On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:46:10PM +1000, Ben Elliston wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 06:17 -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
BTW, an x86 DFP configure bug was reported 3 months ago. But it still
hasn't benen fixed. I opened a DFP bug report:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32351
H. J. Lu wrote:
Good. I have another question. Intel BID patch itself doesn't change
any sources in DFP nor libdecnummber. The only significant change is
to change Makefile in libgcc to use Intel BID library for DFP
intrinsics when BID encoding is selected. Currently, DFP is only
supported
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 06:17 -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
BTW, an x86 DFP configure bug was reported 3 months ago. But it still
hasn't benen fixed. I opened a DFP bug report:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32351
with a patch. I hope it will be fixed before gcc 4.3 is released :-).
It is a libdecnumber bug, which only affects x86.
The patch is ok.
Paolo
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 04:31:14PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
H. J. Lu wrote:
Who are those relevant maintainers? Since Intel BID patches only
affects DFP intrinsics, which is only supported on Linux/PPC,
Linux/ia32 and Linux/x86-64 while Linux/PPC uses DPD encoding, not
BID encoding,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 03:39:49PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
in the relatively near future. I am also considering the Intel BID
patches for 4.3, as those have arrived just under the wire. I would
appreciate comments from relevant maintainers about those patches.
Who are those relevant
Hello!
BTW, an x86 DFP configure bug was reported 3 months ago. But it still
hasn't benen fixed. I opened a DFP bug report:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32351
with a patch. I hope it will be fixed before gcc 4.3 is released :-).
So, is this bug a configure bug, DFP bug or
Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote:
GCC 4.3 Stage 1 is now closed.
[...]
As previously discussed, the mainline will be in lockdown for 1-2
weeks, starting midnight tonight. Other then the merges mentioned
above, and documentation improvements, the only patches
H. J. Lu wrote:
Who are those relevant maintainers? Since Intel BID patches only
affects DFP intrinsics, which is only supported on Linux/PPC,
Linux/ia32 and Linux/x86-64 while Linux/PPC uses DPD encoding, not
BID encoding, I assume the relevant maintainers are maintainers for
DFP, libgcc
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 05:22:25PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
BTW, an x86 DFP configure bug was reported 3 months ago. But it still
hasn't benen fixed. I opened a DFP bug report:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32351
with a patch. I hope it will be fixed before gcc
GCC 4.3 Stage 1 is now closed.
After this point, major new functionality (i.e., the sort of thing
deserving its own branch) that has not already been submitted will be
held for GCC 4.4.
Hopefully, the PTR_PLUS branch and the fixed-point branch will be merged
in the relatively near future. I am
On 6/15/07, Kaveh R. GHAZI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Timezone please? PDT?
I say JST because that past almost 13 hours ago :). Going to Japan
gets me into that mood.
-- Pinski
On 6/15/07, Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully, the PTR_PLUS branch and the fixed-point branch will be merged
in the relatively near future.
I checked in pointer_plus as revision 125755.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
13 matches
Mail list logo
