--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-15 14:52 ---
It is caused by revision 157203:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-03/msg00075.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-15 18:28 ---
It is introduced between revision 157457 and revision 157460.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-15 18:49 ---
It is caused by revision 157458:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-03/msg00295.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43379
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-15 21:01 ---
It is an oversight. How should we deal with it?
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-14 15:32 ---
Gcc 4.3 also failed. It also failed on Linux/x86-64.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-14 17:27 ---
It is caused by revision 151696:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-09/msg00443.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-14 18:25 ---
It is caused by revision 121227:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-01/msg00933.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-14 18:31 ---
The patch started at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01682.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43360
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ice: in may_propagate_copy, |[4.5 Regression] ice: in
|at tree-ssa-copy.c:85
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-14 21:46 ---
It is caused by revision 156076:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-01/msg00543.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-14 23:27 ---
It is caused by revision 131044:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-12/msg00495.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-15 03:34 ---
It is caused by revision 132681:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-02/msg00696.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-13 16:52 ---
gfortran.dg/internal_pack_12.f90 failed with gcc 4.4 branch
as of 2010-03-13. Is this a regression on 4.4 branch?
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #15 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-11 14:24
---
You can find my SPEC CPU pass/fail results at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/
The last one is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-03/msg00855.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-11 20:06 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 43336 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-11 20:06 ---
*** Bug 41931 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-11 21:12 ---
It is caused by revision 149721:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-07/msg00602.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl dot tools at gmail dot
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-10 17:50 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Created an attachment (id=20074)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20074action=view) [edit]
Experimental patch
This patch fixes the problem for me. Testsuites are still
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-10 20:05 ---
It is fixed on trunk on revision 148631:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-06/msg00613.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-09 18:11 ---
Please also upload tie.o.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-09 18:30 ---
Please also update tie executables generated by Sun and GNU linkers
with the SAME relocatable input.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43309
--- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-09 18:45
---
Sun linker changes
4: 64 48 8b 14 25 00 00 00 00 mov%fs:0x0,%rdx
d: 48 8b 05 00 00 00 00mov0x0(%rip),%rax# 14 main+0x14
10: R_X86_64_GOTTPOFF cnt-0x4
to
400e0c: 64
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-09 18:59 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Confirmed. Introduced by Honza with the optimize_insn_for_size_p () changes.
That is revision 138835:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-08/msg00394.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #13 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-09 22:39
---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
Created an attachment (id=20044)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20044action=view) [edit]
gcc44-pr43290-2.patch
Another fix. Wonder
--- Comment #14 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-09 22:44
---
Is there a way to add debug testcases from PR 36728 to gcc testsuite?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43290
--- Comment #17 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-10 05:37
---
(In reply to comment #15)
Yes, sticking them in gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/ and using
/* { dg-final { gdb-test line varname expectedvalue } } */
If my patch really broke that, then I think we'll need
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-08 15:03 ---
Can you make it to fail on trunk or 4.4 branch since it
could be caused by other changes on redhat/gcc-4_4-branch?
If not, can you find out which change on redhat/gcc-4_4-branch
causes this?
--
http
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-08 15:27 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I've tried, but haven't succeeded, that's why I said the bug is latent there.
If we can prove this situation can't ever happen on 4.4 or 4.5 (4.5 on this
testcase doesn't use a drap reg
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-08 15:47 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Ah, the %ebp saved in DW_OP_reg5 is just a 4.4 bug, fixed by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-05/msg00235.html (the fix is in 4.5 and
4.4-RH). Saying that %ebp is saved
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-08 16:32 ---
It is caused by revision 154121:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00342.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43288
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-08 16:58 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Created an attachment (id=20044)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20044action=view) [edit]
gcc44-pr43290-2.patch
Another fix. Wonder why that insn is marked as frame
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-08 22:54 ---
It was fixed between revision 157277 and revision 157292.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-07 14:43
---
Confirmed. This patch:
Fix PR42326: handle default definitions.
2010-03-02 Sebastian Pop sebastian@amd.com
PR middle-end/42326
* sese.c (name_defined_in_loop_p): Return false for default
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-07 16:56 ---
It is caused by revision 148848:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-06/msg00831.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43280
libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-2.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43274
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-05 17:02 ---
It is caused by revision 123038:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-03/msg00628.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43265
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-03 17:06 ---
It is caused by tuples merge. We must have missed something.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43248
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-03 22:30 ---
-ftree-vectorize never worked correctly on this testcase
until PR 24581 is fixed.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24581 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-03 22:30 ---
*** Bug 43251 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-03 22:49 ---
It is a dup of PR 24581. Backporting the gcc/tree-complex.c change
in revision 147281:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=147281
to 4.4 fixes this.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-03 22:49 ---
*** Bug 43251 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24581
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43230
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43230
--- Comment #18 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-02 13:31
---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-02 16:36 ---
It is caused by revision 157009:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-02/msg00592.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-01 13:31 ---
This is done on purpose to provide backward compatibility
since vmovq isn't in original x86-64 spec and older assemblers
don't support it. From i386-opc.tbl in binutils:
// These really shouldn't allow for Reg64
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-01 15:42 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I fail to see why binutils accepting both version should be a reason to
not fix gcc.
What is the minimum binutils required by gcc? Does it support movq?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-01 23:16 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
What is the minimum binutils required by gcc? Does it support movq?
install.texi says that i?86-linux-gnu requires 2.13.1.
Since you are listed as x86
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-01 23:18 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
install.texi says that i?86-linux-gnu requires 2.13.1.
binutils-2.13.1.tar.bz2 07-Nov-2002 23:45 9.5M
binutils-2.13.1.tar.gz07-Nov
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-28 17:02 ---
It is caused by revision 156701:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-02/msg00283.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43209
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-27 21:37 ---
Please try
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg01222.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-27 22:34 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
With the patch proposed in comment 1, I now get...
Does it fix your problem?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43202
--- Comment #13 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-27 23:31
---
(In reply to comment #10)
Reduced testcase:
templateclass A class NumericTraits{};
templateclass B class CovariantVector{};
templateclass C class Image{};
templateclass H,
class E,
class
--- Comment #15 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-28 00:03
---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
It may be a different issue since the original testcase
compiles with older gcc.
It is still a regression from gcc 4.4.1:
pr43087-delta.ii:25: error
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43206
--- Comment #16 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-28 00:08
---
(In reply to comment #15)
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
It may be a different issue since the original testcase
compiles with older gcc.
It is still a regression from gcc 4.4.1
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43206
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-28 07:24 ---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-26 14:05 ---
gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-4.c will
fail on x86-64 since -march=x86_64 will be added
by default since:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-02/msg00664.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-26 14:49 ---
Fixed in 4.5.0.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
] Many test failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-26 22:57 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Created an attachment (id=19971)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19971action=view) [edit]
patch
HJL, could you test this patch in your setup?
I am testing
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43175
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-25 14:53 ---
Starting program: /export/build/gnu/gcc-avx/build-x86_64-linux/prev-gcc/a.out
Breakpoint 1, 0x003b55c33da0 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb) f 1
#1 0x00400552 in main () at /tmp/x.c:29
29
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-25 14:55 ---
This code:
0x004004f8 +84:vpxor %xmm0,%xmm0,%xmm0
0x004004fc +88:vpblendw $0x3,%xmm0,%xmm0,%xmm0
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-25 15:06 ---
We expand
D.3242_4 = __builtin_ia32_vec_perm_v4si (D.3241_3, D.3240_2, { 4, 1, 2, 3 });
into
(insn 27 24 28 3 x.i:22 (set (subreg:V8HI (reg:V4SI 75) 0)
(vec_merge:V8HI (subreg:V8HI (reg:V4SI 75) 0
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-25 15:30 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
I think that this code:
i[0].s[0] = 0;
i[0].s[1] = 1;
i[0].s[2] = 2;
i[0].s[3] = 3;
i[0].s[4] = 4;
i[0].s[5] = 5;
i[0].s[6] = 6;
i[0].s[7] = 7;
is also wrong
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-25 19:34 ---
The testcase will also fail with -msse4.1:
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/bld/gcc//xgcc
-B/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/bld/gcc// -O -msse4.1
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tablesx.c -o x
./x
make: *** [all
--- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-25 19:55
---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
The testcase will also fail with -msse4.1:
Add this patch (please note that input operands of blend MD patterns are
*reversed*):
@@ -29153,7 +29153,7
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-25 19:25 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
A blind guess:
Index: i386.c
===
--- i386.c (revision 157069)
+++ i386.c (working copy)
@@ -29144,8 +29144,8
--- Comment #13 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-25 20:33
---
Created an attachment (id=19959)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19959action=view)
A patch
I am testing this patch. OK for trunk if there are no regressions
on Intel Core i7?
--
http
--- Comment #14 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-25 20:36
---
Created an attachment (id=19960)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19960action=view)
A patch
Include testcase.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #16 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-26 00:53
---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg01088.html
Intel Core i7 result is OK:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-02/msg02465.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35259
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36513
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41779
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43068
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40823
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43015
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
Version|unknown |4.5.0
http
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
GCC target triplet: ii686-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43153
--- Comment #15 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-23 22:04
---
The new testcase failed on Fedora 12/i686:
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43077-1.c -O2 line 42 varb == 2
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43077-1.c -O2 line 42 varc == 3
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43077-1.c -O2 -flto line 42
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-21 15:39 ---
It also failed on Linux/x86-64 with -m32:
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr41779.c -Wc++-compat (test for warnings, line 30)
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|middle-end |c
Ever
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43128
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-21 16:15 ---
It is C99 and ILP32:
[...@gnu-6 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -S
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr41779.c -Wconversion
-m32 -std=c99
[...@gnu-6 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -S
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc
--- Comment #14 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-21 16:34
---
(In reply to comment #13)
What is the status of this issue?
It is implemented on ifunc branch.
Is option 3 implemented?
Yes, on ifunc branch.
Which versions of Linux and binutils support IFUNC?
You need
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-21 16:46 ---
On Linux/ia32, -std=c99 changes silently float to long double
and we don't get a warning. It is a regression from gcc 4.4.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-21 16:47
---
[...@gnu-6 gcc]$ cat /tmp/x.i
float f5(float x, int y)
{
return x * y;
}
[...@gnu-6 gcc]$ gcc -S /tmp/x.i -Wconversion -m32 -std=c99
/tmp/x.i: In function f5:
/tmp/x.i:3: warning: conversion to float from
--- Comment #14 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-21 18:00
---
That is true that the previous release didn't have proper excess
precision semantics. But from the user perspective, the previous
release handles
--
float f5(float x, int y)
{
return x * y;
}
--
correctly
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-20 15:53 ---
On Linux/ia32, I still got
Executing on host: /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/bld/gcc/xgcc
-B/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/bld/gcc/
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/src-trunk/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr41779.c
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43121
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-19 15:14 ---
It is caused by revision 156889:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-02/msg00472.html
Jakub, you missed:
[...@gnu-12 gcc]$ grep add_reg_br_prob_note *.[ch]
except.c:add_reg_br_prob_note (get_insns
-
used.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43125
--- Comment #13 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-20 01:05
---
*** Bug 43124 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-20 01:05 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 39315 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
901 - 1000 of 3333 matches
Mail list logo
