcdbe27fe98b698
commit r8-10521-ge0c7ff6237c78d99b40869afbdcdbe27fe98b698
Author: Tobias Burnus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0c7ff6237c78d99b40869afbdcdbe27fe98b698
commit r8-10521-ge0c7ff6237c78d99b40869afbdcdbe27fe98b698
Author: Tobias Burnus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93423
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aef149efb6d3fc97a38c74f7022124a6ba247746
commit r8-10520-gaef149efb6d3fc97a38c74f7022124a6ba247746
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93423
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e442063a0adf01e6348e9fc55cc3e9869974769
commit r9-8921-g0e442063a0adf01e6348e9fc55cc3e9869974769
Author: Tobias Burnus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93423
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ec4a3d307210b5c62e9718eff4a32b058e14c78
commit r9-8920-g5ec4a3d307210b5c62e9718eff4a32b058e14c78
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e442063a0adf01e6348e9fc55cc3e9869974769
commit r9-8921-g0e442063a0adf01e6348e9fc55cc3e9869974769
Author: Tobias Burnus
On 18/09/2020 12:25, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
This patch fixes a problem in which nested OpenMP parallel regions cause
errors if the number of inner teams is not balanced (i.e. the number of
loop iterations is not divisible by the number of physical threads). A
testcase is included.
This updated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97076
Dimitrij Mijoski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96861
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c66c004ad610f4f02d5f065fe29c4c10f05ae13f
commit r11-3297-gc66c004ad610f4f02d5f065fe29c4c10f05ae13f
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sat Sep 19
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 11:11 PM Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:10 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 9/15/20 9:20 PM, Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > Hi:
> > > Rtx cost of sse_to_integer would be used by pass_stv as a
> > > measurement for the scalar-to-vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
--- Comment #16 from Hongtao.liu ---
I notice
0x5561dc0 _36 * 2 1 times scalar_stmt costs 16 in body
0x5561dc0 _38 * 2 1 times scalar_stmt costs 16 in body
0x5562df0 _36 * 2 1 times vector_stmt costs 16 in body
0x5562df0 _38 * 2 1 times
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97120
Bug ID: 97120
Summary: circular concept loops in
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97051
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dea470d09155f2007bdd502c16614128cb6f9348
commit r11-3295-gdea470d09155f2007bdd502c16614128cb6f9348
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97103
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5d72c840a226fdbab65912f97d42a1dbdaf6ed2
commit r11-3296-ge5d72c840a226fdbab65912f97d42a1dbdaf6ed2
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96531
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5d72c840a226fdbab65912f97d42a1dbdaf6ed2
commit r11-3296-ge5d72c840a226fdbab65912f97d42a1dbdaf6ed2
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96861
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96861
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83858ba1db31cd83667592a41d71315090459da4
commit r11-3294-g83858ba1db31cd83667592a41d71315090459da4
Author: liuhongt
Date: Wed Sep
On 29/05/20 07:17 +0100, Mike Crowe via Libstdc++ wrote:
> > > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_futex.h
> > > b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_futex.h
> > > index 5f95ade..aa137a7 100644
> > > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_futex.h
> > > +++
On Friday 11 September 2020 at 19:59:36 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> commit 53ad6b1979f4bd7121e977c4a44151b14d8a0147
> Author: Jonathan Wakely
> Date: Fri Sep 11 19:59:11 2020
>
> libstdc++: Fix chrono::__detail::ceil to work with C++11
>
> In C++11 constexpr functions can only
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2020 2:31 AM
> To: duanbo (C)
> Cc: GCC Patches ; rguent...@suse.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH PR96757] aarch64: ICE during GIMPLE pass: vect
>
> "duanbo (C)" writes:
> > @@
64 matches
Mail list logo
